Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 11:58 UTC

synergy-software / synergy.framework

C#MIT★ 9 stars⑂ 1 forksince Nov 2016View on GitHub ↗

synergy-software/synergy.framework holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (62/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

synergy-softwareOrganization
0 followers8 public repossince Sep 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

51Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
11.5/18Commit volume18 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year18
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 957 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tag3.0.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release957
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars9 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars9
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesci.appveyor.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.5/80Total downloads272,259 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSynergy.Architecture.Annotations, Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams, Synergy.Behaviours.Testing, Synergy.Contracts
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads272,259
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.982
How it's scored
10.5/42Issue resolution25% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance12/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs12
open_issues12
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.25
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach0 followers of synergy-software
18.9/25Track record8 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginsynergy-software
public_repos8
account_age_days3,668

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history90 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSynergy.Architecture.Annotations, Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams, Synergy.Behaviours.Testing, Synergy.Contracts
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages34
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 34 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapArchitecture/Synergy.Architecture.Annotations/Synergy.Architecture.Annotations.csproj, Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams/Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams.csproj, Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Tests/Synergy.Architecture.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsArchitecture/Synergy.Architecture.Annotations/Synergy.Architecture.Annotations.csproj, Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams/Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams.csproj, Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Tests/Synergy.Architecture.Tests.csproj, Architecture/Synergy.Convention.Testing/Synergy.Convention.Testing.csproj, Behaviours/Synergy.Behaviours.Testing/Synergy.Behaviours.Testing.csproj, Behaviours/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests.csproj, Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.Test/Synergy.Contracts.Test.csproj, Contracts/Synergy.Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.csproj, Core/Synergy.Core.Sample/Synergy.Core.Sample.csproj, Core/Synergy.Core.Test/Synergy.Core.Test.csproj, Core/Synergy.Core.Web/Synergy.Core.Web.csproj, Core/Synergy.Core/Synergy.Core.csproj, Documentation/Synergy.Documentation.Annotations/Synergy.Documentation.Annotations.csproj, Documentation/Synergy.Documentation.Tests/Synergy.Documentation.Tests.csproj, Documentation/Synergy.Documentation/Synergy.Documentation.csproj, Pooling/Synergy.Pooling.Test/Synergy.Pooling.Test.csproj, Pooling/Synergy.Pooling.Tutorial/Synergy.Pooling.Tutorial.csproj, Pooling/Synergy.Pooling/Synergy.Pooling.csproj, Reflection/Synergy.Reflection.Test/Synergy.Reflection.Test.csproj, Reflection/Synergy.Reflection/Synergy.Reflection.csproj, Synergy.Catalogue/Synergy.Catalogue.csproj, Web/Sample/Synergy.Sample.Web.API.Services/Synergy.Sample.Web.API.Services.csproj, Web/Sample/Synergy.Sample.Web.API.Tests/Synergy.Sample.Web.API.Tests.csproj, Web/Sample/Synergy.Sample.Web.API/Synergy.Sample.Web.API.csproj, Web/Synergy.Web.Api.Testing/Synergy.Web.Api.Testing.csproj, Web/Synergy.Web.Api.Tests/Synergy.Web.Api.Tests.csproj, Web/Synergy.Web.Mvc/Synergy.Web.Mvc.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/300 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes19,045
source_files_sampled300
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessample, samples
Inputs used
example_dirssample, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

9GitHub stars
2contributors
18commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
12open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 11:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0Synergy.Catalogue/Synergy.Catalogue.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit22.11.5Synergy.Catalogue/Synergy.Catalogue.csproj
NuGetxunit2.6.6Synergy.Catalogue/Synergy.Catalogue.csproj
NuGetPlantUml.Net1.4.80Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams/Synergy.Architecture.Diagrams.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Tests/Synergy.Architecture.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit22.11.5Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Tests/Synergy.Architecture.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.6.6Architecture/Synergy.Architecture.Tests/Synergy.Architecture.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0Behaviours/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit22.11.5Behaviours/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.6.6Behaviours/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests/Synergy.Behaviours.Tests.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.Test/Synergy.Contracts.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.Test/Synergy.Contracts.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.0.1Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.Test/Synergy.Contracts.Test.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit22.11.5Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.Test/Synergy.Contracts.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit2.6.6Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.Test/Synergy.Contracts.Test.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4Contracts/Synergy.Contracts/Synergy.Contracts.csproj
NuGetCastle.Core4.4.0Core/Synergy.Core.Sample/Synergy.Core.Sample.csproj
NuGetCastle.Windsor5.0.0Core/Synergy.Core.Sample/Synergy.Core.Sample.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4Core/Synergy.Core.Sample/Synergy.Core.Sample.csproj
NuGetCastle.Core4.4.0Core/Synergy.Core.Test/Synergy.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetCastle.Windsor5.0.0Core/Synergy.Core.Test/Synergy.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4Core/Synergy.Core.Test/Synergy.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.11.0Core/Synergy.Core.Test/Synergy.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2021.3.0Core/Synergy.Core.Web/Synergy.Core.Web.csproj
NuGetCastle.Core4.4.0Core/Synergy.Core/Synergy.Core.csproj
NuGetCastle.Windsor5.0.0Core/Synergy.Core/Synergy.Core.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4Core/Synergy.Core/Synergy.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0Documentation/Synergy.Documentation.Tests/Synergy.Documentation.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit22.11.5Documentation/Synergy.Documentation.Tests/Synergy.Documentation.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.6.6Documentation/Synergy.Documentation.Tests/Synergy.Documentation.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.11.0Pooling/Synergy.Pooling.Test/Synergy.Pooling.Test.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4Pooling/Synergy.Pooling.Tutorial/Synergy.Pooling.Tutorial.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4Pooling/Synergy.Pooling/Synergy.Pooling.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2023.3.0Reflection/Synergy.Reflection.Test/Synergy.Reflection.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.14.0Reflection/Synergy.Reflection.Test/Synergy.Reflection.Test.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2023.3.0Reflection/Synergy.Reflection/Synergy.Reflection.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0Reflection/Synergy.Reflection/Synergy.Reflection.csproj
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 19 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCastle.Core4.2.1direct
NuGetCastle.Core4.4.0direct
NuGetCastle.Windsor4.1.0direct
NuGetCastle.Windsor5.0.0direct
NuGetCastle.Windsor6.0.0direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2018.2.1direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2021.3.0direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2023.3.0direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0direct
NuGetNUnit3.11.0direct
NuGetNUnit3.14.0direct
NuGetNUnit4.0.1direct
NuGetPlantUml.Net1.4.80direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0direct
NuGetVerify.Xunit22.11.5direct
NuGetxunit2.6.6direct
NuGetCastle.Windsor.MsDependencyInjection4.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvc5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Razor3.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebPages3.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson6.0.25indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing6.0.25indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning5.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer5.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Infrastructure1.0.0.0indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetSerilog.AspNetCore8.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Enrichers.Environment2.3.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Exceptions8.4.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.RollingFile3.3.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Seq6.0.0indirect
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore6.5.0indirect
NuGetSynergy.Contractsindirect
NuGetSynergy.Coreindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 34 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.