Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 05:58 UTC

vctt94 / dcrpoker

Go · DartNo license detected★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindMobile applicationDesktop applicationTerminal interfacehow this is determined

vctt94/dcrpoker holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (67/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (17/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

VcTTPersonal account
29 followers45 public repossince Oct 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/vctt94/pokerbisonrelaypoints to another repo — not scoredv0.0.2-4156 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 10 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence16/52 weeks with commits
16/18Commit volume60 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year60
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push10
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 156 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~43.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv0.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release156
mean_days_between_releases43.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

17Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars5
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance56/56 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs56
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.6/25Owner reach29 followers of vctt94
24.1/25Track record45 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginvctt94
public_repos45
account_age_days3,996
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

28At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
0/7.5Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate2.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
9.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: google.golang.org/grpc 1.64.0 (critical 9.1)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.6/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 805 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories67
affected_packages6
assessed_packages66
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 66 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.4/40Legible commit history56 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.683
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod, pokerui/flutterui/plugin/android/build.gradle, pokerui/flutterui/plugin/android/golib/build.gradle (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 82
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, pokerui/flutterui/plugin/android/build.gradle, pokerui/flutterui/plugin/android/golib/build.gradle, pokerui/flutterui/plugin/example/android/app/build.gradle, pokerui/flutterui/plugin/example/android/build.gradle, pokerui/flutterui/plugin/example/android/golib/build.gradle, pokerui/flutterui/pokerui/android/app/build.gradle, pokerui/flutterui/pokerui/android/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
53.1/55Manageable file sizes9/261 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes152,714
source_files_sampled261
oversized_source_files9
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)pkg/rpc/poker.proto, pkg/rpc/pokerreferee.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespkg/rpc/poker.proto, pkg/rpc/pokerreferee.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
1contributors
60commits, last 12 months
10days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • go package 'github.com/vctt94/pokerbisonrelay' points at a different repository (https://github.com/vctt94/pokerbisonrelay); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.1 / 10
2.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 05:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/chehsunliu/pokerv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/companyzero/bisonrelayv0.2.4-0.20250321132913-c1cc5b0fd438go.mod
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/chaincfg/chainhashv1.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/chaincfg/v3v3.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/crypto/blake256v1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrutil/v4v4.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/rpcclient/v8v8.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/txscript/v4v4.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/wirev1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/slogv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.28go.mod
Gogithub.com/pbnjay/memoryv0.0.0-20210728143218-7b4eea64cf58go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/vctt94/bisonbotkitv0.0.2-0.20251015145737-a3703422c6edgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/mobilev0.0.0-20240604190613-2782386b8afdgo.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.64.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.6go.mod
All dependencies 66

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 44 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea1.3.4direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/chehsunliu/poker0.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/companyzero/bisonrelay0.2.4-0.20250321132913-c1cc5b0fd438direct
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/chaincfg/chainhash1.0.4direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/chaincfg/v33.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/crypto/blake2561.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v44.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrutil/v44.0.2direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/rpcclient/v88.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/txscript/v44.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/wire1.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/decred/slog1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite31.14.28direct
Gogithub.com/pbnjay/memory0.0.0-20210728143218-7b4eea64cf58direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/vctt94/bisonbotkit0.0.2-0.20251015145737-a3703422c6eddirect
Gogolang.org/x/mobile0.0.0-20240604190613-2782386b8afddirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.64.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.36.6direct
Gogithub.com/agl/ed255190.0.0-20170116200512-5312a6153412indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v22.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile0.2.3-0.20250311203215-f60798e515dcindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbuf0.0.13-0.20250311204145-2c3ea96c31ddindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/term0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/companyzero/sntrup45917610.0.0-20220309191932-9e0f3af2f07aindirect
Gogithub.com/dchest/siphash1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/base581.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/bech321.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/blockchain/stake/v55.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/crypto/ripemd1601.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/database/v33.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/edwards/v22.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrjson/v44.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/gcs/v44.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/rpc/jsonrpc/types/v44.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/go-socks1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/erikgeiser/coninput0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0findirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocket1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/jrick/logrotate1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v22.2.8indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-localereader0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidth0.0.16indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/ansi0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreader0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenv0.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/uniseg0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internal1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfo0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.18.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.28.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.12.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.31.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.23.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.22.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20240318140521-94a12d6c2237indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Golukechampine.com/blake31.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 66 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpc1.64.0directcritical121.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/crypto0.36.0indirectcritical350.56.0
golang.org/x/net0.28.0indirectmoderate161.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/mod0.18.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sys0.31.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.23.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.