Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 19:57 UTC

use-agent-os / agent-os

The Open Agent Operation System

Python · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 55 stars⑂ 44 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceMCP serverChat botWeb interfacehow this is determined

use-agent-os/agent-os holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AgentOSOrganization
30 followers2 public repossince Jul 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIuse-agent-os2026.9.143,109490 days agoagentchatbotgatewayllmmcprouter

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,420 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,420
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 49 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count49
latest_release_tagv2026.9.14
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

43Weak
How it's scored
28.1/60Stars — 55 stars
13.6/25Forks — 44 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks44
stars55
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.6/80Monthly downloads — 3,109 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesuse-agent-os
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,109
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 31 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled31
top_contributor_share0.42

Issue & PR responsiveness

58Moderate
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
12.4/30PR acceptance — 542/1,313 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs542
open_issues113
closed_issues566
prs_merged_7d23
prs_decided_7d60
prs_merged_30d23
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.834
closed_unmerged_prs771
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.7/25Owner reach — 30 followers of use-agent-os
3.8/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers30
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginuse-agent-os
public_repos2
account_age_days63

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 49 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesuse-agent-os
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json, eslint.config.js, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 17/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 102 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md, src/agentos/identity/templates/bootstrap/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md, src/agentos/identity/templates/bootstrap/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,062

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json, eslint.config.js, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 43 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.43
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 35/1,815 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes271,395
source_files_sampled1,815
oversized_source_files35

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofchat-bot, network-service

Key facts

55GitHub stars
31contributors
1,420commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
49releases
2bus factor
113open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:use-agent-os@2026.9.14; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 44 ⇿
0Stars
44Forks
48Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504442026-072026-082026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 42
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 19:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 17/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities102 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 53
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.3.0frontend/package.json
npm@tabler/icons-react^3.45.0frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.101.2frontend/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1frontend/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1frontend/package.json
npmdompurify^3.4.12frontend/package.json
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1frontend/package.json
npmlightweight-charts^5.2.0frontend/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.25.0frontend/package.json
npmmarked^18.0.7frontend/package.json
npmmotion^12.42.2frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7frontend/package.json
npmreact-router^7.18.1frontend/package.json
npmsonner^2.0.7frontend/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0frontend/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.14frontend/package.json
PyPIstarlette>=0.40,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipart>=0.0.20,<0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.30,<0.43pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.0,<3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.0,<3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlmodel>=0.0.20,<0.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.0,<5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27,<0.29pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.2.0,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbrotli>=1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIstructlog>=24.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.12,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.0,<15.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=13.0,<17.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.20,<0.23pyproject.toml
PyPIapscheduler>=3.10,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlite-vec>=0.1,<0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIhtml2text>=2024.2pyproject.toml
PyPIreadability-lxml>=0.8,<0.9pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.12,<5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools>=5.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpdfplumber>=0.11,<0.12pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow>=10.0,<13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcroniter>=2.0,<7.0pyproject.toml
PyPItomli-w>=1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIyoyo-migrations>=8.2,<10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIprompt-toolkit>=3.0,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIquestionary>=2.0,<3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-docx>=1.1.0,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-pptx>=1.0.0,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenpyxl>=3.1.0,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpypdf>=4.0.0,<7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIreportlab>=4.0.0,<5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-telegram-bot>=20.0,<23.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with use-agent-os/agent-os. Read them side by side →

96AstrBotDevs/AstrBotAI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨Exceptional96agentscope-ai/agentscopeBuild and run agents you can see, understand and trust.Exceptional96vercel/aiThe AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents Exceptional98googleapis/mcp-toolboxMCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional97gptme/gptmeYour agent in your terminal, equipped with local tools: writes code, uses the terminal, browses the web. Make your own persistent autonomous agent on top!Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.