Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 19:36 UTC

voxgig / apidef

API model definition

TypeScript · GoMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Aug 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

voxgig/apidef holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

voxgigOrganization · verified domain
4 followers39 public repossince Nov 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/voxgig/apidef/gov0.3.1-1113 days ago
npm@voxgig/apidef8.2.24,473912 days agovoxgigapidefapisdk

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume286 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year286
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases7 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_taggo/v0.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases18.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.7/80Monthly downloads4,473 downloads/month across go, npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/voxgig/apidef/go, @voxgig/apidef
dependents
ecosystemsgo, npm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,473
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 82% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.816
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
29.2/30PR acceptance39/40 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs39
open_issues4
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d24
prs_decided_30d25
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach4 followers of voxgig
23.7/25Track record39 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginvoxgig
public_repos39
account_age_days3,209

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on go, npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history91 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/voxgig/apidef/go, @voxgig/apidef
ecosystemsgo, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@voxgig/apidef@8.2.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 32 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history95 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.95
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,180
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingts/src/tsconfig.json, ts/test/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice59 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsts/src/tsconfig.json, ts/test/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.59
toolchain_manifestsgo/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes3/91 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes66,115
source_files_sampled91
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)ts/test/def/graphql-linearish-def.graphql, ts/test/def/solar-1.0.0-graphql-def.graphql
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filests/test/def/graphql-linearish-def.graphql, ts/test/def/solar-1.0.0-graphql-def.graphql
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
4contributors
286commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
4open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212024-102025-092026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 19:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/tabnas/parser/gov0.8.0go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/tabnas/yaml/gov0.5.1go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/voxgig/struct/gov0.1.3go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/voxgig/util/gov0.1.5go/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0go/go.mod
npmdiff9.0.0ts/package.json
npmordu4.3.0ts/package.json
npmpino10.3.1ts/package.json
npmpino-pretty13.1.3ts/package.json
All dependencies 109

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 100 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/tabnas/parser/gov0.8.0direct
Gogithub.com/tabnas/yaml/gov0.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/voxgig/struct/gov0.1.3direct
Gogithub.com/voxgig/util/gov0.1.5direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0direct
npmdiff9.0.0direct
npmordu4.3.0direct
npmpino10.3.1direct
npmpino-pretty13.1.3direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/rjrodger/shape/gov0.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tabnas/debug/gov0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tabnas/json/gov0.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tabnas/jsonic/gov0.6.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/base641.1.2indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/base6417.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/buffers1.2.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/buffers17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/codegen1.0.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/codegen17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-core4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-fsa4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node-builtins4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node-to-fsa4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-node-utils4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-print4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/fs-snapshot4.68.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pack1.21.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pack17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pointer1.0.2indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pointer17.67.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/util1.9.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/util17.67.0indirect
npm@pinojs/redact0.4.0indirect
npm@tabnas/debug0.3.1indirect
npm@tabnas/directive0.5.1indirect
npm@tabnas/expr0.5.1indirect
npm@tabnas/json0.5.2indirect
npm@tabnas/jsonic0.6.0indirect
npm@tabnas/multisource0.5.1indirect
npm@tabnas/parser0.8.0indirect
npm@tabnas/path0.3.1indirect
npm@tabnas/yaml0.5.1indirect
npm@types/node25.9.5indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@voxgig/struct0.2.2indirect
npm@voxgig/util0.5.4indirect
npmaontu0.50.1indirect
npmatomic-sleep1.0.0indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmdateformat4.6.3indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.5indirect
npmfast-copy4.0.4indirect
npmfast-safe-stringify2.1.1indirect
npmglob-to-regex.js1.2.0indirect
npmgraphql17.0.2indirect
npmhelp-me5.0.0indirect
npmhyperdyperid1.2.0indirect
npmjostraca0.31.2indirect
npmjoycon3.1.1indirect
npmmemfs4.68.1indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmnua2.3.1indirect
npmon-exit-leak-free2.1.2indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpino-abstract-transport3.0.0indirect
npmpino-std-serializers7.1.0indirect
npmprocess-warning5.1.0indirect
npmpump3.0.4indirect
npmquick-format-unescaped4.0.4indirect
npmreal-require0.2.0indirect
npmreal-require1.0.0indirect
npmsafe-stable-stringify2.5.0indirect
npmsecure-json-parse4.1.0indirect
npmshape10.1.3indirect
npmsonic-boom4.2.1indirect
npmsplit24.2.0indirect
npmstrict-event-emitter-types2.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments5.0.3indirect
npmthingies2.6.1indirect
npmthread-stream4.2.0indirect
npmtree-dump1.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@voxgig/apidef@8.2.2 pulls in 32 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo, npm.