Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 19:18 UTC

uriyyo / fastapi-pagination

FastAPI pagination 📖

PythonMIT★ 1,680 stars⑂ 163 forkssince Nov 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

uriyyo/fastapi-pagination holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Yurii KarabasPersonal account
180 followers65 public repossince Sep 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIfastapi-pagination0.15.164,513,1629630 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume702 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year702
human_commit_share0.11
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases94 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 30 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~20.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count94
latest_release_tag0.15.16
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases20.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
52.3/60Stars1,680 stars
18.4/25Forks163 forks
6.2/15Watchers14 watchers
Inputs used
forks163
stars1,680
watchers14
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads4,513,162 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfastapi-pagination
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,513,162
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth56 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled56
top_contributor_share0.886
How it's scored
41.2/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance1,600/1,702 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs1,600
open_issues5
closed_issues280
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.982
closed_unmerged_prs102
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
16.2/25Owner reach180 followers of uriyyo
25/25Track record65 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers180
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginuriyyo
public_repos65
account_age_days3,266
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history96 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfastapi-pagination
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://uriyyo-fastapi-pagination.netlify.app/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfastapi, fastapi-sqlalchemy, fastapi-pagination, pagination, gino
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://uriyyo-fastapi-pagination.netlify.app/
docs_sitehttps://uriyyo-fastapi-pagination.netlify.app/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Reviewno data
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Code-Review, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:fastapi-pagination@0.15.16 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 10 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checkingfastapi_pagination/ext/py.typed, fastapi_pagination/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance44 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfastapi_pagination/ext/py.typed, fastapi_pagination/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.44
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (fastapi_pagination/ext/py.typed, fastapi_pagination/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/95 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes22,750
source_files_sampled95
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1,680GitHub stars
56contributors
702commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
94releases
1bus factor
5open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-16: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 1680 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 1,672 ★ / 163 ⇿
1,672Stars
163Forks
88Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-16. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

04008001,2001,6002,0001,672163882020-122023-092026-07
Major 0Minor 11Patch 73

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 19:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
n/aCode-ReviewFound no human activity in the last 15 changesets
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIfastapi>=0.140.13pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.13.4pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.8.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 124

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 121 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIfastapi0.141.1direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIaiosqlite0.21.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIasgi-lifespan2.1.0indirect
PyPIasgiref3.12.1indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIbeanie2.2.0indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIcyclic1.0.0indirect
PyPIdirty-equals0.11indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdjango5.2.17indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIelastic-transport9.4.2indirect
PyPIelasticsearch9.5.0indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfaker40.37.0indirect
PyPIfastapi-pagination0.16.0b1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.0indirect
PyPIflaky3.8.1indirect
PyPIfontawesome-markdown0.2.6indirect
PyPIgeomet1.1.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.33.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.56.2indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-core2.6.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-firestore2.28.1indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.5indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.83.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.83.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIiso86012.1.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIlazy-model0.4.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdx-include1.4.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImongoengine0.29.3indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIormar0.26.0indirect
PyPIormar-utils0.2.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpeewee4.4.0indirect
PyPIpiccolo1.36.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.28.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1indirect
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.12indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.2indirect
PyPIpymongo4.17.0indirect
PyPIpypika-tortoise0.6.5indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIrcslice1.1.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIruff0.16.4indirect
PyPIscylla-driver3.29.11indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsqlakeyset2.0.1775222100indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.52indirect
PyPIsqlmodel0.0.39indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.5indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPItarg0.7.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItortoise-orm1.1.8indirect
PyPIty0.0.65indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:fastapi-pagination@0.15.16 pulls in 10 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.