Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 09:04 UTC

tomatome / grdp

pure golang rdp protocol

GoGPL-3.0★ 230 stars⑂ 84 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗

tomatome/grdp holds a health index of 17 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (55/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). It was last updated 1044 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

17
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

17
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

tomatomePersonal account
11 followers40 public repossince Nov 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/tomatome/grdpv0.1.0-11529 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 1,044 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1,044
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,418 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,418
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.3/60Stars230 stars
16/25Forks84 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks84
stars230
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 50% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.5
How it's scored
21.9/42Issue resolution52% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance0/2 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues11
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.522
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
7.8/25Owner reach11 followers of tomatome
23.7/25Track record40 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logintomatome
public_repos40
account_age_days4,321
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,529 days ago
4/20Version history1 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/tomatome/grdp
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,529

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsprotocol, golang
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto 0.0.0-20220622213112-05595931fe9d (critical 10.0)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,006 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories62
affected_packages3
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 18 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1.7/40Legible commit history3 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.031
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapvendor/github.com/googollee/go-socket.io/Makefile, vendor/github.com/googollee/go-socket.io/engineio/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 96
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesvendor/github.com/googollee/go-socket.io/Makefile, vendor/github.com/googollee/go-socket.io/engineio/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes1/54 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes483,159
source_files_sampled54
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

230GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,044days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
11open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 84 ⇿
0Stars
84Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050606032021-072024-022026-08
Major 0Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.3 / 10
1.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 09:04 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/google/gxuiv0.0.0-20151028112939-f85e0a97b3a4go.mod
Gogithub.com/googollee/go-socket.iov1.4.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/huin/asn1berv0.0.0-20120622192748-af09f62e6358go.mod
Gogithub.com/icodeface/tlsv0.0.0-20190904083142-17aec93c60e5go.mod
Gogithub.com/lunixbochs/strucv0.0.0-20200707160740-784aaebc1d40go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/w32v0.0.0-20160930032740-bb4de0191aa4go.mod
Gogithub.com/tomatome/winv0.3.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.0.0-20220622213112-05595931fe9dgo.mod
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/gxui0.0.0-20151028112939-f85e0a97b3a4direct
Gogithub.com/googollee/go-socket.io1.4.4direct
Gogithub.com/huin/asn1ber0.0.0-20120622192748-af09f62e6358direct
Gogithub.com/icodeface/tls0.0.0-20190904083142-17aec93c60e5direct
Gogithub.com/lunixbochs/struc0.0.0-20200707160740-784aaebc1d40direct
Gogithub.com/shirou/w320.0.0-20160930032740-bb4de0191aa4direct
Gogithub.com/tomatome/win0.3.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20220622213112-05595931fe9ddirect
Gogithub.com/go-gl/gl0.0.0-20211210172815-726fda9656d6indirect
Gogithub.com/go-gl/glfw/v3.3/glfw0.0.0-20220622232848-a6c407ee30a0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/freetype0.0.0-20170609003504-e2365dfdc4a0indirect
Gogithub.com/gopherjs/gopherjs1.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocket1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/goxjs/gl0.0.0-20210104184919-e3fafc6f8f2aindirect
Gogithub.com/goxjs/glfw0.0.0-20220119044647-4bcee99381f2indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.5.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/image0.0.0-20220617043117-41969df76e82indirect
Gohonnef.co/go/js/dom0.0.0-20210725211120-f030747120f2indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 18 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20220622213112-05595931fe9ddirectcritical413.4.0
golang.org/x/image0.0.0-20220617043117-41969df76e82indirecthigh190.45.0
github.com/gorilla/websocket1.4.2indirectmoderate21.5.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.