Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 20:58 UTC

swoole / swoole-src

🚀 Coroutine-based concurrency library for PHP

C++ · PHPApache-2.0★ 18,917 stars⑂ 3,144 forkssince Jul 2012View on GitHub ↗

swoole/swoole-src holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Security (66/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Swoole ProjectOrganization · verified domain
345 followers34 public repossince Jul 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistswoole/swoolev6.2.23,2032770 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 277 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year277
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year35

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~29 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv6.1.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases29
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 18,917 stars
25/25Forks — 3,144 forks
15/15Watchers — 805 watchers
Inputs used
forks3,144
stars18,917
watchers805
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadgen.net, codecov.io, github.com, opencollective.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.7/80Monthly downloads — 3,203 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesswoole/swoole
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads21,128
monthly_downloads3,203
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.601
How it's scored
41.9/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance — 1,910/2,295 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs1,910
open_issues6
closed_issues3,739
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d16
prs_decided_30d26
issue_closed_ratio0.998
closed_unmerged_prs385
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.3/25Owner reach — 345 followers of swoole
23.2/25Track record — 34 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers345
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginswoole
public_repos34
account_age_days4,451

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 70 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesswoole/swoole
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish70

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.swoole.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsswoole, coroutines, php, websocket, event, concurrency
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.swoole.com
docs_sitehttps://www.swoole.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages57
unassessed_packages4
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 57 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

89Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 75 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.798
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,834
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — examples/cpp/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
11/11Static type checking — C++ (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesexamples/cpp/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 19/936 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes478,353
source_files_sampled936
oversized_source_files19
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

18,917GitHub stars
99contributors
277commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
6open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-19: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 18917 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 18,893 ★ / 3,144 ⇿
18,893Stars
3,144Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-19. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

04,0008,00012,00016,00020,00018,8933,144212019-032022-122026-09
Major 2Minor 7Patch 75

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 20:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 54 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistswoole/make-libraryv1.0.0tools/composer.json
All dependencies 61

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 60 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistswoole/make-library1.0.0direct
npmmqtt^4.3.8indirect
npmpino^6.14.0indirect
npmws^8.18.2indirect
Packagistclue/ndjson-react1.3.0indirect
Packagistclue/stream-filter1.7.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistergebnis/agent-detector1.2.0indirect
Packagistevenement/evenement3.0.2indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.95.18indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.15.3indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.13.0indirect
Packagistnyholm/psr71.8.2indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphp-http/client-common2.7.3indirect
Packagistphp-http/discovery1.20.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/httplug2.4.1indirect
Packagistphp-http/message1.16.2indirect
Packagistphp-http/message-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/promise1.3.1indirect
Packagistpredis/predis2.4.1indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistreact/cache1.2.0indirect
Packagistreact/child-process0.6.7indirect
Packagistreact/dns1.14.0indirect
Packagistreact/event-loop1.6.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistreact/socket1.17.0indirect
Packagistreact/stream1.4.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff6.0.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.16indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.15indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.15indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client5.4.53indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts2.5.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.15indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 57 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.