Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 22:36 UTC

ttttmr / pi-context

Letting AI Actively Manage Its Own Context

Python · TypeScript · JavaScriptNo license detected★ 291 stars⑂ 24 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗

ttttmr/pi-context holds a health index of 45 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (67/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (40/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

45
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

45
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

tmrPersonal account
328 followers93 public repossince Oct 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmpi-context2.2.02,487184 days agopi-agentpi-packagecontext-managementcontext-optimizationcontext-compacttime-travelcheckpointpi-skill

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18Commit volume — 50 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year50
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.9/60Stars — 291 stars
11.3/25Forks — 24 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks24
stars291
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,487 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespi-context
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,487
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.92
How it's scored
37.8/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
6.9/30PR acceptance — 3/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues1
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.9
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.1/25Owner reach — 328 followers of ttttmr
25/25Track record — 93 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers328
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginttttmr
public_repos93
account_age_days3,254
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 18 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespi-context
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://blog.xlab.app/p/51d26495/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://blog.xlab.app/p/51d26495/
docs_sitehttps://blog.xlab.app/p/51d26495/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages2
assessed_packages185
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 185 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 44 of 50 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.88
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,342
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 50
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes27,820
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

291GitHub stars
4contributors
50commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 24 ⇿
0Stars
24Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242442026-022026-052026-09
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10
3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 22:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 185

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk0.123.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/crc325.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/sha256-browser5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/sha256-js5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/supports-web-crypto5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-crypto/util5.2.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-bedrock-runtime3.1048.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.974.11indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.974.12indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.37indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.38indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.39indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.40indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.972.42indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.42indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.42indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.43indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.37indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.38indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.972.42indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.41indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.42indirect
npm@aws-sdk/eventstream-handler-node3.972.16indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-eventstream3.972.12indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-websocket3.972.19indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-websocket3.972.20indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.10indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.9indirect
npm@aws-sdk/signature-v4-multi-region3.996.27indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1048.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1049.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/types3.973.8indirect
npm@aws-sdk/util-locate-window3.965.5indirect
npm@aws-sdk/xml-builder3.972.24indirect
npm@aws/lambda-invoke-store0.2.4indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.7indirect
npm@earendil-works/chord0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-agent-core0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-ai0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-telemetry0.85.1indirect
npm@earendil-works/pi-tui0.85.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@google/genai1.52.0indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-arm640.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-universal0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-darwin-x640.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-arm64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-arm64-musl0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-riscv64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-x64-gnu0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-linux-x64-musl0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-win32-arm64-msvc0.3.9indirect
npm@mariozechner/clipboard-win32-x64-msvc0.3.9indirect
npm@nodable/entities2.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/aspromise1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/base641.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/codegen2.0.5indirect
npm@protobufjs/eventemitter1.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/eventemitter1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/fetch1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/float1.0.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/inquire1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/path1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/pool1.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/utf81.1.1indirect
npm@silvia-odwyer/photon-node0.3.4indirect
npm@smithy/core3.24.3indirect
npm@smithy/credential-provider-imds4.3.3indirect
npm@smithy/fetch-http-handler5.4.3indirect
npm@smithy/is-array-buffer2.2.0indirect
npm@smithy/node-http-handler4.7.3indirect
npm@smithy/signature-v45.4.3indirect
npm@smithy/types4.14.2indirect
npm@smithy/util-buffer-from2.2.0indirect
npm@smithy/util-utf82.3.0indirect
npm@stablelib/base641.0.1indirect
npm@types/node22.19.19indirect
npm@types/node25.9.1indirect
npm@types/retry0.12.0indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbignumber.js9.3.1indirect
npmbowser2.14.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbuffer-equal-constant-time1.0.1indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer4.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdiff8.0.4indirect
npmecdsa-sig-formatter1.0.11indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmfast-sha2561.3.0indirect
npmfast-xml-builder1.2.0indirect
npmfast-xml-parser5.7.3indirect
npmfetch-blob3.2.0indirect
npmformdata-polyfill4.0.10indirect
npmgaxios7.1.4indirect
npmgcp-metadata8.1.2indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmgoogle-auth-library10.6.2indirect
npmgoogle-logging-utils1.1.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmgrok-mermaid0.2.2indirect
npmhighlight.js10.7.3indirect
npmhosted-git-info9.0.3indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmjson-bigint1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-to-ts3.1.1indirect
npmjwa2.0.1indirect
npmjws4.0.1indirect
npmlong5.3.2indirect
npmlru-cache11.4.0indirect
npmmarked18.0.5indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-domexception1.0.0indirect
npmnode-fetch3.3.2indirect
npmopenai6.40.0indirect
npmp-retry4.6.2indirect
npmpartial-json0.1.7indirect
npmpath-expression-matcher1.5.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmproper-lockfile4.1.2indirect
npmprotobufjs7.6.0indirect
npmprotobufjs7.6.5indirect
npmretry0.12.0indirect
npmretry0.13.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmstandardwebhooks1.1.1indirect
npmstrnum2.3.0indirect
npmts-algebra2.0.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypebox1.3.7indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici8.9.0indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmweb-streams-polyfill3.3.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmws8.20.1indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmxml-naming0.1.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 185 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
protobufjs7.6.0indirecthigh38.6.6
ws8.20.1indirecthigh18.21.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.