Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 08:03 UTC

trunk-rs / trunk

Build, bundle & ship your Rust WASM application to the web.

RustApache-2.0★ 4,376 stars⑂ 322 forkssince Aug 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#rust#wasm#bundler#assets#wasm-bindgen#html#scss#sass#build-tool#compiler

trunk-rs/trunk holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (79/100) and lowest on Security (43/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TrunkOrganization
37 followers1 public reposince May 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iotrunk0.21.1435,2339534 days agobuild-toolbundlercompilerwasmwebcommand-line-utilitiesweb-programming

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18Commit volume — 68 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year68
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

83Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 93 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 34 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~61.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count93
latest_release_tagv0.22.0-beta.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release34
mean_days_between_releases61.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

88Excellent
How it's scored
59.1/60Stars — 4,376 stars
20.9/25Forks — 322 forks
7.6/15Watchers — 24 watchers
Inputs used
forks322
stars4,376
watchers24
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

76Good
How it's scored
60.6/80Monthly downloads — 35,233 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestrunk
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads1,131,901
monthly_downloads35,233
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

44Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 50% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.502

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
34.1/42Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
22.9/30PR acceptance — 322/422 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs322
open_issues115
closed_issues495
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.811
closed_unmerged_prs100
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d3

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.4/25Owner reach — 37 followers of trunk-rs
12.7/25Track record — 1 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers37
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintrunk-rs
public_repos1
account_age_days1,927

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 34 days ago
20/20Version history — 95 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestrunk
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish34

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — clippy.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://trunk-rs.github.io/trunk/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, wasm, bundler, assets, wasm-bindgen, html, scss, sass, build-tool, compiler
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://trunk-rs.github.io/trunk/
docs_sitehttps://trunk-rs.github.io/trunk/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

43Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 13/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 81 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.81
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

67Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, examples/cargo-manifest/Cargo.toml, examples/cdylib/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — clippy.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, examples/cargo-manifest/Cargo.toml, examples/cdylib/Cargo.toml, examples/failing-rust/Cargo.toml, examples/hooks/Cargo.toml, examples/hooks/xtask/Cargo.toml, examples/initializer/Cargo.toml, examples/leptos/Cargo.toml, examples/node-module/Cargo.toml, examples/proxy/Cargo.toml, examples/seed/Cargo.toml, examples/target-path/Cargo.toml, examples/vanilla/Cargo.toml, examples/wasm_threads/Cargo.toml, examples/webworker-gloo/Cargo.toml, examples/webworker-module/Cargo.toml, examples/webworker/Cargo.toml, examples/yaml-config/Cargo.toml, examples/yew-tailwindcss/Cargo.toml, examples/yew-tls/Cargo.toml, examples/yew/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/116 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes37,902
source_files_sampled116
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

4,376GitHub stars
100contributors
68commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
93releases
1bus factor
115open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 322 ⇿
0Stars
322Forks
92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037531162020-082023-082026-08
Major 0Minor 20Patch 47

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 08:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests14 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 13/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 66
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioanyhow1Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-compression0.4.41Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-tar0.6Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.8Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum-server0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iobackon1Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.23Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1Cargo.toml
crates.iocargo-lock11Cargo.toml
crates.iocargo_metadata0.23Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap_complete4Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole0.16.2Cargo.toml
crates.iodirectories6Cargo.toml
crates.iodunce1Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioglobset0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iohickory-resolver0.26Cargo.toml
crates.iohtmlescape0.3.1Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp1.4Cargo.toml
crates.iohumantime2Cargo.toml
crates.iohumantime-serde1Cargo.toml
crates.iolocal-ip-address0.6Cargo.toml
crates.iolol_html2Cargo.toml
crates.iomime_guess2Cargo.toml
crates.iominify-html0.18Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify8Cargo.toml
crates.ionotify-debouncer-full0.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioopen5Cargo.toml
crates.iooxipng10Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.10Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.13Cargo.toml
crates.ioschemars1Cargo.toml
crates.ioseahash4Cargo.toml
crates.iosemver1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml=0.9.33Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.11Cargo.toml
crates.iostrum0.28Cargo.toml
crates.ioswc_common24Cargo.toml
crates.ioswc_ecma_ast26Cargo.toml
crates.ioswc_ecma_codegen29Cargo.toml
crates.ioswc_ecma_minifier58Cargo.toml
crates.ioswc_ecma_parser42Cargo.toml
crates.ioswc_ecma_transforms_base46Cargo.toml
crates.ioswc_ecma_visit26Cargo.toml
crates.iotar0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2Cargo.toml
crates.iotime0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-stream0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.30Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util0.7.18Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1Cargo.toml
crates.iotower-http0.7Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2Cargo.toml
crates.iowhich8Cargo.toml
crates.iozip8Cargo.toml
crates.iolightningcss=1.0.0-alpha.72Cargo.toml
crates.iocrates_io_api0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioopenssl0.10Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with trunk-rs/trunk. Read them side by side →

96web-infra-dev/rspackFast Rust-based bundler for the web with a modernized webpack API 🦀Exceptional98boa-dev/boaBoa is an embeddable Javascript engine written in Rust.Exceptional96slint-ui/slintSlint is an open-source declarative GUI toolkit to build native user interfaces for Rust, C++, JavaScript, or Python apps.Exceptional95actix/actix-netA collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.Exceptional100carbon-design-system/carbonA design system built by IBMExceptional96webpack/webpackA bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.