Public record
Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 06:07 UTC

ujued / dashboard

General-purpose web UI for Kubernetes clusters

Go · TypeScript · HTMLApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2020forkView on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

ujued/dashboard holds a health index of 25 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (51/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 2280 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

25
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

25
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 31 is calibrated to 25 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

好先生Personal account
3 followers25 public repossince Feb 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/kubernetes/dashboardpoints to another repo — not scoredv1.10.1-302768 days ago
npmkubernetes-dashboardpoints to another repo — not scored0.0.1-security1211499 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 2,280 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2,280
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

48Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 45 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,281 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tagv2.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,281
mean_days_between_releases15.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

75Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 32% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 37 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.323

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

46Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of ujued
22.3/25Track record — 25 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginujued
public_repos25
account_age_days3,447
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

58Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

35Weak
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

19Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

19Critical
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 37 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 334 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

70Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/675 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes83,333
source_files_sampled675
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
100contributors
0commits, last 12 months
2,280days since last push
45releases
3bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/kubernetes/dashboard' points at a different repository (https://github.com/kubernetes/dashboard); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'kubernetes-dashboard' points at a different repository (npm/security-holder); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.9 / 10
1.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 06:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 37 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities334 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 57
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/docker/distributionv2.7.1+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restfulv2.12.0+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/glogv0.0.0-20160126235308-23def4e6c14bgo.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.0.0-20200324143707-d3edc9973b7ego.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.3.2go.mod
Gogopkg.in/igm/sockjs-go.v2v2.1.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/square/go-jose.v2v2.4.1go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.2.8go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.18.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserverv0.18.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.18.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.18.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/heapsterv1.5.4go.mod
npm@angular/animations9.0.2package.json
npm@angular/cdk9.1.1package.json
npm@angular/common9.0.2package.json
npm@angular/compiler9.0.2package.json
npm@angular/core9.0.2package.json
npm@angular/flex-layout9.0.0-beta.29package.json
npm@angular/forms9.0.2package.json
npm@angular/http8.0.0-beta.10package.json
npm@angular/localize9.0.6package.json
npm@angular/material9.1.1package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser9.0.2package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser-dynamic9.0.2package.json
npm@angular/router9.0.2package.json
npm@swimlane/ngx-charts13.0.2package.json
npm@types/c30.7.1package.json
npm@types/d35.7.2package.json
npm@types/d3-scale2.2.0package.json
npm@types/file-saver2.0.1package.json
npm@types/highlight.js9.12.3package.json
npmace-builds1.4.8package.json
npmansi-to-html0.6.14package.json
npmc30.7.15package.json
npmcore-js3.6.4package.json
npmd35.15.0package.json
npmfile-saver2.0.2package.json
npmhighlight.js9.18.1package.json
npmjs-yaml3.13.1package.json
npmmaterial-design-icons3.0.1package.json
npmngx-cookie-service2.4.0package.json
npmngx-filter-pipe2.1.2package.json
npmnormalize.css8.0.1package.json
npmroboto-fontface0.10.0package.json
npmrxjs6.5.4package.json
npmrxjs-compat6.5.4package.json
npmsockjs-client1.4.0package.json
npmsystemjs6.2.6package.json
npmtruncate-url1.0.0package.json
npmtslib1.11.1package.json
npmweb-animations-js2.3.2package.json
npmxterm4.5.0package.json
npmxterm-addon-fit0.3.0package.json
npmzone.js0.10.2package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ujued/dashboard. Read them side by side →

100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100mattermost/mattermostMattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle..Exceptional100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional99nhost/nhostThe Open Source Firebase Alternative with GraphQL.Exceptional99authelia/autheliaThe Single Sign-On Multi-Factor portal for web apps, now OpenID Certified™Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm.