Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 00:09 UTC

uiwjs / react-md-editor

A simple markdown editor with preview, implemented with React.js and TypeScript.

TypeScriptMIT★ 2,927 stars⑂ 201 forkssince Aug 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

uiwjs/react-md-editor holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (75/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (61/100). It was last updated 29 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

uiwOrganization
390 followers77 public repossince Oct 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@uiw/react-md-editor4.1.22,858,68021629 days agoreacteditormd-editormarkdownreact-markdownreact-md-editorreact-markdown-editormarkdown-editormduiwuiwjscode

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 29 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
13.3/18Commit volume — 29 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year29
human_commit_share0.8
days_since_last_push29
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 29 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~67.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release29
mean_days_between_releases67.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
56.2/60Stars — 2,927 stars
19.2/25Forks — 201 forks
6/15Watchers — 13 watchers
Inputs used
forks201
stars2,927
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 2,858,680 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@uiw/react-md-editor
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,858,680
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 30 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.897
How it's scored
23.8/42Issue resolution — 57% of issues closed
15.3/30PR acceptance — 149/293 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs149
open_issues175
closed_issues228
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.566
closed_unmerged_prs144
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.6/25Owner reach — 390 followers of uiwjs
25/25Track record — 77 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers390
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginuiwjs
public_repos77
account_age_days3,251

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history — 216 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@uiw/react-md-editor
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — www/package.json ("eslintConfig")
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://uiwjs.github.io/react-md-editor
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmarkdown, markdown-editor, react, editor, typescript, javascript, textarea-editor, textarea, reactjs, react-markdown-editor
has_wikino
homepagehttps://uiwjs.github.io/react-md-editor
docs_sitehttps://uiwjs.github.io/react-md-editor
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages142
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@uiw/react-md-editor@4.1.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 142 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 75 of 80 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.938
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — www/package.json ("eslintConfig")
11/11Static type checking — core/tsconfig.json, example/nextjs/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, www/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configscore/tsconfig.json, example/nextjs/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, www/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/69 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes19,445
source_files_sampled69
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,927GitHub stars
30contributors
29commits, last 12 months
29days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
175open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 201 ⇿
0Stars
201Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020020052019-082023-032026-09
Major 1Minor 20Patch 79

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 00:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@babel/runtime^7.14.6core/package.json
npm@uiw/react-markdown-preview^5.2.0core/package.json
npmrehype~13.0.0core/package.json
npmrehype-prism-plus~2.0.0core/package.json
npm@uiw/react-markdown-preview-example^2.0.0www/package.json
npm@uiw/react-md-editor4.1.2www/package.json
npmdom-to-image^2.6.0www/package.json
npmkatex~0.16.0www/package.json
npmmermaid~10.9.1www/package.json
npmreact~18.2.0www/package.json
npmreact-dom~18.2.0www/package.json
npmrehype-sanitize~6.0.0www/package.json
All dependencies 43

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 29 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/runtime^7.14.6direct
npm@uiw/react-markdown-preview^5.2.0direct
npm@uiw/react-markdown-preview-example^2.0.0direct
npm@uiw/react-md-editor4.1.2direct
npmdom-to-image^2.6.0direct
npmkatex~0.16.0direct
npmmermaid~10.9.1direct
npmreact^18.0.0direct
npmreact~18.2.0direct
npmreact-dom^18.0.0direct
npmreact-dom~18.2.0direct
npmrehype~13.0.0direct
npmrehype-prism-plus~2.0.0direct
npmrehype-sanitize~6.0.0direct
npm@kkt/less-modules^7.4.9indirect
npm@kkt/ncc^1.0.14indirect
npm@kkt/raw-modules^7.4.9indirect
npm@kkt/scope-plugin-options^7.4.9indirect
npm@tailwindcss/postcss^4indirect
npm@types/katex^0.16.0indirect
npm@types/node^20indirect
npm@types/react^18indirect
npm@types/react~18.2.0indirect
npm@types/react-dom^18indirect
npm@types/react-dom~18.2.0indirect
npm@types/react-test-renderer~18.0.0indirect
npmcompile-less-cli~1.9.0indirect
npmhusky~8.0.0indirect
npmjest^29.5.0indirect
npmjest-environment-jsdom^29.5.0indirect
npmjest-environment-node^29.5.0indirect
npmjest-watch-typeahead^2.2.2indirect
npmkkt^7.4.9indirect
npmlerna8.0.0indirect
npmlint-staged^15.1.0indirect
npmmarkdown-react-code-preview-loader^2.1.4indirect
npmnext15.3.1indirect
npmprettier^3.0.0indirect
npmreact-test-renderer~18.2.0indirect
npmsource-map-explorer~2.5.3indirect
npmtailwindcss^4indirect
npmtsbb^4.5.1indirect
npmtypescript^5indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@uiw/react-md-editor@4.1.2 pulls in 142 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.