Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-01 18:20 UTC

tyohnn / holiday-cfo

1인용 복식부기 원장 — 가계부, 부채, 자산, 현금흐름. Claude Code 플러그인.

TypeScript · MDX · JavaScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

tyohnn/holiday-cfo holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (27/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

tony yohnPersonal account
13 followers13 public repossince Jan 2018@ssota-labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@holiday-cfo/uipoints to another repo — not scored0.4.42,461159 days ago
npm@holiday-cfo/clipoints to another repo — not scored0.4.42,429159 days ago
npm@holiday-cfo/corepoints to another repo — not scored0.4.43,375159 days ago
npm@holiday-cfo/blockspoints to another repo — not scored0.4.42,231159 days ago
npm@holiday-cfo/adapterspoints to another repo — not scored0.4.41,705109 days ago
npm@holiday-cfo/store-d1points to another repo — not scored0.4.41,491109 days ago
npm@holiday-cfo/contractspoints to another repo — not scored0.4.42,290109 days ago
npm@holiday-cfo/store-sqlpoints to another repo — not scored0.4.42,765159 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 130 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year130
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 14 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv0.4.4
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases0.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

27At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

41Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.944
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
26.8/30PR acceptance — 50/56 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs50
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of tyohnn
20.3/25Track record — 13 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logintyohnn
public_repos13
account_age_days3,114
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 16 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages93
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@holiday-cfo/ui@0.4.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 93 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/assets/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/assets/CLAUDE.md, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/cli/templates/chatgpt-sites/AGENTS.md, packages/cli/templates/dash/AGENTS.md, packages/cli/templates/ledger/AGENTS.md, packages/cli/templates/ledger/CLAUDE.md, packages/cli/templates/vercel-supabase/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 94 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.agents/skills/oh-my-doc/assets/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/assets/CLAUDE.md, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/cli/templates/chatgpt-sites/AGENTS.md, packages/cli/templates/dash/AGENTS.md, packages/cli/templates/ledger/AGENTS.md, packages/cli/templates/ledger/CLAUDE.md, packages/cli/templates/vercel-supabase/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes22,088
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/docs/tsconfig.json, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/packages/docs-ui/tsconfig.json, apps/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/tsconfig.json, packages/blocks/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/templates/chatgpt-sites/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/templates/dash/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/templates/vercel-supabase/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/contracts/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/store-d1/tsconfig.json, packages/store-postgres/tsconfig.json, packages/store-sql/tsconfig.json, packages/store-sqlite/tsconfig.json, packages/store-testkit/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 86 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs.agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/docs/tsconfig.json, .agents/skills/oh-my-doc/templates/default/packages/docs-ui/tsconfig.json, apps/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/tsconfig.json, packages/blocks/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/templates/chatgpt-sites/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/templates/dash/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/templates/vercel-supabase/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/contracts/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/store-d1/tsconfig.json, packages/store-postgres/tsconfig.json, packages/store-sql/tsconfig.json, packages/store-sqlite/tsconfig.json, packages/store-testkit/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.86
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 2/329 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes150,216
source_files_sampled329
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
130commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/ui' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/cli' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/core' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/blocks' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/adapters' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/store-d1' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/contracts' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@holiday-cfo/store-sql' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ssota-labs/holiday-cfo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-01 18:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities16 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 40
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@holiday-cfo/contractsworkspace:*packages/adapters/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/coreworkspace:*packages/adapters/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/uiworkspace:*packages/blocks/package.json
npmzod^4.4.3packages/blocks/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/adaptersworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/contractsworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/coreworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/store-sqliteworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npmcommander^13.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmzod^3.24.1packages/cli/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/store-sqlworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npmzod^3.24.1packages/contracts/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/contractsworkspace:*packages/core/package.json
npmzod^3.24.1packages/core/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/coreworkspace:*packages/store-d1/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/coreworkspace:*packages/store-postgres/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/store-sqlworkspace:*packages/store-postgres/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/coreworkspace:*packages/store-sql/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/coreworkspace:*packages/store-sqlite/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/store-sqlworkspace:*packages/store-sqlite/package.json
npm@holiday-cfo/coreworkspace:*packages/store-testkit/package.json
npm@base-ui/react^1.6.0packages/ui/package.json
npm@shadcn/react^0.2.1packages/ui/package.json
npm@tabler/icons-react^3.45.0packages/ui/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1packages/ui/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1packages/ui/package.json
npmcmdk^1.1.1packages/ui/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.4.0packages/ui/package.json
npmembla-carousel-react^8.6.0packages/ui/package.json
npminput-otp^1.4.2packages/ui/package.json
npmnext-themes^0.4.6packages/ui/package.json
npmreact19.2.4packages/ui/package.json
npmreact-day-picker^10.0.1packages/ui/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.4packages/ui/package.json
npmreact-resizable-panels^4.12.2packages/ui/package.json
npmrecharts3.8.0packages/ui/package.json
npmsonner^2.0.7packages/ui/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0packages/ui/package.json
npmtw-animate-css^1.4.0packages/ui/package.json
npmzod^4.4.3packages/ui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@holiday-cfo/ui@0.4.4 pulls in 93 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.