Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-15 22:16 UTC

valdisiljuconoks / LocalizationProvider

Database driven localization provider for .NET applications

C#Apache-2.0★ 180 stars⑂ 48 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗

valdisiljuconoks/LocalizationProvider holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (86/100) and lowest on Security (39/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

valdis iljuconoksPersonal account
138 followers76 public repossince May 2012@Geta

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18Commit volume — 38 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year38
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 134 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~73.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv9.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release134
mean_days_between_releases73.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.5/60Stars — 180 stars
13.9/25Forks — 48 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks48
stars180
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicessonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.947
How it's scored
39.5/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance — 48/65 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs48
open_issues17
closed_issues271
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.941
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.4/25Owner reach — 138 followers of valdisiljuconoks
25/25Track record — 76 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers138
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginvaldisiljuconoks
public_repos76
account_age_days5,259
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://tech-fellow.eu/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsepiserver, translation, language, placeholder, csharp, localization, localization-tool, localization-management, dotnet, dotnet-core, optimizely
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://tech-fellow.eu/
docs_sitehttps://tech-fellow.eu/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 55 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories59
affected_packages16
assessed_packages160
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 10, moderate 5
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 160 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.5/40Legible commit history — 61 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.61
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,850
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — aspnetcore/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore/node_modules/delayed-stream/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 12 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesaspnetcore/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore/node_modules/delayed-stream/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.12
toolchain_manifestsaspnetcore/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Csv/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Csv.csproj, aspnetcore/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Xliff/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Xliff.csproj, aspnetcore/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.csproj, aspnetcore/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AspNetCore/DbLocalizationProvider.AspNetCore.csproj, aspnetcore/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj, aspnetcore/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.AspNetCore.Benchmarks/DbLocalizationProvider.AspNetCore.Benchmarks.csproj, aspnetcore/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.AspNetCore.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj, aspnetcore/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Core.AspNet.ForeignAssembly/DbLocalizationProvider.Core.AspNet.ForeignAssembly.csproj, aspnetcore/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Core.AspNetSample/DbLocalizationProvider.Core.AspNetSample.csproj, aspnetcore/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Core.AzFuncSample/DbLocalizationProvider.Core.AzFuncSample.csproj, common/Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.PostgreSql.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.PostgreSql.Tests.csproj, common/Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.SqlServer.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.SqlServer.Tests.csproj, common/Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Tests.csproj, common/Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Xliff.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.Xliff.Tests.csproj, common/perf/DbLocalizationProvider.Benchmarks/DbLocalizationProvider.Benchmarks.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Abstractions/DbLocalizationProvider.Abstractions.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.Models/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.Models.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Csv/DbLocalizationProvider.Csv.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.AzureTables/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.AzureTables.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.MongoDb/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.MongoDb.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.PostgreSQL/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.PostgreSql.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.SqlServer/DbLocalizationProvider.Storage.SqlServer.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Translator.Azure/DbLocalizationProvider.Translator.Azure.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider.Xliff/DbLocalizationProvider.Xliff.csproj, common/src/DbLocalizationProvider/DbLocalizationProvider.csproj, optimizely/samples/AlloySampleSite/AlloySampleSite.csproj, optimizely/samples/Optimizely.Alloy.Cms13.AsNuget/Optimizely.Alloy.Cms13.AsNuget.csproj, optimizely/samples/Optimizely.Alloy.Cms13/Optimizely.Alloy.Cms13.csproj, optimizely/src/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.EPiServer/DbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.EPiServer.csproj, optimizely/src/DbLocalizationProvider.EPiServer/DbLocalizationProvider.EPiServer.csproj, optimizely/src/DbLocalizationProvider.MigrationTool/DbLocalizationProvider.MigrationTool.csproj, optimizely/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.EPiServer.Sample/DbLocalizationProvider.EPiServer.Sample.csproj, optimizely/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.EPiServer.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.EPiServer.Tests.csproj, optimizely/tests/DbLocalizationProvider.MigrationTool.Tests/DbLocalizationProvider.MigrationTool.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
53.6/55Manageable file sizes — 21/808 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes280,933
source_files_sampled808
oversized_source_files21
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

180GitHub stars
11contributors
38commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
17open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 48 ⇿
0Stars
48Forks
31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504822016-032021-062026-10
Major 2Minor 2Patch 13

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-15 22:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities55 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 160

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 160 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/parser7.23.3indirect
npm@fortawesome/fontawesome-free5.15.4indirect
npm@fortawesome/fontawesome-free6.4.2indirect
npm@popperjs/core2.11.8indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc2.7.15indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmaxios1.6.2indirect
npmbootstrap5.3.2indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcsstype3.1.2indirect
npmdebounce2.0.0indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdownloadjs1.4.7indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.15.3indirect
npmform-data4.0.0indirect
npmjquery3.7.1indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmnanoid3.3.7indirect
npmopen-iconic1.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpopper.js1.15.0indirect
npmpostcss8.4.31indirect
npmproxy-from-env1.1.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.0.2indirect
npmvee-validate2.2.15indirect
npmvue2.7.15indirect
npmvue-ads-form-builder0.1.15indirect
npmvue-ads-pagination2.1.7indirect
npmvue-ads-table-tree2.4.2indirect
npmvue-directive-tooltip1.6.3indirect
npmvue-json-excel0.2.99indirect
npmvue-perfect-scrollbar0.1.0indirect
NuGetAzure.AI.Translation.Text2.0.0indirect
NuGetAzure.Data.Tables12.11.0indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetCastle.Core4.2.1indirect
NuGetCastle.Windsor4.1.0indirect
NuGetCommandLineParser2.4.3indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetCsvHelper19.0.0indirect
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0indirect
NuGetDbLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.EPiServer9.0.0indirect
NuGetEntityFramework6.1.2indirect
NuGetEntityFramework6.2.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS11.14.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS12.32.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS13.1.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.AspNet11.14.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.AspNetCore13.1.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.AspNetCore.HtmlHelpers12.22.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.AspNetCore.TagHelpers12.22.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.Core11.13.1indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.Core11.14.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.TinyMce1.0.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.UI11.23.7indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.UI.AspNetIdentity13.1.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.UI.Core11.23.7indirect
NuGetEPiServer.CMS.UI.Core13.1.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.DeveloperTools3.3.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.DeveloperTools4.1.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.Framework11.13.1indirect
NuGetEPiServer.Framework11.14.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.Framework.AspNet11.14.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.Hosting12.22.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.Logging.Log4Net2.2.2indirect
NuGetEPiServer.OpenIDConnect.UI3.11.3indirect
NuGetEPiServer.Packaging3.4.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.Packaging.UI3.4.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.ServiceApi7.2.0indirect
NuGetEPiServer.ServiceLocation.StructureMap2.0.3indirect
NuGetFakeItEasy9.0.1indirect
NuGetLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Csv9.0.0indirect
NuGetLocalizationProvider.AdminUI.AspNetCore.Xliff9.0.0indirect
NuGetLocalizationProvider.Storage.SqlServer9.0.0indirect
NuGetLocalizationProvider.Translator.Azure9.0.0indirect
NuGetlog4net2.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvc5.2.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Providers.Core2.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Razor3.2.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebPages3.2.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Identity.EntityFrameworkCore10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Identity.UI10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Functions.Extensions1.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces1.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode1.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.5.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient2.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient5.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient6.1.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient.SNI2.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client4.14.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens5.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Logging5.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Protocols5.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.OpenIdConnect5.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Tokens5.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Net.Compilers2.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Sdk.Functions4.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.6.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.Platforms1.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin3.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Host.SystemWeb3.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.300indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Tpl.Dataflow4.5.24indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design10.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Infrastructure1.0.0.0indirect
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.9.0indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.0indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json11.0.2indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json9.0.1indirect
NuGetNpgsql10.0.3indirect
NuGetNuGet.Core2.5.0indirect
NuGetOptimizely.Cms.Forms.Service1.0.0indirect
NuGetOwin1.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.AspNetCore8.0.3indirect
NuGetSerilog.Settings.Configuration8.0.4indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File6.0.0indirect
NuGetStructureMap4.7.1indirect
NuGetstructuremap.web4.0.0.315indirect
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations4.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.Common4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.SqlClient4.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt5.6.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit.Lightweight4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe4.5.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.AccessControl4.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Xml4.4.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Permissions4.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Principal.Windows4.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.AccessControl4.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.2indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetTestcontainers.PostgreSql4.12.0indirect
NuGetWangkanai.Detection6.11.3indirect
NuGetWangkanai.Detection8.20.0indirect
NuGetXliff.OM-Signed1.0.3indirect
NuGetXliff.OM-Signed1.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.abstractions2.0.0indirect
NuGetxunit.assert2.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit.core2.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.core2.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.execution2.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.console2.4.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
Dependency advisories 16

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 160 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 16 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
log4net2.0.8indirectcritical23.3.0
axios1.6.2indirecthigh311.20.0
form-data4.0.0indirecthigh24.0.6
Microsoft.Data.SqlClient2.0.1indirecthigh25.1.3
Microsoft.Owin3.0.1indirecthigh26.0.5
nanoid3.3.7indirecthigh45.1.16
Newtonsoft.Json11.0.2indirecthigh113.0.1
Newtonsoft.Json9.0.1indirecthigh113.0.1
postcss8.4.31indirecthigh48.5.23
source-map-js1.0.2indirecthigh11.2.2
System.Data.SqlClient4.4.0indirecthigh25.1.3
follow-redirects1.15.3indirectmoderate31.16.0
Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens5.6.0indirectmoderate17.1.2
System.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt5.6.0indirectmoderate17.1.2
System.Security.Cryptography.Xml4.4.2indirectmoderate16.0.8
vue2.7.15indirectmoderate13.0.0-alpha.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.