Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 21:59 UTC

tauri-apps / webkit2gtk-rs

WebKit2 bindings and wrappers for Rust

RustMIT★ 152 stars⑂ 37 forkssince Sep 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryDesktop applicationhow this is determined

tauri-apps/webkit2gtk-rs holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (81/100) and lowest on Vitality (35/100). It was last updated 240 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TauriOrganization
4,573 followers112 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iowebkit2gtk2.0.22,553,48236240 days agognomegtk-rsguiwebkitapi-bindings
crates.iowebkit2gtk-sys2.0.22,552,33326240 days agognomegtk-rsguiwebkitapi-bindings

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

35Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 240 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume4 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push240
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases33 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 240 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~102.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagwebkit2gtk-rs-v2.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release240
mean_days_between_releases102.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.3/60Stars152 stars
13/25Forks37 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks37
stars152
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads5,105,815 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageswebkit2gtk, webkit2gtk-sys
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads38,642,160
monthly_downloads5,105,815
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.405
How it's scored
32.8/42Issue resolution78% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance105/118 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs105
open_issues9
closed_issues32
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.78
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach4,573 followers of tauri-apps
25/25Track record112 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,573
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logintauri-apps
public_repos112
account_age_days2,544
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on crates
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 240 days ago
20/20Version history36 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageswebkit2gtk, webkit2gtk-sys
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish240

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/webkit2gtk
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/webkit2gtk
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
15.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories5 affected: glib 0.18.5 (moderate 5.3), gdk 0.18.2 (unknown), gdk-sys 0.18.2 (unknown), +2 more
15.5/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: atk 0.18.2 (unknown), atk-sys 0.18.2 (unknown), gtk3-macros 0.18.2 (unknown), +1 more
23.1/40No advisories left outstanding9 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 892 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories10
affected_packages9
assessed_packages75
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1, unknown 8
direct_affected_packages5
Matched the crates:webkit2gtk@2.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 75 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.2/40Legible commit history43 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.434
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, sys/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, sys/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
52.4/55Manageable file sizes4/85 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes260,951
source_files_sampled85
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

152GitHub stars
13contributors
4commits, last 12 months
240days since last push
33releases
2bus factor
9open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 37 ⇿
0Stars
37Forks
33Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383712018-012022-042026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 21:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobitflags^1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.8Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc^0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iocairo-rs^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iogdk^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iogdk-sys^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iogio^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iogio-sys^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib-sys^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iogobject-sys^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iogtk^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iogtk-sys^0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iojava_script_core=1.1Cargo.toml
crates.iosoup0.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioffi2.0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags^1.0sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iogtk0.18sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iogdk0.18sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio0.18sys/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib0.18sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iogobject0.18sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iocairo0.18sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iojava_script_core=1.1sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iosoup0.5sys/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 23

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobitflagsdirect
crates.iocairo-rsdirect
crates.iogdkdirect
crates.iogdk-sysdirect
crates.iogiodirect
crates.iogio-sysdirect
crates.ioglibdirect
crates.ioglib-sysdirect
crates.iogobject-sysdirect
crates.iogtkdirect
crates.iogtk-sysdirect
crates.iolibcdirect
crates.ioonce_celldirect
crates.iocairo-sys-rsindirect
crates.iojavascriptcore-rsindirect
crates.iojavascriptcore-rs-sysindirect
crates.iopkg-configindirect
crates.ioshell-wordsindirect
crates.iosoup3indirect
crates.iosoup3-sysindirect
crates.iosystem-depsindirect
crates.iotempfileindirect
crates.iowebkit2gtk-sysindirect
Dependency advisories 9

Installing crates:webkit2gtk@2.0.2 pulls in 75 packages, direct and transitive: 9 carry known advisories, of which 5 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
glib0.18.5directmoderate20.20.0
gdk0.18.2directunknown1
gdk-sys0.18.2directunknown1
gtk0.18.2directunknown1
gtk-sys0.18.2directunknown1
atk0.18.2indirectunknown1
atk-sys0.18.2indirectunknown1
gtk3-macros0.18.2indirectunknown1
proc-macro-error1.0.4indirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.