Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 17:13 UTC

thecodingmachine / safe

All PHP functions, rewritten to throw exceptions instead of returning false

PHPMIT★ 2,496 stars⑂ 169 forkssince Sep 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

thecodingmachine/safe holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (82/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (46/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TheCodingMachineOrganization
200 followers343 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistthecodingmachine/safev3.4.07,736,98668203 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

58Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18Commit volume30 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year30
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases63 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 193 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~136.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count63
latest_release_tagv3.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release193
mean_days_between_releases136.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
55.1/60Stars2,496 stars
18.5/25Forks169 forks
8.2/15Watchers31 watchers
Inputs used
forks169
stars2,496
watchers31
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads7,736,986 downloads/month across packagist
17.8/20Registry dependents465 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesthecodingmachine/safe
dependents465
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads125,976,869
monthly_downloads7,736,986
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 33% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth56 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 34 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled56
top_contributor_share0.332
How it's scored
35.8/42Issue resolution85% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance428/525 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs428
open_issues32
closed_issues184
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d10
prs_decided_30d12
issue_closed_ratio0.852
closed_unmerged_prs97
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.6/25Owner reach200 followers of thecodingmachine
25/25Track record343 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers200
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginthecodingmachine
public_repos343
account_age_days5,187
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 203 days ago
20/20Version history68 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesthecodingmachine/safe
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish203

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests23 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, functions, exceptions
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2/2.5CI-Tests23 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 34 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages40
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 40 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.6/40Legible commit history58 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.592
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/54 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes21,507
source_files_sampled54
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2,496GitHub stars
56contributors
30commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
63releases
2bus factor
32open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'thecodingmachine/safe-generator' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 169 ⇿
0Stars
169Forks
63Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020016672018-092022-082026-07
Major 2Minor 12Patch 39

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 17:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests23 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 34 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistsymfony/console^7.2generator/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.2generator/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/finder^7.2generator/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^7.2generator/composer.json
All dependencies 47

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistsymfony/console7.2.6direct
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.2.0direct
Packagistsymfony/finder7.2.2direct
Packagistsymfony/process7.2.5direct
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lintindirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint1.4.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.15indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage12.5.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator6.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template5.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer8.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit12.5.14indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistrector/rectorindirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser4.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator7.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment8.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state8.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context7.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type6.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/version6.0.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesnifferindirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.11.3indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.2.0indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safeindirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 40 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer3.11.3indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.