Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 05:32 UTC

vpsfreecz / terraform-provider-vpsadmin

Terraform provider for vpsAdmin

Go · NixMPL-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 1 forksince Apr 2019View on GitHub ↗

KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

vpsfreecz/terraform-provider-vpsadmin holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

vpsFree.cz z.s.Organization

42 followers83 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/vpsfreecz/terraform-provider-vpsadmin	v1.5.0	-	8	17 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

75Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
12.5/36	Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18	Commit volume — 67 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	67
human_commit_share	0.83
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	18

Release discipline

84Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 7 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~280.8 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	7
latest_release_tag	v1.5.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	17
mean_days_between_releases	280.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
0/25	Forks — 1 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1
stars	8
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.984

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
10/30	PR acceptance — 1/3 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	1
open_issues	0
closed_issues	10
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
11.7/25	Owner reach — 42 followers of vpsfreecz
25/25	Track record — 83 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	42
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	vpsfreecz
public_repos	83
account_age_days	5,245

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20	Version history — 8 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/vpsfreecz/terraform-provider-vpsadmin
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	55
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	80
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 80 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

80Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.3/40	Legible commit history — 55 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.663
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	4,194

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	yes
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	get-token/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/42 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	19,496
source_files_sampled	42
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars

2contributors

67commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

7releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10

4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 05:32 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
8	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 7

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/vpsfreecz/vpsadmin-go-client	`v0.0.0-20260604065514-1d9240f3d27b`	get-token/go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.45.0`	get-token/go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cty	`v1.5.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docs	`v0.25.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go	`v0.31.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2	`v2.40.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/vpsfreecz/vpsadmin-go-client	`v0.0.0-20260604065514-1d9240f3d27b`	go.mod

All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 73 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cty	`v1.5.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docs	`v0.25.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-go	`v0.31.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2	`v2.40.1`	direct
Go	github.com/vpsfreecz/vpsadmin-go-client	`0.0.0-20200313072921-575ba716cf27`	direct
Go	github.com/vpsfreecz/vpsadmin-go-client	`v0.0.0-20260604065514-1d9240f3d27b`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.45.0`	direct
Go	dario.cat/mergo	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/agext/levenshtein	`v1.2.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15	`v15.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v17	`v17.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/armon/go-radix	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bgentry/speakeasy	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4	`v4.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/burntsushi/toml	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2	`v2.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cloudflare/circl	`v1.6.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.19.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/protobuf	`v1.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`v0.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/cli	`v1.1.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/errwrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-checkpoint	`v0.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp	`v0.5.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-hclog	`v1.6.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin	`v1.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp	`v0.7.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-uuid	`v1.0.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/go-version	`v1.9.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/hc-install	`v0.9.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2	`v2.24.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/logutils	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-exec	`v0.25.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-json	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-log	`v0.11.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-address	`v0.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchost	`v0.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/yamux	`v0.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/huandu/xstrings	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kunde21/markdownfmt/v3	`v3.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/masterminds/goutils	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/masterminds/semver/v3	`v3.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/masterminds/sprig/v3	`v3.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.15`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.28`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/copystructure	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface	`v1.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrap	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/reflectwalk	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/oklog/run	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/posener/complete	`v1.2.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/protonmail/go-crypto	`v1.4.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/shopspring/decimal	`v1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack	`v4.0.4+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5	`v5.4.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2	`v2.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark-meta	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/zclconf/go-cty	`v1.19.0`	indirect
Go	go.abhg.dev/goldmark/frontmatter	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`0.0.0-20190426145343-a29dc8fdc734`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.55.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20260824195058-e88cd73687aa`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.40.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.58.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.41.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.49.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/appengine	`v1.6.8`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20260831171406-18b4a7587f8a`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.83.2`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.12`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v2	`v2.4.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 80 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`0.0.0-20190426145343-a29dc8fdc734`	indirect	critical	52	`3.4.0`
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.55.0`	indirect	unknown	3	`0.56.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records