Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 03:06 UTC

unoplatform / Uno.UITest

Unified UI Testing Framework for Uno Platform based applications

C#Custom license★ 13 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Jun 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#wasm#android#ios#uno-platform#csharp#uitest#xamarin-uitest#uwp#winrt#winui

unoplatform/Uno.UITest holds a health index of 32 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (72/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). It was last updated 28 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

32
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

32
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Uno PlatformOrganization · verified domain
704 followers100 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetUno.UITest.Helpers1.0.0-12312 days ago
NuGetUno.UITest.Selenium1.0.0-12312 days ago
NuGetUno.UITest.Xamarin1.0.0-12312 days ago
NuGetUno.UITest1.0.0-12312 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

29At Risk
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 28 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push28
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

32At Risk
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars — 13 stars
7/25Forks — 8 forks
7.2/15Watchers — 21 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars13
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

94Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesdev.azure.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

84Excellent
How it's scored
67.5/80Total downloads — 3,147,785 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesUno.UITest.Helpers, Uno.UITest.Selenium, Uno.UITest.Xamarin, Uno.UITest
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads3,147,785
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

39Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.727

Issue & PR responsiveness

58Moderate
How it's scored
19.1/42Issue resolution — 46% of issues closed
23.6/30PR acceptance — 48/61 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs48
open_issues18
closed_issues15
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.455
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
20.5/25Owner reach — 704 followers of unoplatform
25/25Track record — 100 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers704
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginunoplatform
public_repos100
account_age_days2,633

Package maintenance

53Moderate
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on nuget
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 2,312 days ago
4/20Version history — 1 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesUno.UITest.Helpers, Uno.UITest.Selenium, Uno.UITest.Xamarin, Uno.UITest
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2,312

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://platform.uno
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswasm, android, ios, uno-platform, csharp, uitest, xamarin-uitest, uwp, winrt, winui
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://platform.uno
docs_sitehttps://platform.uno
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 26 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

64Moderate
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: System.Text.Json 7.0.3 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 793 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories27
affected_packages14
assessed_packages113
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 7, moderate 4, low 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 113 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://platform.uno/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://platform.uno/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Sample/Sample.Droid/Sample.Droid.csproj, src/Sample/Sample.UITests/Sample.UITests.csproj, src/Sample/Sample.UWP/Sample.UWP.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Sample/Sample.Droid/Sample.Droid.csproj, src/Sample/Sample.UITests/Sample.UITests.csproj, src/Sample/Sample.UWP/Sample.UWP.csproj, src/Sample/Sample.Wasm/Sample.Wasm.csproj, src/Sample/Sample.iOS/Sample.iOS.csproj, src/Uno.UITest.Helpers/Uno.UITest.Helpers.csproj, src/Uno.UITest.Puppeteer/Uno.UITest.Selenium.csproj, src/Uno.UITest.Xamarin/Uno.UITest.Xamarin.csproj, src/uno.uitest/Uno.UITest.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/108 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes16,248
source_files_sampled108
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — sample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

13GitHub stars
11contributors
0commits, last 12 months
28days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
18open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812021-022023-052025-07

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 03:06 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities26 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.0.0src/Uno.UITest.Helpers/Uno.UITest.Helpers.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.13.0src/Uno.UITest.Helpers/Uno.UITest.Helpers.csproj
NuGetSelenium.WebDriver4.2.0src/Uno.UITest.Puppeteer/Uno.UITest.Selenium.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json7.0.3src/Uno.UITest.Puppeteer/Uno.UITest.Selenium.csproj
NuGetXamarin.UITest4.1.2src/Uno.UITest.Xamarin/Uno.UITest.Xamarin.csproj
NuGetmono.cecil0.11.4src/Uno.UITest.Xamarin/Uno.UITest.Xamarin.csproj
All dependencies 113

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 107 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.0.0direct
NuGetMono.Cecil0.11.4direct
NuGetNUnit3.13.0direct
NuGetSelenium.WebDriver4.2.0direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json7.0.3direct
NuGetXamarin.UITest4.1.2direct
npmajv6.10.0indirect
npmarray-union1.0.2indirect
npmarray-uniq1.0.3indirect
npmasn10.2.4indirect
npmassert-plus1.0.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmaws-sign20.7.0indirect
npmaws41.8.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.0indirect
npmbcrypt-pbkdf1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.1indirect
npmcaseless0.12.0indirect
npmchromedriver74.0.0indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconcat-stream1.6.2indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.2indirect
npmdashdash1.14.1indirect
npmdebug2.6.9indirect
npmdebug4.1.0indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.3indirect
npmdel3.0.0indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmecc-jsbn0.1.2indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmextract-zip1.6.7indirect
npmextsprintf1.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal2.0.1indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.0.0indirect
npmfd-slicer1.0.1indirect
npmforever-agent0.6.1indirect
npmform-data2.3.3indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmgetpass0.1.7indirect
npmglob7.1.4indirect
npmglobby6.1.0indirect
npmhar-schema2.0.0indirect
npmhar-validator5.1.3indirect
npmhttp-signature1.2.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-regex2.1.0indirect
npmis-path-cwd1.0.0indirect
npmis-path-in-cwd1.0.1indirect
npmis-path-inside1.0.1indirect
npmis-typedarray1.0.0indirect
npmis-url1.2.4indirect
npmis22.0.1indirect
npmisarray1.0.0indirect
npmisstream0.1.2indirect
npmjsbn0.1.1indirect
npmjson-schema0.2.3indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stringify-safe5.0.1indirect
npmjsprim1.4.1indirect
npmmime-db1.40.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.24indirect
npmminimatch3.0.4indirect
npmminimist0.0.8indirect
npmmkdirp0.5.1indirect
npmms2.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmoauth-sign0.9.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-map1.2.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-is-inside1.0.2indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmperformance-now2.1.0indirect
npmpify2.3.0indirect
npmpify3.0.0indirect
npmpinkie2.0.4indirect
npmpinkie-promise2.0.1indirect
npmprocess-nextick-args2.0.1indirect
npmpsl1.1.33indirect
npmpunycode1.4.1indirect
npmpunycode2.1.1indirect
npmqs6.5.2indirect
npmreadable-stream2.3.6indirect
npmrequest2.88.0indirect
npmrimraf2.6.3indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsshpk1.16.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.1.1indirect
npmtcp-port-used1.0.1indirect
npmtough-cookie2.4.3indirect
npmtunnel-agent0.6.0indirect
npmtweetnacl0.14.5indirect
npmtypedarray0.0.6indirect
npmuri-js4.2.2indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmuuid3.3.2indirect
npmverror1.10.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyauzl2.4.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.UniversalWindowsPlatform6.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Windows.Compatibility5.0.1indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter3.15.1indirect
NuGetUno.UI3.7.6indirect
NuGetUno.UI.WebAssembly3.7.6indirect
NuGetUno.UniversalImageLoader1.9.33indirect
NuGetUno.Wasm.Bootstrap7.0.20indirect
NuGetUno.Wasm.Bootstrap.DevServer7.0.20indirect
NuGetXamarin.TestCloud.Agent0.23.1indirect
Dependency advisories 14

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 113 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 14 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
json-schema0.2.3indirectcritical10.4.0
minimist0.0.8indirectcritical21.2.6
System.Text.Json7.0.3directhigh18.0.4
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
extract-zip1.6.7indirecthigh2—
form-data2.3.3indirecthigh24.0.6
minimatch3.0.4indirecthigh410.2.3
qs6.5.2indirecthigh36.16.0
uuid3.3.2indirecthigh113.0.1
ajv6.10.0indirectmoderate28.18.0
chromedriver74.0.0indirectmoderate1119.0.1
request2.88.0indirectmoderate13.0.0
tough-cookie2.4.3indirectmoderate14.1.3
debug4.1.0indirectlow14.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with unoplatform/Uno.UITest. Read them side by side →

98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional93unoplatform/Uno.ThemesThis library is designed to help you use the Material, Fluent or Cupertino design system with the Uno PlatformExceptional94reactiveui/ReactiveUIA composable, cross-platform MVVM framework for .NET inspired by functional reactive programming. It moves mutable state out of the user interface, keeps each feature's logic in one readable place, and makes applications easier to test. Supports WPF, WinForms, WinUI, .NET MAUI, Avalonia, Uno Platform, Blazor and Android.Exceptional93unoplatform/uno.extensionsLibraries to ease common developer tasks associated with building multi-platform mobile, desktop and web applications using Uno Platform or WinAppSDK.Exceptional92unoplatform/uno.toolkit.uiA set of custom controls for the WinUI and the Uno Platform not offered out of the box by WinUI, such as Card, TabBar, NavigationBar, etc.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.