Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 12:58 UTC

uozi-tech / cosy

a Comfortable Object-oriented Simplified framework for You

GoNo license detected★ 22 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Mar 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

uozi-tech/cosy holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

uozi-techOrganization
9 followers10 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosyv1.35.1-1936 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 165 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year165
human_commit_share0.55
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.35.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.4/60Stars — 22 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars22
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.926
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance — 107/129 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs107
open_issues0
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs22
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of uozi-tech
14/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginuozi-tech
public_repos10
account_age_days1,180

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history — 193 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/uozi-tech/cosy
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://cosy.uozi.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscurd, gin, go
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://cosy.uozi.org
docs_sitehttps://cosy.uozi.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages103
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 103 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 54 of 55 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.982
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 45 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.45
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 2/225 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes80,721
source_files_sampled225
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

22GitHub stars
4contributors
165commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312024-112025-072026-04

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 12:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/bsm/redislockv0.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/caarlos0/env/v11v11.4.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/elliotchance/orderedmap/v3v3.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/pprofv1.5.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-co-op/gocron/v2v2.22.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-gormigrate/gormigrate/v2v2.1.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/pprofv0.0.0-20260507013755-92041b743c96go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.4-0.20250319132907-e064f32e3674go.mod
Gogithub.com/guregu/null/v6v6.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgtypev1.14.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/file-rotatelogsv2.4.0+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/oschwald/geoip2-golang/v2v2.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pierrec/lz4/v4v4.1.29go.mod
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.62.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/redis/go-redis/v9v9.22.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/samber/lov1.53.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sony/sonyflake/v2v2.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosy-driver-mysqlv0.2.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosy-driver-postgresv0.2.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosy-driver-sqlitev0.2.2go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.3go.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/sqlitev1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/genv0.3.29go.mod
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2go.mod
All dependencies 108

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 37 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/bsm/redislockv0.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/caarlos0/env/v11v11.4.1direct
Gogithub.com/elliotchance/orderedmap/v3v3.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/pprofv1.5.5direct
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-co-op/gocron/v2v2.22.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-gormigrate/gormigrate/v2v2.1.6direct
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.4direct
Gogithub.com/google/pprofv0.0.0-20260507013755-92041b743c96direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.4-0.20250319132907-e064f32e3674direct
Gogithub.com/guregu/null/v6v6.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgtypev1.14.4direct
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/file-rotatelogsv2.4.0+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/oschwald/geoip2-golang/v2v2.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/pierrec/lz4/v4v4.1.29direct
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.62.0direct
Gogithub.com/redis/go-redis/v9v9.22.0direct
Gogithub.com/samber/lov1.53.0direct
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.8direct
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/sony/sonyflake/v2v2.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.16direct
Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosy-driver-mysqlv0.2.4direct
Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosy-driver-postgresv0.2.3direct
Gogithub.com/uozi-tech/cosy-driver-sqlitev0.2.2direct
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0direct
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.3direct
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gogorm.io/driver/sqlitev1.6.0direct
Gogorm.io/genv0.3.29direct
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2direct
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/gopkgv0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonicv1.15.2indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonic/loaderv0.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/base64xv0.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.15indirect
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/ssev1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/localesv0.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/universal-translatorv0.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgiov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/inflectionv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/nowv1.1.5indirect
Gogithub.com/jonboulle/clockworkv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.13-0.20220915233716-71ac16282d12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/leodido/go-urnv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/strftimev1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.12.3indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9statsv0.0.0-20260330125221-c963978e514eindirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.23indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.44indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.3-0.20250322232337-35a7c28c31eeindirect
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golang/v2v2.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstatv0.0.0-20240221224432-82ca36839d55indirect
Gogithub.com/quic-go/qpackv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asmv0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/ugorji/go/codecv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driver/v2v2.8.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/archv0.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20240112132812-db7319d0e0e3indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.39.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.49.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12-0.20260120151049-f2248ac996afindirect
Gogorm.io/datatypesv1.2.7indirect
Gogorm.io/driver/mysqlv1.6.0indirect
Gogorm.io/driver/postgresv1.6.2indirect
Gogorm.io/hintsv1.1.2indirect
Gogorm.io/plugin/dbresolverv1.6.2indirect
npmesbuild^0.28.2indirect
npmvite^8.2.2indirect
npmvitepress^1.6.4indirect
npmvitepress-plugin-legend^2.0.0indirect
npmvue^3.5.42indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 103 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirectunknown30.56.0
golang.org/x/modv0.39.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.