Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 12:20 UTC

terraform-linters / tflint-ruleset-opa

Experimental: TFLint ruleset plugin for writing custom rules in Rego.

Go · Open Policy AgentMPL-2.0★ 86 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

terraform-linters/tflint-ruleset-opa holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Terraform LintersOrganization
128 followers17 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/terraform-linters/tflint-ruleset-opav0.11.0-1156 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
16.7/18Commit volume — 72 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year72
human_commit_share0.21
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year42
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~133.1 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv0.11.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases133.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.3/60Stars — 86 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars86
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.944
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance — 216/231 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs216
open_issues2
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.867
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.2/25Owner reach — 128 followers of terraform-linters
21.1/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers128
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginterraform-linters
public_repos17
account_age_days2,585

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 56 days ago
20/20Version history — 11 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/terraform-linters/tflint-ruleset-opa
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraform, tflint, tflint-ruleset
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
4/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages61
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 61 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://www.openpolicyagent.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 18 of 21 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://www.openpolicyagent.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.857
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 79 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, tools/release/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.79
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes43,886
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

86GitHub stars
4contributors
72commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612023-032024-092026-03
Major 0Minor 9Patch 0

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 12:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 3/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
8SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/liamg/memoryfsv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opav1.19.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/terraform-linters/tflint-plugin-sdkv0.25.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.19.0go.mod
All dependencies 61

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 53 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0direct
Gogithub.com/liamg/memoryfsv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opav1.19.1direct
Gogithub.com/terraform-linters/tflint-plugin-sdkv0.25.0direct
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/agnivade/levenshteinv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v17v17.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/globv0.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v6969.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-querystring1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-pluginv1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-version1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamuxv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagicv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsigv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsig-secp256k1v1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httpccv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httprc/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v3v3.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/option/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/runv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metricsv0.0.0-20250401214520-65e299d6c5c9indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/tchap/go-patricia/v2v2.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjsonv1.6.10indirect
Gogithub.com/vektah/gqlparser/v2v2.5.36indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.3.5indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointerv0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreferencev0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Gogithub.com/yashtewari/glob-intersectionv0.2.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.4indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.28.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.48.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaaindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.2indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 61 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirectunknown30.56.0
golang.org/x/modv0.38.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.