Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 08:51 UTC

umodoc / editor

Umo Editor is an open-source document editor based on Vue3 and Tiptap3, providing an online editing experience similar to Microsoft Word.

Vue · JavaScriptMIT★ 1,594 stars⑂ 280 forkssince May 2024View on GitHub ↗

umodoc/editor holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (21/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Umo TeamPersonal account
56 followers5 public repossince Jun 2012Umodoc

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume497 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year497
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year43
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases5 version tags (no GitHub releases)
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 281 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~57.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv9.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release281
mean_days_between_releases57.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.9/60Stars1,594 stars
20.4/25Forks280 forks
6.8/15Watchers18 watchers
Inputs used
forks280
stars1,594
watchers18
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52.3/80Monthly downloads8,434 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@umoteam/editor
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads8,434
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 93% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.932
How it's scored
41.9/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
24.2/30PR acceptance63/78 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs63
open_issues1
closed_issues344
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.997
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.6/25Owner reach56 followers of umodoc
17.7/25Track record5 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginumodoc
public_repos5
account_age_days5,195
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history72 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@umoteam/editor
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.umodoc.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicseditor, richtext-editor, office-edtior, docs-editor, document-editor, online-office, vue3-editor, word-editor, web-edtior, wysiwyg-editor, umo-editor, tiptap
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.umodoc.com
docs_sitehttps://www.umodoc.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: @tiptap/core 3.20.0 (high 7.5)
8.7/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: uuid 10.0.0 (high 7.5), echarts 5.6.0 (moderate 6.1)
29.9/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 143 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages3
assessed_packages280
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the npm:@umoteam/editor@11.1.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 280 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

21At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
3.2/40Legible commit history6 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.06
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingjsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsjsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeVue with type-check config (jsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/96 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageVue
largest_source_bytes19,603
source_files_sampled96
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,594GitHub stars
13contributors
497commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
5releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 280 ⇿
0Stars
280Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030027652024-062025-072026-09
Major 4Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 08:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 53
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.2package.json
npm@floating-ui/dom1.7.5package.json
npm@tiptap/core3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-bold3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-code-block3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-code-block-lowlight3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-collaboration3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-details3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-document3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-drag-handle3.16.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-drag-handle-vue-33.16.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-horizontal-rule3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-image3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-invisible-characters3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-link3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-list3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-mathematics3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-mention3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-node-range3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-subscript3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-superscript3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-table3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-table-of-contents3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-text-align3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-text-style3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-typography3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-unique-id3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/extensions3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/pm3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/starter-kit3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/suggestion3.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/vue-33.20.0package.json
npm@tiptap/y-tiptap3.0.2package.json
npm@tool-belt/type-predicates1.4.1package.json
npm@umoteam/editor-external10.1.0package.json
npm@vueuse/core14.2.1package.json
npmcropperjs^2.1.1package.json
npmdom-to-image-more3.7.2package.json
npmes-drager1.2.11package.json
npmfast-glob3.3.3package.json
npmfile-saver2.0.5package.json
npmhotkeys-js4.0.2package.json
npmjsbarcode3.12.3package.json
npmkatex0.16.33package.json
npmlowlight3.3.0package.json
npmnzh1.0.14package.json
npmpretty-bytes7.1.0package.json
npmpure-svg-code1.0.6package.json
npmsmooth-signature1.0.15package.json
npmvue-i18n11.2.8package.json
npmy-prosemirror1.2.15package.json
npmy-protocols1.0.6package.json
npmyjs13.6.29package.json
All dependencies 73

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 53 direct and 20 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.2direct
npm@floating-ui/dom1.7.5direct
npm@tiptap/core3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-bold3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-code-block3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-code-block-lowlight3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-collaboration3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-details3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-document3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-drag-handle3.16.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-drag-handle-vue-33.16.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-horizontal-rule3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-image3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-invisible-characters3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-link3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-list3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-mathematics3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-mention3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-node-range3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-subscript3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-superscript3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-table3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-table-of-contents3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-text-align3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-text-style3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-typography3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extension-unique-id3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/extensions3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/pm3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/starter-kit3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/suggestion3.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/vue-33.20.0direct
npm@tiptap/y-tiptap3.0.2direct
npm@tool-belt/type-predicates1.4.1direct
npm@umoteam/editor-external10.1.0direct
npm@vueuse/core14.2.1direct
npmcropperjs^2.1.1direct
npmdom-to-image-more3.7.2direct
npmes-drager1.2.11direct
npmfast-glob3.3.3direct
npmfile-saver2.0.5direct
npmhotkeys-js4.0.2direct
npmjsbarcode3.12.3direct
npmkatex0.16.33direct
npmlowlight3.3.0direct
npmnzh1.0.14direct
npmpretty-bytes7.1.0direct
npmpure-svg-code1.0.6direct
npmsmooth-signature1.0.15direct
npmvue-i18n11.2.8direct
npmy-prosemirror1.2.15direct
npmy-protocols1.0.6direct
npmyjs13.6.29direct
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue^6.0.4indirect
npm@vue-macros/reactivity-transform^3.1.2indirect
npmesbuild^0.28.1indirect
npmhusky^9.1.7indirect
npmless^4.5.1indirect
npmless-loader^12.3.1indirect
npmlint-staged^16.2.7indirect
npmoxfmt^0.35.0indirect
npmoxlint^1.50.0indirect
npmpostcss^8.5.6indirect
npmpostcss-html^1.8.1indirect
npmtdesign-vue-next1.19.1indirect
npmunplugin-auto-import^21.0.0indirect
npmunplugin-vue^7.1.1indirect
npmunplugin-vue-components^31.0.0indirect
npmunplugin-vue-macros^2.14.5indirect
npmvite^7.3.1indirect
npmvite-bundle-visualizer^1.2.1indirect
npmvite-plugin-svg-icons^2.0.1indirect
npmvue^3.5.29indirect
Dependency advisories 3

Installing npm:@umoteam/editor@11.1.1 pulls in 280 packages, direct and transitive: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@tiptap/core3.20.0directhigh23.30.5
uuid10.0.0indirecthigh113.0.1
echarts5.6.0indirectmoderate16.1.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.