Public recordWeak
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 19:38 UTC
vszakats / harbour-core
Harbour fork (from https://github.com/harbour/core) + updates & fixes = 3.4
vszakats/harbour-core holds a health index of 42 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (72/100) and lowest on Vitality (20/100). It was last updated 289 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
42
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
42
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Viktor SzakatsPersonal account
226 followers35 public repossince Feb 2012
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
20
Development activity
7Critical
How it's scored
| 3.6/36 | Push recency — last push 289 days ago |
| 0.7/36 | Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits |
| 2.7/18 | Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 1 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 289 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 1 |
Release discipline
40Weak
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 3 releases published |
| 0/36 | Release recency — latest release 3,889 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~121.3 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 3 |
| latest_release_tag | v3.4.0dev |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 3,889 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 121.3 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
72
Popularity & adoption
58Moderate
How it's scored
| 31.7/60 | Stars — 91 stars |
| 16.4/25 | Forks — 94 forks |
| 9.4/15 | Watchers — 50 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 94 |
| stars | 91 |
| watchers | 50 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
87Excellent
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 16.9/22.5 | License — license file present, not a recognized license |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 13.5/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 7.2/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | yes |
| has_code_of_conduct | yes |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
46
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 6.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 38 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 38 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.729 |
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 16.7/30 | PR acceptance — 40/72 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 40 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | — |
| prs_decided_7d | — |
| prs_merged_30d | — |
| prs_decided_30d | — |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 32 |
| first_time_authors_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
63Moderate
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 16.9/25 | Owner reach — 226 followers of vszakats |
| 23.3/25 | Track record — 35 public repos, account ~14 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 226 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | vszakats |
| public_repos | 35 |
| account_age_days | 5,264 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
59
Engineering practices
38Weak
How it's scored
| 0/24 | CI workflows |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://vszakats.github.io/hb/ |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 10 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | harbour, xbase, cross-platform, compiler, clipper, cross, c, scripting-language, dbf, tui |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://vszakats.github.io/hb/ |
| docs_site | https://vszakats.github.io/hb/ |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
29
Security posture
29At Risk
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.2/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 12 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 6 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 2.9 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
58
Agent context & guidance
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile, contrib/Makefile, doc/Makefile, include/Makefile, src/3rd/Makefile, src/3rd/hbdossrl/Makefile, src/3rd/hbpmcom/Makefile, src/3rd/pcre/Makefile, src/3rd/pcre2/Makefile, src/3rd/png/Makefile, src/3rd/zlib/Makefile, src/Makefile, src/codepage/Makefile, src/common/Makefile, src/compiler/Makefile, src/debug/Makefile, src/dynlib/2nd/Makefile, src/dynlib/Makefile, src/hbextern/Makefile, src/lang/Makefile, src/macro/Makefile, src/main/Makefile, src/nortl/Makefile, src/pp/Makefile, src/rdd/Makefile, src/rdd/dbfcdx/Makefile, src/rdd/dbffpt/Makefile, src/rdd/dbfnsx/Makefile, src/rdd/dbfntx/Makefile, src/rdd/hbsix/Makefile, src/rdd/hsx/Makefile, src/rdd/nulsys/Makefile, src/rdd/usrrdd/Makefile, src/rtl/Makefile, src/rtl/gt_tpl/Makefile, src/rtl/gtcgi/Makefile, src/rtl/gtcrs/Makefile, src/rtl/gtdos/Makefile, src/rtl/gtgui/Makefile, src/rtl/gtos2/Makefile, src/rtl/gtpca/Makefile, src/rtl/gtsln/Makefile, src/rtl/gtstd/Makefile, src/rtl/gttrm/Makefile, src/rtl/gtwin/Makefile, src/rtl/gtwvt/Makefile, src/rtl/gtxwc/Makefile, src/vm/Makefile, src/vm/maindllh/Makefile, src/vm/maindllp/Makefile, src/vm/mainstd/Makefile, src/vm/mainwin/Makefile, src/vm/vmmt/Makefile, tests/build/Makefile, utils/Makefile, utils/hbi18n/Makefile, utils/hbmk2/Makefile, utils/hbspeed/Makefile, utils/hbtest/Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — C (statically typed) |
| 0/10 | Reproducible environment |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no data |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile, contrib/Makefile, doc/Makefile, include/Makefile, src/3rd/Makefile, src/3rd/hbdossrl/Makefile, src/3rd/hbpmcom/Makefile, src/3rd/pcre/Makefile, src/3rd/pcre2/Makefile, src/3rd/png/Makefile, src/3rd/zlib/Makefile, src/Makefile, src/codepage/Makefile, src/common/Makefile, src/compiler/Makefile, src/debug/Makefile, src/dynlib/2nd/Makefile, src/dynlib/Makefile, src/hbextern/Makefile, src/lang/Makefile, src/macro/Makefile, src/main/Makefile, src/nortl/Makefile, src/pp/Makefile, src/rdd/Makefile, src/rdd/dbfcdx/Makefile, src/rdd/dbffpt/Makefile, src/rdd/dbfnsx/Makefile, src/rdd/dbfntx/Makefile, src/rdd/hbsix/Makefile, src/rdd/hsx/Makefile, src/rdd/nulsys/Makefile, src/rdd/usrrdd/Makefile, src/rtl/Makefile, src/rtl/gt_tpl/Makefile, src/rtl/gtcgi/Makefile, src/rtl/gtcrs/Makefile, src/rtl/gtdos/Makefile, src/rtl/gtgui/Makefile, src/rtl/gtos2/Makefile, src/rtl/gtpca/Makefile, src/rtl/gtsln/Makefile, src/rtl/gtstd/Makefile, src/rtl/gttrm/Makefile, src/rtl/gtwin/Makefile, src/rtl/gtwvt/Makefile, src/rtl/gtxwc/Makefile, src/vm/Makefile, src/vm/maindllh/Makefile, src/vm/maindllp/Makefile, src/vm/mainstd/Makefile, src/vm/mainwin/Makefile, src/vm/vmmt/Makefile, tests/build/Makefile, utils/Makefile, utils/hbi18n/Makefile, utils/hbmk2/Makefile, utils/hbspeed/Makefile, utils/hbtest/Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
96Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — C (statically typed) |
| 51.4/55 | Manageable file sizes — 96/1,456 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | C |
| largest_source_bytes | 7,218,239 |
| source_files_sampled | 1,456 |
| oversized_source_files | 96 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
91GitHub stars
38contributors
1commits, last 12 months
289days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
| n/a | Dangerous-Workflow | no workflows found |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 9 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| n/a | Pinned-Dependencies | no dependencies found |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| n/a | Token-Permissions | No tokens found |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.