Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 00:44 UTC

timvink / mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin

MkDocs plugin to add a last updated date to your site pages

PythonMIT★ 268 stars⑂ 54 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginhow this is determined
#mkdocs#mkdocs-plugin#timeago#git#mkdocs-material

timvink/mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated 36 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Tim VinkPersonal account
70 followers27 public repossince Sep 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPImkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin1.5.3-5645 days agomkdocsplugin

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

55Moderate
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 36 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18Commit volume — 67 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year67
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push36
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 58 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 45 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~50.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count58
latest_release_tagv1.5.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release45
mean_days_between_releases50.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

56Moderate
How it's scored
39.4/60Stars — 268 stars
14.4/25Forks — 54 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks54
stars268
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 75% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 40 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled40
top_contributor_share0.753

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance — 87/99 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs87
open_issues0
closed_issues115
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.3/25Owner reach — 70 followers of timvink
22.5/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers70
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logintimvink
public_repos27
account_age_days4,673
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 45 days ago
20/20Version history — 56 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish45

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://timvink.github.io/mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin/index.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmkdocs, mkdocs-plugin, timeago, git, mkdocs-material
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://timvink.github.io/mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin/index.html
docs_sitehttps://timvink.github.io/mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin/index.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

53Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes29,576
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

268GitHub stars
40contributors
67commits, last 12 months
36days since last push
58releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 00:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIbabel>=2.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgitpython>=3.1.44pyproject.toml
PyPImkdocs>=1.0,<2pyproject.toml
PyPItzdata>=2023.3pyproject.toml
All dependencies 66

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 62 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbabel2.17.0direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.50direct
PyPImkdocs1.6.1direct
PyPItzdata2025.2direct
PyPIbackrefs5.9indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.10.5indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclick8.2.1indirect
PyPIcodecov2.1.13indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.11.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.3indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.16indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkdown3.9indirect
PyPImarkdown-graphviz-inline1.1.3indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdx-truly-sane-lists1.3indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-gen-files0.5.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-git-authors-plugin0.10.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.6indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-monorepo-plugin1.1.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-redirects1.2.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-static-i18n1.3.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-techdocs-core1.6.2indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIplantuml-markdown3.11.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.5.1indirect
PyPIprek0.3.0indirect
PyPIproperdocs1.6.7indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.21.3indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIruff0.14.4indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm—indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.2indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItomli2.3.0indirect
PyPIty0.0.13indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.36.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with timvink/mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin. Read them side by side →

84Guts/mkdocs-rss-pluginMkDocs plugin to generate a RSS feeds for created and updated pages, using git log and YAML frontmatter (page.meta).Excellent83ewels/mkdocs-quizMkdocs plugin to create simple quizzes in markdownExcellent92privacyguides/privacyguides.orgProtect your data against global mass surveillance programs.Excellent84mkdocstrings/mkdocstrings:blue_book: Automatic documentation from sources, for MkDocs.Excellent92ekristen/aws-nukeRemove all the resources from an AWS accountExcellent99go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.