Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-27 21:18 UTC

tidev / ioslib

IOS Utilities Library

JavaScriptCustom license★ 72 stars⑂ 35 forkssince Jun 2014View on GitHub ↗

tidev/ioslib holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (66/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated 32 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TiDevOrganization
86 followers110 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmioslib6.0.12,57320432 days agoappceleratorioswatchosiphoneipadxcodeapple

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 32 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
11.7/18Commit volume — 19 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year19
human_commit_share0.9
days_since_last_push32
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 32 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~88.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv6.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release32
mean_days_between_releases88.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30/60Stars — 72 stars
12.8/25Forks — 35 forks
9.8/15Watchers — 58 watchers
Inputs used
forks35
stars72
watchers58
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.5/80Monthly downloads — 2,573 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesioslib
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,573
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 66% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.656
How it's scored
32.1/42Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed
19.2/30PR acceptance — 152/237 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs152
open_issues4
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.765
closed_unmerged_prs85
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.9/25Owner reach — 86 followers of tidev
25/25Track record — 110 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers86
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintidev
public_repos110
account_age_days4,674

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 32 days ago
20/20Version history — 204 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesioslib
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish32

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnpm-package
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 56 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
4.6/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 8 affected: debug 0.7.4 (high 7.5), form-data 2.3.3 (high 7.5), semver 7.3.8 (high 7.5), +5 more
16.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 8 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,971 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages8
assessed_packages86
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 5, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:ioslib@6.0.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 86 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 72 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.8
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.1
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/46 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes75,624
source_files_sampled46
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

72GitHub stars
17contributors
19commits, last 12 months
32days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 35 ⇿
0Stars
35Forks
20Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383522014-062020-032026-01
Major 2Minor 4Patch 14

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-27 21:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 6/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities56 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmalways-tail0.2.0package.json
npmasync^3.2.6package.json
npmbplist-parser0.3.2package.json
npmdebug^4.3.4package.json
npmnode-appc^1.1.7package.json
All dependencies 167

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 160 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmalways-tail0.2.0direct
npmasync3.2.6direct
npmbplist-parser0.3.2direct
npmdebug0.7.4direct
npmdebug4.3.1direct
npmdebug4.3.4direct
npmnode-appc1.1.7direct
npm@ungap/promise-all-settled1.1.2indirect
npm@xmldom/xmldom0.8.6indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex2.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.2indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmasn10.2.4indirect
npmassert-plus1.0.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmat-least-node1.0.0indirect
npmaws-sign20.7.0indirect
npmaws41.10.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.0indirect
npmbcrypt-pbkdf1.0.2indirect
npmbig-integer1.6.48indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmbuffer-crc320.2.13indirect
npmcamelcase6.2.0indirect
npmcaseless0.12.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar3.5.1indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcode-point-at1.1.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolors1.4.0indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.2indirect
npmdashdash1.14.1indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdiff5.0.0indirect
npmecc-jsbn0.1.2indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmextsprintf1.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfd-slicer1.1.0indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmforever-agent0.6.1indirect
npmform-data2.3.3indirect
npmfs-extra9.1.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmgetpass0.1.7indirect
npmglob7.1.4indirect
npmglob7.1.6indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.4indirect
npmgrowl1.10.5indirect
npmhar-schema2.0.0indirect
npmhar-validator5.1.5indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmhttp-signature1.2.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.3indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point1.0.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.1indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-typedarray1.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisstream0.1.2indirect
npmjs-yaml4.0.0indirect
npmjsbn0.1.1indirect
npmjson-schema0.2.3indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stringify-safe5.0.1indirect
npmjsonfile6.0.1indirect
npmjsprim1.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.0.0indirect
npmlru-cache6.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.44.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.27indirect
npmminimatch3.0.4indirect
npmminimist0.0.8indirect
npmmkdirp0.5.1indirect
npmmocha8.4.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.1.20indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnumber-is-nan1.0.1indirect
npmoauth-sign0.9.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmperformance-now2.1.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpsl1.8.0indirect
npmpunycode2.1.1indirect
npmqs6.5.2indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.5.0indirect
npmrequest2.88.2indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrimraf2.6.3indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.3.8indirect
npmserialize-javascript5.0.1indirect
npmshould13.2.3indirect
npmshould-equal2.0.0indirect
npmshould-format3.0.3indirect
npmshould-type1.4.0indirect
npmshould-type-adaptors1.1.0indirect
npmshould-util1.0.0indirect
npmsprintf0.1.5indirect
npmsshpk1.16.1indirect
npmstring-width1.0.2indirect
npmstring-width4.2.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi3.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtemp0.9.4indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtough-cookie2.5.0indirect
npmtunnel-agent0.6.0indirect
npmtweetnacl0.14.5indirect
npmuniversalify1.0.0indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.0indirect
npmuuid3.4.0indirect
npmuuid9.0.0indirect
npmverror1.10.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwide-align1.1.3indirect
npmworkerpool6.1.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.4indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyauzl2.10.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 8

Installing npm:ioslib@6.0.1 pulls in 86 packages, direct and transitive: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
debug0.7.4indirecthigh24.3.1
form-data2.3.3indirecthigh24.0.6
semver7.3.8indirecthigh17.5.2
uuid3.4.0indirecthigh113.0.1
uuid9.0.1indirecthigh113.0.1
qs6.5.5indirectmoderate26.16.0
request2.88.2indirectmoderate13.0.0
tough-cookie2.5.0indirectmoderate14.1.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.