Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-11 11:21 UTC

umbraco / Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob

Umbraco Cloud Storage Provider for Azure Blob Storage

C#MIT★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

umbraco/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (25/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Umbraco HQOrganization
421 followers122 public repossince Feb 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetUmbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core18.0.0-1547 days agoumbracocloudstorageazureblob
NuGetUmbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp18.0.0-1547 days agoumbracocloudstorageazureblobimagesharp
NuGetUmbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob18.0.0-2547 days agoumbracocloudstorageazureblob

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume — 32 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 47 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 47 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~23.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count47
latest_release_tagrelease-18.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release47
mean_days_between_releases23.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars5
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

65Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

81Excellent
How it's scored
64.8/80Total downloads — 1,706,897 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesUmbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core, Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp, Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,706,897
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.912

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
26.7/30PR acceptance — 8/9 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs8
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

92Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
18.9/25Owner reach — 421 followers of umbraco
25/25Track record — 122 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers421
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginumbraco
public_repos122
account_age_days5,297
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 47 days ago
20/20Version history — 25 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesUmbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core, Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp, Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish47

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

25At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

8Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0.5/40Legible commit history — 1 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.01
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

26At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core.csproj, src/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp.csproj, src/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core.csproj, src/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp.csproj, src/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes1,995
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

5GitHub stars
4contributors
32commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
47releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-11 11:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetUmbraco.StorageProviders.AzureBlob—src/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.Core.csproj
NuGetUmbraco.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp—src/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp.csproj
All dependencies 2

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetUmbraco.StorageProviders.AzureBlob—direct
NuGetUmbraco.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp—direct
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with umbraco/Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob. Read them side by side →

92FoundatioFx/FoundatioPluggable foundation blocks for building distributed apps.Excellent94Azure/AzuriteA lightweight server clone of Azure Storage that simulates most of the commands supported by it with minimal dependenciesExceptional87petrsvihlik/WopiHostThe most advanced .NET implementation of the WOPI protocol. Enables integration with WOPI clients such as Office Online Server.Excellent99prowler-cloud/prowlerProwler is the world’s most widely used open-source cloud security platform that automates security and compliance across any cloud environment.Exceptional98cloud-custodian/cloud-custodianRules engine for cloud security, cost optimization, and governance, DSL in yaml for policies to query, filter, and take actions on resourcesExceptional98pulumi/pulumiPulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.