Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 04:29 UTC

teamchong / pxpipe

cut Claude Code token usage by rendering text context as images

TypeScriptMIT★ 7,291 stars⑂ 634 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

teamchong/pxpipe holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (59/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StevenPersonal account
494 followers405 public repossince Feb 2017Cloudflare

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmpxpipe-proxy0.13.29,307297 days agoclaudeclaude-codeanthropicfable-5proxytoken-optimizationprompt-cachevision-tokenscloudflare-workers

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 464 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year464
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv0.13.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 7,291 stars
23.3/25Forks — 634 forks
7.7/15Watchers — 25 watchers
Inputs used
forks634
stars7,291
watchers25
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
52.9/80Monthly downloads — 9,307 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespxpipe-proxy
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9,307
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.867
How it's scored
28.1/42Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
18.2/30PR acceptance — 86/142 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 8/12 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs86
open_issues31
closed_issues63
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d31
prs_decided_30d38
issue_closed_ratio0.67
closed_unmerged_prs56
first_time_authors_30d10
first_time_prs_merged_30d8
first_time_prs_decided_30d12
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.4/25Owner reach — 494 followers of teamchong
25/25Track record — 405 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers494
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginteamchong
public_repos405
account_age_days3,475
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 29 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespxpipe-proxy
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
2.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:pxpipe-proxy@0.13.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 93 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.969
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
49.5/55Manageable file sizes — 27/271 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes4,094,054
source_files_sampled271
oversized_source_files27

Key facts

7,291GitHub stars
27contributors
464commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
31open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 19 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 634 ⇿
0Stars
634Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375500625750631982026-072026-072026-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 5
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 04:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests9 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 7/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmgpt-tokenizer^3.4.0package.json
All dependencies 221

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 220 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmgpt-tokenizer3.4.0direct
npm@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler0.5.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/unenv-preset2.16.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-641.20260801.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-arm641.20260801.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-641.20260801.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-arm641.20260801.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-windows-641.20260801.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workers-types5.20260809.1indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@img/colour1.1.0indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-freebsd-wasm320.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.3.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-ppc640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-riscv640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-webcontainers-wasm320.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-arm640.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.35.2indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.35.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-android-arm641.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-darwin-arm641.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-darwin-x641.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-linux-arm64-musl1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-linux-riscv64-gnu1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-linux-x64-gnu1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-linux-x64-musl1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/canvas-win32-x64-msvc1.0.5indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.143.0indirect
npm@poppinss/colors4.1.6indirect
npm@poppinss/dumper0.6.5indirect
npm@poppinss/exception1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is7.2.0indirect
npm@speed-highlight/core1.2.15indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node26.2.0indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmblake3-wasm2.1.5indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcookie1.1.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmerror-stack-parser-es1.0.5indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmminiflare5.20260801.1-alphaindirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp6.3.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmrolldown1.2.3indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsharp0.35.2indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmsupports-color10.2.2indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.1.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtsx4.23.11indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici7.29.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmunenv2.0.0-rc.24indirect
npmvite8.2.1indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmworkerd1.20260801.1indirect
npmwrangler4.120.0indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyouch4.1.0-beta.10indirect
npmyouch-core0.3.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:pxpipe-proxy@0.13.2 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.