Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 13:50 UTC

thoughtsideas / wp-infrastructure

PHP · MakefileMIT★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

thoughtsideas/wp-infrastructure holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated 28 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Thoughts & IdeasOrganization
2 followers12 public repossince Apr 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistthoughtsideas/wp-infrastructure0.3.16,503729 days agowordpress

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 28 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
14.8/18Commit volume — 43 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year43
human_commit_share0.54
days_since_last_push28
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 28 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~120.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tag0.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release28
mean_days_between_releases120.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

53Moderate
How it's scored
50.8/80Monthly downloads — 6,503 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesthoughtsideas/wp-infrastructure
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads98,716
monthly_downloads6,503
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

42Weak
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
18.7/30PR acceptance — 43/69 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs43
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of thoughtsideas
20.1/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginthoughtsideas
public_repos12
account_age_days3,796

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history — 7 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesthoughtsideas/wp-infrastructure
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

30At Risk
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages107
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 107 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1.1/40Legible commit history — 1 of 47 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.021
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 87
8/8Automated maintenance — 40 of the last 87 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.46

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes4,256
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
43commits, last 12 months
28days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2025-02-02: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 1 stars today.
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'thoughtsideas/tools' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 1 ★ / 1 ⇿
1Stars
1Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2025-02-02. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

0001111112024-092024-112025-02
Major 0Minor 2Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 13:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistpsr/container^2.0composer.json
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalize^2.52tools/composer.json
Packagistvatu/dev-toolsdev-trunk@devtools/composer.json
All dependencies 109

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 106 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalize2.52.0direct
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2direct
Packagistvatu/dev-tools—direct
Packagistantecedent/patchwork2.2.3indirect
Packagistbrain/monkey2.7.0indirect
Packagistcaptainhook/captainhook5.29.2indirect
Packagistcaptainhook/hook-installer1.0.5indirect
Packagistcaptainhook/secrets0.9.7indirect
Packagistclue/stream-filter1.7.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/installers2.3.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistergebnis/json1.6.0indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-normalizer4.10.1indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-pointer3.8.0indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-printer3.8.1indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-schema-validator4.5.1indirect
Packagistglobtec/phpadr2.0.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.15.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.13.0indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.1.1indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.8.2indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.9.0indirect
Packagistknplabs/github-api3.16.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-diactoros3.8.0indirect
Packagistlocalheinz/diff1.3.0indirect
Packagistm4tthumphrey/php-gitlab-api11.14.0indirect
Packagistmadewithlove/license-checker1.6indirect
Packagistmarc-mabe/php-enum4.7.2indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphly/keep-a-changelog2.13.2indirect
Packagistphp-http/cache-plugin2.1.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/client-common2.7.3indirect
Packagistphp-http/discovery1.20.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/guzzle7-adapter1.1.0indirect
Packagistphp-http/httplug2.4.1indirect
Packagistphp-http/message1.16.2indirect
Packagistphp-http/multipart-stream-builder1.4.2indirect
Packagistphp-http/promise1.3.1indirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-console-color1.0.1indirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-console-highlighter1.0.0indirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint1.4.0indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/php-compatibility—indirect
Packagistphpcsstandards/phpcsextra1.5.0indirect
Packagistphpcsstandards/phpcsutils1.2.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer1.4.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit2.0.18indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage11.0.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator5.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker5.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template4.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit11.5.56indirect
Packagistpovils/phpmnd3.6.1indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.5.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator6.3.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment7.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter6.3.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code3.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator6.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context6.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type5.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/version5.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastianfeldmann/camino0.9.5indirect
Packagistsebastianfeldmann/cli3.4.2indirect
Packagistsebastianfeldmann/git3.16.0indirect
Packagistshipmonk/composer-dependency-analyser1.8.4indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.31.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console5.4.47indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml5.4.53indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml7.4.13indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Packagistyoast/phpunit-polyfills4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 107 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with thoughtsideas/wp-infrastructure. Read them side by side →

99WordPress/gutenbergThe Block Editor project for WordPress and beyond. Plugin is available from the official repository.Exceptional98Yoast/wordpress-seoYoast SEO for WordPressExceptional98Automattic/wp-calypsoThe JavaScript and API powered WordPress.comExceptional9610up/ElasticPressA fast and flexible search and query engine for WordPress.Exceptional95wp-graphql/wp-graphql:rocket: GraphQL API for WordPressExceptional94woocommerce/woocommerceA customizable, open-source ecommerce platform built on WordPress. Build any commerce solution you can imagine.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.