Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-15 11:27 UTC

trendvidia / protowire

ProtoWire is a serialization toolkit built around PXF (Proto eXpressive Format), SBE (Simple Binary Encoding), and a cross-port Envelope. PXF is a human-friendly text serialization format; SBE is a fixed-offset binary format (ultra-low-latency). Both are backed by protobuf schemas.

GoMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

trendvidia/protowire holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TrendVidiaPersonal account
0 followers28 public repossince Mar 2025TrendVidia, LLC

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/trendvidia/protowirev1.11.0-175 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

71Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 158 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year158
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 17 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv1.11.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases2.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good
How it's scored
35.8/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
28.9/30PR acceptance — 155/161 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs155
open_issues10
closed_issues58
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d10
prs_merged_30d55
prs_decided_30d55
issue_closed_ratio0.853
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

29At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of trendvidia
13.5/25Track record — 28 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logintrendvidia
public_repos28
account_age_days526
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/trendvidia/protowire
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://protowire.org
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://protowire.org
docs_sitehttps://protowire.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

66Good
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 87 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — editors/jetbrains/plugin/build.gradle.kts, go.mod, internal/schemaext/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — editors/vscode/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configseditors/vscode/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestseditors/jetbrains/plugin/build.gradle.kts, go.mod, internal/schemaext/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.13

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/83 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes56,267
source_files_sampled83
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — proto/docs/v1/pack.proto, proto/docs/v1/registry.proto, proto/docs/v1/topic.proto, proto/envelope/v1/envelope.proto, proto/openapi/v1/config.proto, proto/pxf/annotations.proto, proto/pxf/bignum.proto, proto/pxf/secret.proto, proto/sbe/annotations.proto, proto/schema/catalog/v1/catalog.proto, proto/schema/config/v1/config.proto, proto/schema/v1/annotations.proto, proto/schema/v1/descriptor.proto, proto/schema/v1/report.proto, testdata/adversarial/adversarial.proto, testdata/bench-test.proto, testdata/docs/grammar/schema.proto, testdata/keyed/keyed.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-enum-name.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-field-name.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-oneof-name.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-uppercase-ok.proto, testdata/openapi/store.proto, testdata/sbe-bench.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/01_basic.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/02_composition.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/03_message_and_field_annotations.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/04_required_and_default.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/05_error_overrides.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/06_cross_file_lib.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/06_cross_file_main.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/07_report_golden/myco/commons/types.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/07_report_golden/myco/commons/validator.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/07_report_golden/myco/users/user.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/09_wkt_refinements.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/10_literal_args.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/12_expression_args.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/13_declaration_shapes.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/14_refinement_kinds.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/15_collections_golden/inventory.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/16_sensitive_golden/credentials.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/17_missing_impl_golden/signup.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/18_default_unsatisfiable_golden/listing.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/19_catalog_miss/profile.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/20_sensitive_class.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/21_http_operation.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/22_http_additional_bindings.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/23_http_template_paths.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/arity_mismatch.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/container_alias.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/cyclic_alias.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/heterogeneous_list.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_empty_method.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_relative_path.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_repeated_template.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_unbalanced_template.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_unbound_template.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/map_field_in_literal.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/positional_after_named.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/reserved_sensitive_class.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/unbalanced_expression.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/undeclared_annotation.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/unknown_literal_field.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/untyped_list_element.proto, testdata/test.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesproto/docs/v1/pack.proto, proto/docs/v1/registry.proto, proto/docs/v1/topic.proto, proto/envelope/v1/envelope.proto, proto/openapi/v1/config.proto, proto/pxf/annotations.proto, proto/pxf/bignum.proto, proto/pxf/secret.proto, proto/sbe/annotations.proto, proto/schema/catalog/v1/catalog.proto, proto/schema/config/v1/config.proto, proto/schema/v1/annotations.proto, proto/schema/v1/descriptor.proto, proto/schema/v1/report.proto, testdata/adversarial/adversarial.proto, testdata/bench-test.proto, testdata/docs/grammar/schema.proto, testdata/keyed/keyed.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-enum-name.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-field-name.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-oneof-name.proto, testdata/lint/reserved-uppercase-ok.proto, testdata/openapi/store.proto, testdata/sbe-bench.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/01_basic.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/02_composition.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/03_message_and_field_annotations.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/04_required_and_default.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/05_error_overrides.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/06_cross_file_lib.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/06_cross_file_main.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/07_report_golden/myco/commons/types.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/07_report_golden/myco/commons/validator.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/07_report_golden/myco/users/user.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/09_wkt_refinements.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/10_literal_args.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/12_expression_args.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/13_declaration_shapes.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/14_refinement_kinds.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/15_collections_golden/inventory.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/16_sensitive_golden/credentials.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/17_missing_impl_golden/signup.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/18_default_unsatisfiable_golden/listing.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/19_catalog_miss/profile.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/20_sensitive_class.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/21_http_operation.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/22_http_additional_bindings.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/23_http_template_paths.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/arity_mismatch.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/container_alias.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/cyclic_alias.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/heterogeneous_list.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_empty_method.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_relative_path.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_repeated_template.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_unbalanced_template.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/http_unbound_template.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/map_field_in_literal.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/positional_after_named.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/reserved_sensitive_class.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/unbalanced_expression.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/undeclared_annotation.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/unknown_literal_field.proto, testdata/schema-extensions/invalid/untyped_list_element.proto, testdata/test.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
158commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
10open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-15 11:26 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/bufbuild/protocompilev0.14.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/itchyny/gojqv0.12.19go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/trendvidia/protocompilev0.24.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/trendvidia/protoregistryv0.72.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/trendvidia/protowire-gov1.3.2go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260807164820-c8921c73eeeago.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with trendvidia/protowire. Read them side by side →

100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional100cilium/ciliumeBPF-based Networking, Security, and ObservabilityExceptional100pingcap/tidbTiDB is built for agentic workloads that grow unpredictably, with ACID guarantees and native support for transactions, analytics, and vector search. No data silos. No noisy neighbors. No infrastructure ceiling.Exceptional100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.