Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-04 11:13 UTC

udondan / iam-floyd

AWS IAM policy statement generator with fluent interface

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 571 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Jun 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

udondan/iam-floyd holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Daniel SchroederPersonal account
92 followers121 public repossince Jan 2014@dbsystel

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmiam-floyd0.848.012,4057330 days agoawsiampolicyiam-floyd
npmcdk-iam-floyd0.848.093,6057020 days agoawsiampolicyiam-floydcdkaws-cdk
npmtooter0.1.12021426 days agomastodontooterbot
PyPIiam-floyd0.848.03165090 days agoawsiamiam-floydpolicy

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,040 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,040
human_commit_share0.77
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.848.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.7/60Stars — 571 stars
10.7/25Forks — 20 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks20
stars571
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges13
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesapi.codeclimate.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
67/80Monthly downloads — 106,326 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesiam-floyd, cdk-iam-floyd, iam-floyd
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads106,326
unverified_packages_excludedtooter
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.96
How it's scored
33.8/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance — 2,105/2,239 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2,105
open_issues11
closed_issues45
prs_merged_7d30
prs_decided_7d30
prs_merged_30d37
prs_decided_30d37
issue_closed_ratio0.804
closed_unmerged_prs134
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.2/25Owner reach — 92 followers of udondan
25/25Track record — 121 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers92
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginudondan
public_repos121
account_age_days4,640
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 733 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesiam-floyd, cdk-iam-floyd, tooter, iam-floyd
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs, ruff.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://iam-floyd.readthedocs.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaws, iam, iam-policy, generator, cdk, aws-cdk, jsii, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://iam-floyd.readthedocs.io/
docs_sitehttps://iam-floyd.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
4.5/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories44
affected_packages6
assessed_packages226
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severityhigh 5, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 226 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

95Exceptional · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
36.7/40Legible commit history — 53 of 77 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.688
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes19,497
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile, test/Makefile, tooter/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs, ruff.toml
11/11Static type checking — python/iam_floyd/py.typed, test/tsconfig.json, tooter/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 23 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile, test/Makefile, tooter/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/iam_floyd/py.typed, test/tsconfig.json, tooter/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestslint/go.mod, lint/pom.xml, test/jsii/dotnet/Scenarios.csproj, test/jsii/examples/dotnet/Examples.csproj, test/jsii/examples/java/pom.xml, test/jsii/java/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.23
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 2/273 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes64,537
source_files_sampled273
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

571GitHub stars
4contributors
1,040commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
11open issues
Go, Maven, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/udondan/iam-floyd/lint' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index npm:iam-floyd@0.848.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 20 ⇿
0Stars
20Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216202022020-062023-012025-08

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-04 11:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle14.3.0lint/pom.xml
npm@aws-sdk/client-secrets-manager3.1142.0tooter/package.json
npm@aws-sdk/client-sqs3.1142.0tooter/package.json
npm@types/node24.19.0tooter/package.json
npmaws-cdk-lib2.271.0tooter/package.json
npmconstructs10.6.0tooter/package.json
npmesbuild0.28.2tooter/package.json
npmmegalodon10.3.0tooter/package.json
npmts-node10.9.2tooter/package.json
npmtypescript5.9.3tooter/package.json
All dependencies 228

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 214 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle14.3.0direct
npm@aws-sdk/client-secrets-manager3.1142.0direct
npm@aws-sdk/client-sqs3.1142.0direct
npm@aws-sdk/client-sqs3.1146.0direct
npm@types/node20.19.43direct
npm@types/node24.19.0direct
npmaws-cdk-lib2.271.0direct
npmaws-cdk-lib2.272.0direct
npmconstructs10.6.0direct
npmconstructs10.8.1direct
npmesbuild0.28.2direct
npmmegalodon10.3.0direct
npmts-node10.9.2direct
npmtypescript5.9.3direct
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/renameio/v2v2.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.21indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-shellwordsv1.0.12indirect
Gogithub.com/rhysd/actionlintv1.7.12indirect
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.15.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v4v4.0.0-rc.3indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0indirect
Gomvdan.cc/editorconfigv0.3.0indirect
Gomvdan.cc/sh/v3v3.14.1indirect
Mavencom.example:floyd-consumer1.0.0indirect
Mavencom.udondan:cdk-iam-floyd—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin3.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin3.5.0indirect
npm@aws-cdk/asset-awscli-v12.2.292indirect
npm@aws-cdk/asset-node-proxy-agent-v62.1.3indirect
npm@aws-cdk/cloud-assembly-api2.2.6indirect
npm@aws-cdk/cloud-assembly-schema54.26.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-iam3.1146.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/client-s33.1146.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.978.1indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.72indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.74indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.973.17indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.79indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.84indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.72indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.973.16indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.78indirect
npm@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-sqs3.972.43indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.46indirect
npm@aws-sdk/signature-v4-multi-region3.996.47indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1138.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/types3.974.6indirect
npm@aws-sdk/xml-builder3.972.41indirect
npm@aws/cloudformation-validate1.12.1indirect
npm@aws/lambda-invoke-store0.3.0indirect
npm@badgateway/oauth2-client2.4.2indirect
npm@balena/dockerignore1.0.2indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.15indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@jsii/spec1.141.0indirect
npm@smithy/core3.35.0indirect
npm@smithy/credential-provider-imds4.5.2indirect
npm@smithy/fetch-http-handler5.8.0indirect
npm@smithy/node-http-handler4.12.1indirect
npm@smithy/signature-v45.7.4indirect
npm@smithy/types4.19.0indirect
npm@swc/core1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core1.16.13indirect
npm@swc/core-darwin-arm641.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-darwin-x641.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-linux-arm64-gnu1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-linux-arm64-musl1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-linux-ppc64-gnu1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-linux-s390x-gnu1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-linux-x64-gnu1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-linux-x64-musl1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-win32-arm64-msvc1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-win32-ia32-msvc1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/core-win32-x64-msvc1.15.30indirect
npm@swc/counter0.1.3indirect
npm@swc/helpers0.5.21indirect
npm@swc/helpers0.5.23indirect
npm@swc/types0.1.26indirect
npm@tsconfig/node101.0.9indirect
npm@tsconfig/node121.0.11indirect
npm@tsconfig/node141.0.3indirect
npm@tsconfig/node161.0.4indirect
npm@types/aws-lambda8.10.164indirect
npm@types/ws8.18.1indirect
npmacorn8.11.3indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.2indirect
npmarg4.1.3indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmaws-cdk2.1144.0indirect
npmaxios1.15.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbowser2.14.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcase1.6.3indirect
npmcdk-iam-floyd0.0.0indirect
npmcheerio1.2.0indirect
npmcolors1.4.0indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcreate-require1.1.1indirect
npmdayjs1.11.13indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdiff4.0.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmeslint10.11.0indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier10.1.8indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier5.5.6indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.16.0indirect
npmform-data4.0.5indirect
npmfs-extra11.3.6indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglobals17.13.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmisomorphic-ws5.0.0indirect
npmjsii5.9.54indirect
npmjsii-docgen10.12.6indirect
npmjsii-pacmak1.141.0indirect
npmjsonfile6.2.1indirect
npmjsonschema1.5.0indirect
npmmake-error1.3.6indirect
npmmarkdownlint-cli20.23.3indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmobject-assign-deep0.4.0indirect
npmprettier3.9.9indirect
npmproxy-from-env2.1.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmregenerator-runtime0.14.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmts-morph28.0.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.71.0indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.1indirect
npmuuid11.1.0indirect
npmv8-compile-cache-lib3.0.1indirect
npmws8.19.0indirect
npmyaml1.10.3indirect
npmyn3.1.1indirect
NuGetCDK.IAM.Floyd—indirect
NuGetFloyd.Consumer1.0.0indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIdoc82.0.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIhatchling1.32.4indirect
PyPIidna3.20indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.1indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIruff0.16.10indirect
PyPIshellcheck-py0.11.0.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-watch0.1.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIyamllint1.38.0indirect
PyPIzizmor1.30.1indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 226 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
axios1.15.0indirecthigh361.20.0
brace-expansion5.0.9indirecthigh35.0.12
form-data4.0.5indirecthigh14.0.6
uuid11.1.0indirecthigh113.0.1
ws8.19.0indirecthigh28.21.0
diff4.0.2indirectmoderate18.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.