Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.6.0 · 2026-08-12 22:48 UTC

tortoise / tortoise-orm

Familiar asyncio ORM for python, built with relations in mind

PythonApache-2.0★ 5,611 stars⑂ 500 forkssince Mar 2018View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#orm #asyncio #async #python3 #sqlite #postgresql #mysql

tortoise/tortoise-orm holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (66/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TortoiseOrganization

94 followers9 public repossince Aug 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	tortoise-orm	1.1.8	-	182	2 days ago	sql mysql postgres psql sqlite aiosqlite asyncpg relational database rdbms orm object-mapper async asyncio aio psycopg

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 2 days ago
24.2/36	Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 120 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	120
human_commit_share	0.82
days_since_last_push	2
active_weeks_last_year	35

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~20.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	1.1.8
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	2
mean_days_between_releases	20.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

85Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

92Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 5,611 stars
22.5/25	Forks — 500 forks
9/15	Watchers — 43 watchers

Inputs used

forks	500
stars	5,611
watchers	43
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	coveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.303

Issue & PR responsiveness

62Moderate

How it's scored

26.4/42	Issue resolution — 63% of issues closed
23.6/30	PR acceptance — 639/814 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
12/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

merged_prs	639
open_issues	470
closed_issues	796
prs_merged_7d	2
prs_decided_7d	2
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	3
issue_closed_ratio	0.629
closed_unmerged_prs	175
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
14.2/25	Owner reach — 94 followers of tortoise
19.3/25	Track record — 9 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	94
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	tortoise
public_repos	9
account_age_days	2,910

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20	Version history — 182 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	tortoise-orm
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://tortoise.github.io
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	orm, asyncio, async, python3, sqlite, postgresql, mysql
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://tortoise.github.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5	Code-Review — Found 17/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	5
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:tortoise-orm@1.1.8 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 5 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 74 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.902
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tortoise/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 18 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tortoise/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.03
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.18

Code legibility for models

81Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (tortoise/py.typed)
54.4/55	Manageable file sizes — 5/448 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	95,040
source_files_sampled	448
oversized_source_files	5

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—

Key facts

5,611GitHub stars

99contributors

120commits, last 12 months

2days since last push

100releases

2bus factor

470open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 500 ⇿

0Stars

500Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 13Patch 85

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10

5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-12 22:48 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8	Code-Review	Found 17/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10	Contributors	project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
4	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	pypika-tortoise	`(>=0.6.5,<1.0.0)`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	iso8601	`(>=2.1.0,<3.0.0)`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiosqlite	`(>=0.16.0,<1.0.0)`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	anyio	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tomlkit	`(>=0.11.4,<1.0.0)`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	typing-extensions	`(>= 4.1.0)`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 170

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 164 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	aiosqlite	`0.22.1`	direct
PyPI	anyio	`4.12.1`	direct
PyPI	iso8601	`2.1.0`	direct
PyPI	pypika-tortoise	`0.6.5`	direct
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.14.0`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	aiofiles	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiomysql	`0.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	alabaster	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	appdirs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	asgi-lifespan	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	async-timeout	`5.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	asyncmy	`0.2.12`	indirect
PyPI	asyncodbc	`0.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	asyncpg	`0.31.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`25.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-asyncio-runner	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-tarfile	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	bandit	`1.9.4`	indirect
PyPI	blacksheep	`2.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	blinker	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.2.25`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	ciso8601	`2.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	codespell	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.22.4`	indirect
PyPI	essentials	`1.1.9`	indirect
PyPI	essentials-openapi	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	fastapi	`0.135.0`	indirect
PyPI	flask	`3.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	guardpost	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	h2	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	hpack	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	html5tagger	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	hypercorn	`0.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	hyperframe	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	id	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	imagesize	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`8.38.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`9.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-pygments-lexers	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`8.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	itsdangerous	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.19.2`	indirect
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`10.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`1.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nest-asyncio	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	nh3	`0.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.7`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.8.6`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	priority	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.52`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg	`3.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg-binary	`3.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg-pool	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	ptpython	`3.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.12.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.41.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-extra-types	`2.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`4.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	pymysql	`1.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyodbc	`5.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-codspeed	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2025.2`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	quart	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	readme-renderer	`44.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.33.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`14.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	rodi	`2.0.8`	indirect
PyPI	roman-numerals	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.4`	indirect
PyPI	sanic	`25.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	sanic-routing	`23.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	sanic-testing	`24.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`83.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`8.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-copybutton	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-immaterial	`0.13.9`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`0.52.1`	indirect
PyPI	stevedore	`5.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	taskgroup	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	tracerite	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	types-pymysql	`1.1.0.20251220`	indirect
PyPI	types-pytz	`2025.2.0.20251108`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20250915`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2025.3`	indirect
PyPI	ujson	`5.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect
PyPI	werkzeug	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	wsproto	`1.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.22.0`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:tortoise-orm@1.1.8 pulls in 5 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.6.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records