Public record
Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 14:43 UTC

unified-product-graph / tools

Unified Product Graph (public beta): SDK, CLI, MCP servers (local + cloud), adapters, markdown.

TypeScriptMIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMCP serverCommand-line toolhow this is determined

unified-product-graph/tools holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (36/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

3 followers3 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume132 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year132
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases98 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count98
latest_release_tagv0.24.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases1.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.8/80Monthly downloads30,477 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@unified-product-graph/cli, @unified-product-graph/sdk, @unified-product-graph/adapters, @unified-product-graph/markdown, @unified-product-graph/mcp-server, @unified-product-graph/cloud-server
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads30,477
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

36Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
4.3/25Owner reach3 followers of unified-product-graph
5/25Track record3 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginunified-product-graph
public_repos3
account_age_days117
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable6 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history108 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@unified-product-graph/cli, @unified-product-graph/sdk, @unified-product-graph/adapters, @unified-product-graph/markdown, @unified-product-graph/mcp-server, @unified-product-graph/cloud-server
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://unifiedproductgraph.org/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://unifiedproductgraph.org/
docs_sitehttps://unifiedproductgraph.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages33
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 33 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingpackages/adapters/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-server/tsconfig.json, packages/markdown/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-tooling/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/examples/helm/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/adapters/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-server/tsconfig.json, packages/markdown/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-tooling/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/examples/helm/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes8/474 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes117,764
source_files_sampled474
oversized_source_files8
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
132commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
98releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index npm:@unified-product-graph/cli@0.24.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 14:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 28
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@linear/sdk^5.0.0packages/adapters/package.json
npm@notionhq/client^2.3.0packages/adapters/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/core0.24.0packages/adapters/package.json
npm@linear/sdk^5.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npm@octokit/rest^20.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/core0.24.0packages/cli/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/sdk0.24.0packages/cli/package.json
npmchalk^4.1.2packages/cli/package.json
npmcommander^13.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npminquirer^12.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmora^8.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.27.0packages/cloud-server/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/core0.24.0packages/cloud-server/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/sdk0.24.0packages/cloud-server/package.json
npmnanoid^5.1.0packages/cloud-server/package.json
npmpg^8.13.0packages/cloud-server/package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.27.0packages/mcp-server/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/core0.24.0packages/mcp-server/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/sdk0.24.0packages/mcp-server/package.json
npmchokidar^4.0.0packages/mcp-server/package.json
npmnanoid^5.1.0packages/mcp-server/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/core*packages/mcp-tooling/package.json
npmtypescript^5.6.0packages/mcp-tooling/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/core0.24.0packages/sdk/package.json
npm@unified-product-graph/templates0.24.0packages/sdk/package.json
npmchokidar^4.0.0packages/sdk/package.json
npmnanoid^5.1.0packages/sdk/package.json
npmproper-lockfile^4.1.2packages/sdk/package.json
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 15 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@linear/sdk^5.0.0direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.27.0direct
npm@notionhq/client^2.3.0direct
npm@octokit/rest^20.0.0direct
npm@unified-product-graph/core*direct
npm@unified-product-graph/core0.24.0direct
npm@unified-product-graph/sdk*direct
npm@unified-product-graph/sdk0.24.0direct
npm@unified-product-graph/templates0.24.0direct
npmchalk^4.1.2direct
npmchalk^5.3.0direct
npmchokidar^4.0.0direct
npmcommander^13.0.0direct
npminquirer^12.0.0direct
npmnanoid^5.1.0direct
npmora^8.0.0direct
npmpg^8.13.0direct
npmproper-lockfile^4.1.2direct
npmtypescript^5.6.0direct
npmtypescript^5.8.0direct
npmtypescript^5.8.3direct
npm@types/node^22.0.0indirect
npm@types/node^25.6.0indirect
npm@types/pg^8.11.0indirect
npm@types/proper-lockfile^4.1.4indirect
npm@unified-product-graph/adapters*indirect
npm@unified-product-graph/frameworks*indirect
npm@unified-product-graph/mcp-server*indirect
npm@unified-product-graph/mcp-tooling*indirect
npmeslint^9.0.0indirect
npmtsup^8.0.0indirect
npmtsup^8.5.1indirect
npmtsx^4.0.0indirect
npmtsx^4.19.0indirect
npmtypescript-eslint^8.0.0indirect
npmvitest^4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 33 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.