Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 09:37 UTC

vivliostyle / vivliostyle-cli

⚒ Supercharge command-line publication workflow.

TypeScriptAGPL-3.0★ 236 stars⑂ 30 forkssince Jul 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

vivliostyle/vivliostyle-cli holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (66/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

VivliostyleOrganization
159 followers31 public repossince Jul 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@vivliostyle/cli11.4.039,9351850 days agovivliostyle

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 230 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year230
human_commit_share0.77
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~14.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv11.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases14.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.5/60Stars — 236 stars
12.2/25Forks — 30 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks30
stars236
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadgen.net
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
61.4/80Monthly downloads — 39,935 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@vivliostyle/cli
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads39,935
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.572
How it's scored
35.4/42Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 582/653 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs582
open_issues41
closed_issues221
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.844
closed_unmerged_prs71
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.8/25Owner reach — 159 followers of vivliostyle
23/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers159
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginvivliostyle
public_repos31
account_age_days4,472

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 185 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@vivliostyle/cli
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.vivliostyle.org/cli/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjavascript, headless-chrome, vivliostyle, pdf, vite
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.vivliostyle.org/cli/
docs_sitehttps://docs.vivliostyle.org/cli/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages9
unassessed_packages28
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 9 resolved dependencies against OSV. 28 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 77 of 77 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,815
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — examples/with-astro/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 13 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsexamples/with-astro/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.13
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 2/207 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes83,682
source_files_sampled207
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

236GitHub stars
15contributors
230commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
41open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@vivliostyle/cli@11.4.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 30 ⇿
0Stars
30Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025303032017-122022-052026-10
Major 5Minor 43Patch 47

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10
6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 09:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 10/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@babel/code-frame7.26.2package.json
npm@bluwy/giget-core0.1.3package.json
npm@clack/core1.0.0-alpha.6package.json
npm@clack/prompts1.0.0-alpha.6package.json
npm@humanwhocodes/momoa3.3.8package.json
npm@napi-rs/canvas0.1.69package.json
npm@npmcli/arborist9.1.7package.json
npm@puppeteer/browsers3.2.2package.json
npm@types/command-exists1.2.3package.json
npm@vivliostyle/jsdom25.0.1-vivliostyle-cli.2package.json
npm@vivliostyle/vfm2.7.2package.json
npm@vivliostyle/viewer2.45.2package.json
npmajv8.18.0package.json
npmajv-formats3.0.1package.json
npmarchiver7.0.1package.json
npmbcp-47-match2.0.3package.json
npmchange-case5.4.4package.json
npmcommand-exists1.2.9package.json
npmcommander13.1.0package.json
npmdebug4.4.0package.json
npmdecamelize6.0.0package.json
npmdompurify3.4.13package.json
npmescape-string-regexp5.0.0package.json
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.1.3package.json
npmfast-xml-builder1.1.7package.json
npmfast-xml-parser5.7.0package.json
npmfs-extra11.2.0package.json
npmgithub-slugger2.0.0package.json
npmhandlebars4.7.10package.json
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5package.json
npmhastscript9.0.1package.json
npmmime-types3.0.1package.json
npmmupdf1.28.0package.json
npmnode-fetch-native1.6.7package.json
npmnode-stream-zip1.15.0package.json
npmnpm-package-arg12.0.2package.json
npmos-locale8.0.0package.json
npmpicomatch4.0.4package.json
npmpostcss8.5.26package.json
npmpostcss-load-config6.0.1package.json
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0package.json
npmpress-ready4.0.3package.json
npmpuppeteer-core25.10.0package.json
npmresolve.exports2.0.3package.json
npmsemver7.7.1package.json
npmsirv3.0.1package.json
npmsisteransi1.0.5package.json
npmterminal-link4.0.0package.json
npmtinyexec1.0.2package.json
npmtinyglobby0.2.13package.json
npmtitle-case4.3.2package.json
npmtmp0.2.7package.json
npmupath2.0.1package.json
npmuuid14.0.0package.json
npmvalibot1.4.2package.json
npmvalidate-npm-package-name7.0.0package.json
npmvfile4.2.1package.json
npmvite8.1.0package.json
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0package.json
npmwhatwg-mimetype4.0.0package.json
npmyocto-spinner1.2.2package.json
npmyoctocolors2.1.1package.json
All dependencies 37

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 37 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@11ty/eleventy^3.0.0indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-img^6.0.1indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-navigation^0.3.5indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-plugin-rss^2.0.2indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-plugin-syntaxhighlight^5.0.0indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-plugin-vite^6.0.0indirect
npm@asciidoctor/core^3.0.4indirect
npm@astrojs/mdx^7.0.0indirect
npm@astrojs/sitemap^3.7.3indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl12.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl12.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/postcss^4.3.3indirect
npm@vivliostyle/theme-bunko^0.3.0indirect
npm@zachleat/heading-anchors^1.0.1indirect
npmastro^7.0.2indirect
npmcross-env^7.0.3indirect
npmhast-util-from-html^1.0.2indirect
npmluxon^3.5.0indirect
npmpnpm12.3.4indirect
npmprismjs^1.29.0indirect
npmrehype-expressive-code^0.37.0indirect
npmrehype-stringify^8.0.0indirect
npmremark-parse^9.0.0indirect
npmremark-rehype^9.0.0indirect
npmremark-ruby^0.4.0indirect
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3indirect
npmunified^9.2.0indirect
npmunified^9.2.2indirect
npmvivliostyle-theme-scripts^0.3.1indirect
npmzod^3.23.8indirect
npmzod-validation-error^3.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 9 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 28 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.