Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-21 11:30 UTC

trustin / os-maven-plugin

A Maven plugin that sets various useful properties detected from ${os.name} and ${os.arch} properties.

JavaApache-2.0★ 318 stars⑂ 69 forkssince Apr 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined

trustin/os-maven-plugin holds a health index of 18 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (56/100) and lowest on Vitality (15/100). It was last updated 858 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

18
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

18
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 36 is calibrated to 30 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Trustin LeePersonal account
2,981 followers42 public repossince Dec 2009@netty

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenkr.motd.maven:os-maven-plugin1.7.1-171382 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

15Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 858 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push858
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases5 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,382 days ago
5.4/27Release cadencea release every ~415.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagos-maven-plugin-1.7.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,382
mean_days_between_releases415.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.6/60Stars318 stars
15.3/25Forks69 forks
6.5/15Watchers16 watchers
Inputs used
forks69
stars318
watchers16
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 86% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth14 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.865
How it's scored
27.3/42Issue resolution65% of issues closed
15.5/30PR acceptance17/33 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 12/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs17
open_issues13
closed_issues24
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.649
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach2,981 followers of trustin
23.9/25Track record42 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,981
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logintrustin
public_repos42
account_age_days6,078
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on maven
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,382 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageskr.motd.maven:os-maven-plugin
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,382

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

21At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 12/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0.8/7.5Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
8.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: org.apache.maven:maven-core 3.5.3 (critical 9.1), org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils 3.1.0 (high)
3.6/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: org.apache.maven.shared:maven-shared-utils 3.2.1 (critical 9.8), commons-io:commons-io 2.5 (high 7.5), com.google.guava:guava 20.0 (moderate 5.9), +1 more
18.6/40No advisories left outstanding6 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,257 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories9
affected_packages6
assessed_packages49
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 2, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the maven:kr.motd.maven:os-maven-plugin@1.7.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 49 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14/40Legible commit history26 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.263
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrappom.xml, src/it/test-activate-profile/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml, src/it/test-activate-profile/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/8 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes17,245
source_files_sampled8
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

318GitHub stars
14contributors
0commits, last 12 months
858days since last push
5releases
1bus factor
13open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 69 ⇿
0Stars
69Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756832014-092020-082026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-21 11:30 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 12/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
1Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api3.5.3pom.xml
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.1.0pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2pom.xml
All dependencies 11

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api3.5.3direct
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.1.0direct
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugin-tools:maven-plugin-annotations3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-invoker-plugin3.2.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-core3.5.3indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:animal-sniffer-maven-plugin1.18indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:properties-maven-plugin1.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-metadata1.7.1indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse:ui3.3.0-I20070614-0800indirect
Dependency advisories 6

Installing maven:kr.motd.maven:os-maven-plugin@1.7.1 pulls in 49 packages, direct and transitive: 6 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
org.apache.maven:maven-core3.5.3directcritical13.8.1
org.apache.maven.shared:maven-shared-utils3.2.1indirectcritical13.3.3
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.1.0directhigh14.0.3
commons-io:commons-io2.5indirecthigh22.14.0
com.google.guava:guava20.0indirectmoderate332.0.0-android
org.apache.commons:commons-lang33.5indirectmoderate13.18.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.