Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 08:09 UTC

vivliostyle / vivliostyle-print

🖨 Use Vivliostyle for printing

JavaScriptAGPL-3.0★ 45 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Sep 2018View on GitHub ↗

vivliostyle/vivliostyle-print holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (24/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

VivliostyleOrganization
146 followers29 public repossince Jul 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@vivliostyle/print2.44.15,1011108 days agoprintvivliostylelayoutpages

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 8 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence15/52 weeks with commits
14.7/18Commit volume42 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year42
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~19.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.44.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases19.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.7/60Stars45 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars45
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.4/80Monthly downloads5,101 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@vivliostyle/print
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads5,101
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 75% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.746
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
24/30PR acceptance8/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs8
open_issues0
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15.6/25Owner reach146 followers of vivliostyle
22.8/25Track record29 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers146
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginvivliostyle
public_repos29
account_age_days4,377
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history110 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@vivliostyle/print
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

41Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsvivliostyle
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated11
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive7
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes10,490
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

45GitHub stars
3contributors
42commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 08:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 185

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.12.11indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.25.9indirect
npm@babel/highlight7.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.24.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.24.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc0.4.3indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.5.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema1.2.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@vivliostyle/core2.31.0indirect
npmacorn7.4.1indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmajv8.17.1indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.3indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmastral-regex2.0.0indirect
npmasync3.2.6indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommander11.1.0indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.3.7indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmemail-addresses5.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmenquirer2.4.1indirect
npmesbuild0.24.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint7.32.0indirect
npmeslint-scope5.1.1indirect
npmeslint-utils2.1.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys1.3.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys2.1.0indirect
npmespree7.3.1indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmesquery1.6.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-diff1.3.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfast-uri3.0.3indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfilename-reserved-regex2.0.0indirect
npmfilenamify4.3.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-cache-dir3.3.2indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.2.0indirect
npmflatted3.3.2indirect
npmfs-extra11.2.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfunctional-red-black-tree1.0.1indirect
npmgh-pages6.2.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore4.0.6indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml3.14.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmjsonfile6.1.0indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlodash.truncate4.4.2indirect
npmmake-dir3.1.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpkg-dir4.2.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmprogress2.0.3indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmregexpp3.2.0indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmsemver7.6.3indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmslice-ansi4.0.0indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmstrip-outer1.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtable6.8.2indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtrim-repeated1.0.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.1indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmv8-compile-cache2.4.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.