Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 08:01 UTC

tox-dev / toml-fmt

Format Python TOML configurations.

Rust · PythonMIT★ 85 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

tox-dev/toml-fmt holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (97/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (68/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

143 followers50 public repossince Jul 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iocommon0.1.011812661 days ago—
PyPItox-toml-fmt1.10.3145,9022510 days agoformatpyproject
PyPIpyproject-fmt2.29.4765,1291093 days agoformatpyproject
PyPItoml-fmt-common1.3.5391,05710105 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

97Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 374 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year374
human_commit_share0.79
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year45

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 78 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count78
latest_release_tagpyproject-fmt/2.29.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases1.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.2/60Stars — 85 stars
10.7/25Forks — 20 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks20
stars85
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,302,088 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestox-toml-fmt, pyproject-fmt, toml-fmt-common
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,302,088
unverified_packages_excludedcommon
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.942
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 332/362 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs332
open_issues0
closed_issues96
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d20
prs_decided_30d20
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.5/25Owner reach — 143 followers of tox-dev
24.4/25Track record — 50 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers143
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintox-dev
public_repos50
account_age_days3,718

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 109 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescommon, tox-toml-fmt, pyproject-fmt, toml-fmt-common
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 11 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rustfmt.toml, Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), toml-doc/Cargo.toml ([lints])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://tox-toml-fmt.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsformatter, pyo3, python, toml
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://tox-toml-fmt.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
2/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: bincode 1.3.3 (unknown)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 269 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the crates:common@0.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 10 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://pyproject-fmt.readthedocs.io/llms.txt)
35.8/40Legible commit history — 53 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://pyproject-fmt.readthedocs.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.671
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, common/Cargo.toml, pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rustfmt.toml, Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), toml-doc/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checking — pyproject-fmt/src/pyproject_fmt/py.typed, toml-fmt-common/src/toml_fmt_common/py.typed, tox-toml-fmt/src/tox_toml_fmt/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 17 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspyproject-fmt/src/pyproject_fmt/py.typed, toml-fmt-common/src/toml_fmt_common/py.typed, tox-toml-fmt/src/tox_toml_fmt/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, common/Cargo.toml, pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml, toml-doc/Cargo.toml, tox-rules/Cargo.toml, tox-toml-fmt/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.17
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 2/165 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes106,422
source_files_sampled165
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

85GitHub stars
15contributors
374commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
78releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'toml-doc' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'tox-rules' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'tox-toml-fmt' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'pyproject-fmt' from its registry
  • pypi download statistics for 'pyproject-fmt' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for pyproject-fmt carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 20 ⇿
0Stars
20Forks
61Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216202022024-102025-082026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 08:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
4SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iolexical-sort0.3.1common/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.13.1common/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml-doc—common/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3common/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2common/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.29.2common/Cargo.toml
crates.iocommon—pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml-doc—pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iotox-rules—pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.13.1pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iospdx0.13.5pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.29.2pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iolexical-sort0.3.1pyproject-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml_parser—toml-doc/Cargo.toml
crates.iocommon—tox-rules/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml-doc—tox-rules/Cargo.toml
crates.iolexical-sort0.3.1tox-rules/Cargo.toml
crates.iocommon—tox-toml-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml-doc—tox-toml-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iotox-rules—tox-toml-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.29.2tox-toml-fmt/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.13.1tox-toml-fmt/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 197

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 184 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iolexical-sort—direct
crates.iolexical-sort0.3.1direct
crates.iopyo3—direct
crates.iopyo30.29.2direct
crates.ioregex—direct
crates.ioregex1.13.1direct
crates.iospdx—direct
crates.iospdx0.13.5direct
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.3+spec-1.1.0direct
crates.iounicode-segmentation—direct
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3direct
crates.iounicode-width—direct
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioany_ascii0.1.7indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioconsole0.16.4indirect
crates.ioencode_unicode1.0.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.5.0indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioinclude_dir0.7.4indirect
crates.ioinclude_dir_macros0.7.4indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.1indirect
crates.ioindoc—indirect
crates.ioindoc2.0.7indirect
crates.ioinsta—indirect
crates.ioinsta1.48.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopest2.9.0indirect
crates.iopest_derive2.9.0indirect
crates.iopest_generator2.9.0indirect
crates.iopest_meta2.9.0indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.15.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.iopyo3-build-config0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-ffi0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros-backend0.29.2indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.iosimilar2.7.0indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.4indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotoml—indirect
crates.iotoml1.1.4+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml-test-data—indirect
crates.iotoml-test-data2.14.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.ioucd-trie0.1.7indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.4indirect
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIcheck-wheel-contents—indirect
PyPIcheck-wheel-contents0.6.3indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcovdefaults—indirect
PyPIcovdefaults2.3.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.5indirect
PyPIfuro—indirect
PyPIfuro2025.12.19indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImaturin—indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImypy2.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.7indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpre-commit-uv—indirect
PyPIpre-commit-uv4.3.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock—indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.0indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer46.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.2indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-argparse-cli—indirect
PyPIsphinx-argparse-cli1.23.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints—indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.13.4indirect
PyPIsphinx-basic-ng1.0.0b2indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton—indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design—indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-inline-tabs—indirect
PyPIsphinx-inline-tabs2025.12.21.14indirect
PyPIsphinx-llm—indirect
PyPIsphinx-llm1.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-markdown-builder0.6.11indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItoml-fmt-common—indirect
PyPItoml-fmt-common1.3.5indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItrove-classifiers—indirect
PyPItrove-classifiers2026.6.1.19indirect
PyPItwine—indirect
PyPItwine7.0.0indirect
PyPItypes-cachetools—indirect
PyPItypes-cachetools7.0.0.20260713indirect
PyPItypes-chardet—indirect
PyPItypes-chardet5.0.4.6indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuv—indirect
PyPIuv0.12.8indirect
PyPIuv-build—indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.7indirect
PyPIwheel-filename1.4.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing crates:common@0.1.0 pulls in 10 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
bincode1.3.3directunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.