Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 07:08 UTC

tursodatabase / turso-cli

Command line interface to the Turso Cloud.

GoMIT★ 317 stars⑂ 51 forkssince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindTerminal interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

tursodatabase/turso-cli holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Turso DatabaseOrganization

1,758 followers60 public repossince Jul 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/tursodatabase/turso-cli	v1.0.30	-	206	5 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 5 days ago
16.6/36	Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 114 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	114
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	5
active_weeks_last_year	24

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 53 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	53
latest_release_tag	v1.0.30
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	5
mean_days_between_releases	10.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

59Moderate

How it's scored

40.5/60	Stars — 317 stars
14.2/25	Forks — 51 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	51
stars	317
watchers	7
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

63Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 38 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	38
top_contributor_share	0.361

Issue & PR responsiveness

84Excellent

How it's scored

30.2/42	Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
27.9/30	PR acceptance — 615/661 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	615
open_issues	103
closed_issues	264
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.719
closed_unmerged_prs	46
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
23.3/25	Owner reach — 1,758 followers of tursodatabase
19/25	Track record — 60 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	1,758
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	tursodatabase
public_repos	60
account_age_days	1,104

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20	Version history — 206 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/tursodatabase/turso-cli
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://turso.tech
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	database, serverless, edge
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://turso.tech
docs_site	https://turso.tech
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 22 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/sys v0.40.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	36
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	66
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, moderate 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 66 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/136 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	38,604
source_files_sampled	136
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

317GitHub stars

38contributors

114commits, last 12 months

5days since last push

53releases

2bus factor

103open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 317 ★ / 0 ⇿

317Stars

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10

5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 07:07 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9	CI-Tests	12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	22 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 24

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/Clever/csvlint	`v0.3.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/athoscouto/codename	`v0.0.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles	`v0.21.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea	`v1.3.10`	go.mod
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.18.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gdamore/tcell	`v1.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-version	`v1.8.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/kirsle/configdir	`v0.0.0-20170128060238-e45d2f54772f`	go.mod
Go	github.com/libsql/libsql-shell-go	`v0.10.7`	go.mod
Go	github.com/manifoldco/promptui	`v0.9.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter	`v0.0.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pkg/browser	`v0.0.0-20210911075715-681adbf594b8`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.21.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20240716160929-1d5bc16f04a8`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.19.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rodaine/table	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.40.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.39.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 66

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 42 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/athoscouto/codename	`v0.0.3`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles	`v0.21.0`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea	`v1.3.10`	direct
Go	github.com/clever/csvlint	`v0.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.18.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gdamore/tcell	`v1.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-version	`v1.8.0`	direct
Go	github.com/kirsle/configdir	`v0.0.0-20170128060238-e45d2f54772f`	direct
Go	github.com/libsql/libsql-shell-go	`v0.10.7`	direct
Go	github.com/manifoldco/promptui	`v0.9.0`	direct
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	direct
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	direct
Go	github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter	`v0.0.5`	direct
Go	github.com/pkg/browser	`v0.0.0-20210911075715-681adbf594b8`	direct
Go	github.com/rodaine/table	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.21.0`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20240716160929-1d5bc16f04a8`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.19.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.40.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.39.0`	direct
Go	github.com/antlr4-go/antlr/v4	`v4.13.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/atotto/clipboard	`v0.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2	`v2.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.2.3-0.20250311203215-f60798e515dc`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.10.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbuf	`v0.0.13-0.20250311204145-2c3ea96c31dd`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/term	`v0.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/chzyer/readline	`v1.5.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/coder/websocket	`v1.8.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/erikgeiser/coninput	`v0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0f`	indirect
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.9.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gdamore/encoding	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/validator/v10	`v10.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2	`v2.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-localereader	`v0.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.16`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3	`v1.14.16`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/ansi	`v0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/cancelreader	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/termenv	`v0.16.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.2.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero	`v0.11.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sourcegraph/conc	`v0.3.1-0.20240121214520-5f936abd7ae8`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/afero	`v1.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	indirect
Go	github.com/subosito/gotenv	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/tursodatabase/libsql-client-go	`v0.0.0-20260514053736-a9a8fadfe885`	indirect
Go	github.com/xo/terminfo	`v0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41e`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.4`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.46.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.48.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.33.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/check.v1	`v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6c`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 66 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.46.0`	indirect	critical	27	`0.52.0`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.48.0`	indirect	moderate	8	`1.26.3`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.40.0`	direct	unknown	1	`0.44.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records