Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 13:03 UTC

trevorsentilink / terraform-provider-postgresql

GoMPL-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

trevorsentilink/terraform-provider-postgresql holds a health index of 20 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (74/100) and lowest on Vitality (20/100). It was last updated 549 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

20
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

20
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Trevor HodgesPersonal account
0 followers2 public repossince Apr 2022SentiLink

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-postgresqlpoints to another repo — not scoredv1.7.1-172271 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 549 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push549
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 47 version tags (no GitHub releases)
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 711 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~90.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count47
latest_release_tagv1.25.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release711
mean_days_between_releases90.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

28At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

33At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.356
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of trevorsentilink
12.4/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logintrevorsentilink
public_repos2
account_age_days1,637
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 52 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
12/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: golang.org/x/oauth2 0.10.0 (high 7.5), golang.org/x/net 0.26.0 (moderate 6.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
29.6/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 669 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories79
affected_packages8
assessed_packages91
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 2, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 91 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 82 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.854
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, postgresql/GNUmakefile, tests/build/dummy_seclabel/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, postgresql/GNUmakefile, tests/build/dummy_seclabel/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/47 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes54,264
source_files_sampled47
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
99contributors
0commits, last 12 months
549days since last push
47releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • go package 'github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-postgresql' points at a different repository (https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-postgresql); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 13:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities52 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcorev1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentityv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.20.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.18.32go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.13.31go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/rds/authv1.2.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.21.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/blang/semverv3.5.1+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.26.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.10.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/sean-/postgresql-aclv0.0.0-20161225120419-d10489e5d217go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.9.0go.mod
Gogocloud.devv0.34.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.26.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.10.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.134.0go.mod
All dependencies 91

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 75 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v21.20.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config1.18.32direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentials1.13.31direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/rds/auth1.2.12direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sts1.21.1direct
Gogithub.com/azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcore1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/blang/semver3.5.1+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v22.26.1direct
Gogithub.com/lib/pq1.10.9direct
Gogithub.com/sean-/postgresql-acl0.0.0-20161225120419-d10489e5d217direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.9.0direct
Gogocloud.dev0.34.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/net0.26.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.10.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/api0.134.0direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute1.23.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata0.2.3indirect
Gocontrib.go.opencensus.io/integrations/ocsql0.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshtein1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v1313.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imds1.13.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsources1.1.37indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v22.4.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/ini1.3.38indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-url1.9.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sso1.13.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidc1.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-go1.14.0indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/internal1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/azuread/microsoft-authentication-library-for-go1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/color1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v55.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcache0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daindirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-go0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/wire0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxy0.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v22.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/cloudsql-proxy1.33.9indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrap1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-checkpoint0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cty1.4.1-0.20200414143053-d3edf31b6320indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclog1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierror1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-plugin1.4.10indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuid1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-version1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hc-install0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v22.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/logutils1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-exec0.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-json0.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go0.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-log0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-address0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchost0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamux0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/kylelemons/godebug1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorable0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.19indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructure1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrap1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalk1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/run1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/browser0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141cindirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack4.0.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v55.3.5indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v22.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-cty1.13.2indirect
Gogo.opencensus.io0.24.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomic1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierr1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zap1.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.31.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.28.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.3.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20230731193218-e0aa005b6bdfindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.57.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.33.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 91 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.31.0indirectcritical370.56.0
google.golang.org/grpc1.57.0indirectcritical121.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/oauth20.10.0directhigh20.27.0
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v55.2.1indirecthigh25.2.2
golang.org/x/net0.26.0directmoderate211.27.2
golang.org/x/mod0.17.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sys0.28.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.21.0indirectunknown20.41.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.