Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-24 23:59 UTC

syberant / ncollide

2 and 3-dimensional collision detection library in Rust

RustBSD-3-Clause★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2019forkView on GitHub ↗

syberant/ncollide holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (60/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 2612 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 28 is calibrated to 22 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sybrand AarnoutsePersonal account
6 followers33 public repossince Jun 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioncollide_testbed2dpoints to another repo — not scored0.5.0753295 days agographicsgeometry2dncollidetestbed
crates.ioncollide_testbed3dpoints to another repo — not scored0.5.0863295 days agographics3dgeometryncollidetestbed
crates.ioncollide2dpoints to another repo — not scored0.33.03,692391620 days agocollisiongeometrydistancerayconvex
crates.ioncollide3dpoints to another repo — not scored0.33.014,708391620 days agocollisiongeometrydistancerayconvex

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 2,612 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2,612
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases25 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,634 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~35.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv0.19.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,634
mean_days_between_releases35.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

29At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 90% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.899
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
6.1/25Owner reach6 followers of syberant
23.2/25Track record33 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginsyberant
public_repos33
account_age_days3,716
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configrustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://ncollide.org
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ncollide.org
docs_sitehttps://ncollide.org
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
7.5/40Legible commit history14 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.14
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, ncollide_testbed2d/Makefile, ncollide_testbed3d/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configrustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, ncollide_testbed2d/Makefile, ncollide_testbed3d/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml, build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml, ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml, ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/273 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes31,291
source_files_sampled273
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
27contributors
0commits, last 12 months
2,612days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • crates package 'ncollide_testbed2d' points at a different repository (https://github.com/sebcrozet/ncollide); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'ncollide_testbed3d' points at a different repository (https://github.com/sebcrozet/ncollide); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'ncollide2d' points at a different repository (https://github.com/dimforge/ncollide); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'ncollide3d' points at a different repository (https://github.com/dimforge/ncollide); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10
3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-24 23:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 39
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotime0.1ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.5ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iosfml0.11ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalga0.7ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.16ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioncollide2d0.17ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iompeg_encoder0.2ncollide_testbed2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iotime0.1ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.5ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iokiss3d0.16ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iompeg_encoder0.2ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.16ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioncollide3d0.17ncollide_testbed3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeither1.0build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags1.0build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iodowncast-rs1.0build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec0.6build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioslab0.4build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iopetgraph0.4build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalga0.9build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.18build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioapprox0.3build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.6build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0build/ncollide2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeither1.0build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags1.0build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iodowncast-rs1.0build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec0.6build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioslab0.4build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iopetgraph0.4build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalga0.9build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.18build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioapprox0.3build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.6build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0build/ncollide3d/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioalgadirect
crates.ioapproxdirect
crates.iobitflagsdirect
crates.iodowncast-rsdirect
crates.ioeitherdirect
crates.iokiss3ddirect
crates.iompeg_encoderdirect
crates.ionalgebradirect
crates.ioncollide2ddirect
crates.ioncollide3ddirect
crates.ionum-traitsdirect
crates.iopetgraphdirect
crates.ioranddirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.iosfmldirect
crates.ioslabdirect
crates.iosmallvecdirect
crates.iotimedirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.