Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 14:47 UTC

trustoverip / dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf

Trust Tasks - Transport Agnostic protocol for managing Tasks

Rust · TypeScriptCustom license★ 3 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

trustoverip/dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (81/100) and lowest on Security (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Trust over IPOrganization
124 followers111 public repossince Feb 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume230 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year230
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars3 stars
5/25Forks5 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars3
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.3/80Monthly downloads27,843 downloads/month across crates, npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestrust-tasks-rs, trust-tasks-tsp, @openvtc/trust-tasks, trust-tasks-https, trust-tasks-proof, trust-tasks-didcomm, trust-tasks-ceremony
dependents
ecosystemscrates, npm
total_downloads62,955
monthly_downloads27,843
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 97% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.974
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
29.6/30PR acceptance230/233 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance2/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs230
open_issues1
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d21
prs_decided_7d22
prs_merged_30d58
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.923
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.1/25Owner reach124 followers of trustoverip
25/25Track record111 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers124
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintrustoverip
public_repos111
account_age_days2,378

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable7 package(s) on crates, npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history90 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestrust-tasks-rs, trust-tasks-tsp, @openvtc/trust-tasks, trust-tasks-https, trust-tasks-proof, trust-tasks-didcomm, trust-tasks-ceremony
ecosystemscrates, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/trust-tasks-rs
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsssi
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/trust-tasks-rs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,700
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtrust-tasks-ts/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstrust-tasks-ts/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
52.9/55Manageable file sizes46/1,213 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes181,784
source_files_sampled1,213
oversized_source_files46
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3GitHub stars
5contributors
230commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'trust-tasks-codegen' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index crates:trust-tasks-rs@0.11.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345522026-052026-072026-08
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 14:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 74
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmajv^8.17.1package.json
npmajv-formats^3.0.1package.json
npmjson-schema-to-typescript^15.0.4package.json
npmyaml^2.5.1package.json
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.11trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json_canonicalizer0.3trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.iomultibase0.9trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml0.9trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iotypify0.6trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioschemars0.8trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprettyplease0.2trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.5trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.11trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-messaging-didcomm-v10.2trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.11trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-messaging-didcomm0.15trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.11trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.8trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.5trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.13trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iojsonwebtoken10trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.11trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-data-integrity0.7trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-crypto0.2trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-encoding0.1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-did-resolver-cache-sdk0.8trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_with3trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iojsonschema0.46trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregress0.11trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.11trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-tsp0.1trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io, npm.