Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 08:02 UTC

thothforge / thothctl

A command line interface tool designed for efficient management and automation within your internal developer platform.

PythonCustom license★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverNetwork servicehow this is determined
#devops-tools#devsecops#framework#iac#internal-development#platform-engineering#python#template

thothforge/thothctl holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (35/100). It was last updated 17 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Thoth ForgeOrganization
4 followers11 public repossince Feb 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIthothctl0.28.13,41517817 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 17 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 423 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year423
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push17
active_weeks_last_year35

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.28.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

64Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
47.1/80Monthly downloads — 3,415 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesthothctl
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,415
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

35Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

46Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of thothforge
11.1/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginthothforge
public_repos11
account_age_days586

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history — 178 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesthothctl
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

85Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdevops-tools, devsecops, framework, iac, internal-development, platform-engineering, python, template
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

64Moderate
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
5.6/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: asteval 1.0.5 (high 8.4), ipython 7.16.1 (high 8.2), urllib3 1.26.20 (high 7.5), +1 more
23.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,695 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories22
affected_packages4
assessed_packages175
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the pypi:thothctl@0.28.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 175 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 3/438 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes129,929
source_files_sampled438
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

4GitHub stars
1contributors
423commits, last 12 months
17days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 08:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick>=8.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorama>=0.4.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml<7.0.0,>=6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyfiglet>=1.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIjson2html>=1.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIargparse>=1.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIzipp>=3.19.2pyproject.toml
PyPIjunit2html>=30.1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIjunitparser>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpymsteams>=0.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIxmltodict>=0.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgitdb>=4.0.11pyproject.toml
PyPIGitPython>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-devops==7.1.0b4pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3>=1.34.0pyproject.toml
PyPIterraform-compliance>=1.3.48pyproject.toml
PyPIcheckov==3.2.451pyproject.toml
PyPIpre-commit>=3.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIbc-python-hcl2>=0.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPIargcomplete>=3.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPItoml>=0.10.2pyproject.toml
PyPIinquirer>=3.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpytest>=8.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpytest-cov>=5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil—pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=41.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.104.0pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpywin32>=306pyproject.toml
All dependencies 37

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 32 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIargcomplete—direct
PyPIargparse—direct
PyPIazure-devops7.1.0b4direct
PyPIbc-python-hcl2—direct
PyPIboto3—direct
PyPIcheckov3.2.451direct
PyPIclick—direct
PyPIcolorama—direct
PyPIcryptography—direct
PyPIfastapi—direct
PyPIgitdb—direct
PyPIgitpython—direct
PyPIinquirer—direct
PyPIjson2html—direct
PyPIjunit2html—direct
PyPIjunitparser—direct
PyPImcp—direct
PyPIpre-commit—direct
PyPIpsutil—direct
PyPIpyfiglet—direct
PyPIpymsteams—direct
PyPIpytest—direct
PyPIpytest-cov—direct
PyPIpywin32—direct
PyPIpyyaml—direct
PyPIrequests—direct
PyPIrich—direct
PyPIterraform-compliance—direct
PyPItoml—direct
PyPIuvicorn—direct
PyPIxmltodict—direct
PyPIzipp—direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api—indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc—indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-logging—indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk—indirect
PyPIzensical—indirect
Dependency advisories 4

Installing pypi:thothctl@0.28.1 pulls in 175 packages, direct and transitive: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
asteval1.0.5indirecthigh61.0.9
ipython7.16.1indirecthigh48.10.0
urllib31.26.20indirecthigh102.7.0
diskcache5.6.3indirectmoderate2—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with thothforge/thothctl. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99reflex-dev/reflex🕸️ Web apps in pure Python 🐍Exceptional99django/djangoThe Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.Exceptional99ag2ai/faststreamAsynchronous Python framework for event-driven services. A thin client for Kafka, RabbitMQ, NATS, Redis and MQTT with full access to native broker features, plus AsyncAPI docs, in-memory tests and observability out of the box.Exceptional99prowler-cloud/prowlerProwler is the world’s most widely used open-source cloud security platform that automates security and compliance across any cloud environment.Exceptional98openai/openai-agents-pythonA lightweight, powerful framework for multi-agent workflowsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.