Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 07:09 UTC

trustoverip / dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf

Trust Tasks - Transport Agnostic protocol for managing Tasks

Rust · Dart · TypeScriptCustom license★ 5 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#ssi

trustoverip/dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Trust over IPOrganization
126 followers119 public repossince Feb 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/trustoverip/dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf/trust-tasks-gov0.8.24-970 days ago—
crates.iotrust-tasks0.32.57901310 days agotransportverifiabledidtrust-taskstrustoveripdata-structuresnetwork-programming
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32.525,0382430 days agojson-schemaverifiabledidtrust-taskstrustoveripdata-structuresencoding
crates.iotrust-tasks-tsp0.32.56,8911440 days agotspaffiniditrust-tasksvidcryptographynetwork-programming
npm@openvtc/trust-tasks0.26.2422,0382290 days ago—
crates.iotrust-tasks-https0.32.511,5691500 days agotransporthttpsreqwestaxumtrust-tasksnetwork-programming
crates.iotrust-tasks-proof0.32.516,0181470 days agoproofdiddata-integritytrust-tasksauthenticationcryptography

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

82Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18/36Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 793 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year793
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year26

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagtrust-tasks-v0.32.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

20At Risk
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
7.5/25Forks — 9 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars5
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

64Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

82Excellent
How it's scored
65.5/80Monthly downloads — 82,344 downloads/month across crates, go, npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/trustoverip/dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf/trust-tasks-go, trust-tasks, trust-tasks-rs, trust-tasks-tsp, @openvtc/trust-tasks, trust-tasks-https, trust-tasks-proof
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, go, npm
total_downloads207,451
monthly_downloads82,344
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.99

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
40.1/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
29.5/30PR acceptance — 797/810 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs797
open_issues1
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d60
prs_decided_7d60
prs_merged_30d60
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.955
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

70Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.1/25Owner reach — 126 followers of trustoverip
25/25Track record — 119 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers126
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintrustoverip
public_repos119
account_age_days2,437

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 7 package(s) on crates, go, npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 243 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/trustoverip/dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf/trust-tasks-go, trust-tasks, trust-tasks-rs, trust-tasks-tsp, @openvtc/trust-tasks, trust-tasks-https, trust-tasks-proof
ecosystemscrates, go, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/trust-tasks
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsssi
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/trust-tasks
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes44,032

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — trust-tasks-ts-capability-client/tsconfig.json, trust-tasks-ts-proof/tsconfig.json, trust-tasks-ts-tsp/tsconfig.json, trust-tasks-ts/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstrust-tasks-ts-capability-client/tsconfig.json, trust-tasks-ts-proof/tsconfig.json, trust-tasks-ts-tsp/tsconfig.json, trust-tasks-ts/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-go/capabilityclient/go.mod, trust-tasks-go/didcomm/go.mod, trust-tasks-go/go.mod, trust-tasks-go/proof/go.mod, trust-tasks-go/tsp/go.mod, trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml, trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

96Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
50.7/55Manageable file sizes — 467/5,959 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes823,521
source_files_sampled5,959
oversized_source_files467

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

5GitHub stars
6contributors
793commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.io, Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'trust-tasks-codegen' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index crates:trust-tasks@0.32.5; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810922026-052026-072026-10
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 07:09 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 95
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmajv^8.17.1package.json
npmajv-formats^3.0.1package.json
npmjson-schema-to-typescript^15.0.4package.json
npmyaml^2.5.1package.json
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-capability-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json_canonicalizer0.3trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.iomultibase0.9trust-tasks-ceremony/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-saphyr1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iotypify0.6trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioschemars0.8trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprettyplease0.2trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.5trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2trust-tasks-codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-messaging-didcomm-v10.2trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-didcomm-v1/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-messaging-didcomm0.15.9trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-didcomm/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.8trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.5trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.13trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iojsonwebtoken10trust-tasks-https/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-data-integrity0.8trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-crypto0.2trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-encoding0.1trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-did-resolver-cache-sdk0.8trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-did-common0.4.2trust-tasks-proof/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_with3trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iojsonschema0.46trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregress0.11trust-tasks-rs/Cargo.toml
npm@openvtc/trust-tasks^0.19.0trust-tasks-ts-capability-client/package.json
npm@openvtc/trust-tasks^0.19.0trust-tasks-ts-proof/package.json
npm@noble/curves^2.0.0trust-tasks-ts-proof/package.json
npm@noble/hashes^2.0.0trust-tasks-ts-proof/package.json
npm@scure/base^2.0.0trust-tasks-ts-proof/package.json
npm@openvtc/trust-tasks^0.19.0trust-tasks-ts-tsp/package.json
npm@openvtc/vti-tsp-js^0.2.0trust-tasks-ts-tsp/package.json
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaffinidi-tsp0.2trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2trust-tasks-tsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-rs0.32trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-https0.32trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-didcomm0.32trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-didcomm-v10.32trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-tsp0.32trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-proof0.32trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-ceremony0.2trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
crates.iotrust-tasks-capability-client0.32trust-tasks/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with trustoverip/dtgwg-trust-tasks-tf. Read them side by side →

95actix/actix-netA collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.Exceptional93tkhq/qosQuorumOS is a computation layer for running applications inside Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs)Exceptional94celestiaorg/luminaWasm friendly Celestia light node implementation in RustExceptional98ZcashFoundation/zebraZcash - Financial Privacy in Rust 🦓Exceptional98microsoft/oxidizerOxidizer is a platform for Rust service development which bridges the gaps in the crate ecosystem to deliver a turn-key solution to enable the efficient creation of high-scale high-availability and high-performance services in Rust.Exceptional98zama-ai/tfhe-rsTFHE-rs: A Pure Rust implementation of the TFHE Scheme for Boolean and Integer Arithmetics Over Encrypted Data.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, crates.io, npm.