Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 21:21 UTC

w3c / webref

Machine-readable references of terms defined in web browser specifications

JavaScriptMIT★ 449 stars⑂ 127 forkssince Jul 2017View on GitHub ↗

w3c/webref holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (32/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

7,662 followers1,096 public repossince Aug 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

57Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume314 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year314
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year44
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
43/60Stars449 stars
17.5/25Forks127 forks
7.4/15Watchers22 watchers
Inputs used
forks127
stars449
watchers22
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 29% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth14 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.29
How it's scored
31.3/42Issue resolution74% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance1,540/1,751 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,540
open_issues53
closed_issues155
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.745
closed_unmerged_prs211
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach7,662 followers of w3c
25/25Track record1,096 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers7,662
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginw3c
public_repos1,096
account_age_days5,802
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://w3c.github.io/webref/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsidl, css, definitions-data, web-platform
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://w3c.github.io/webref/
docs_sitehttps://w3c.github.io/webref/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/40 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes25,551
source_files_sampled40
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

449GitHub stars
14contributors
314commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
2bus factor
53open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'webref' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 21:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 181 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@actions/core3.0.1indirect
npm@actions/exec3.0.0indirect
npm@actions/http-client4.0.0indirect
npm@actions/io3.0.2indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color5.1.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/dom-selector7.0.4indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/nwsapi2.3.9indirect
npm@bramus/specificity2.4.2indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers6.0.2indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.1.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser4.0.2indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.2indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@exodus/bytes1.15.0indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui9.0.0indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@jsdevtools/npm-publish4.1.5indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core7.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint11.0.2indirect
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types27.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest14.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-request-log6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods17.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-throttling11.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/request10.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/request-error7.0.2indirect
npm@octokit/rest22.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/types16.0.0indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@puppeteer/browsers3.0.6indirect
npm@types/semver7.7.1indirect
npm@webref/css6.25.12indirect
npm@webref/css8.7.1indirect
npm@webref/elements2.7.2indirect
npm@webref/events1.24.3indirect
npm@webref/idl3.81.4indirect
npm@webref/xref1.2.8indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmarray-back6.2.2indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.2indirect
npmbefore-after-hook4.0.0indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmbottleneck2.19.5indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.2indirect
npmcddlparser0.6.0indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmchromium-bidi16.0.1indirect
npmcliui9.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommand-line-args6.0.1indirect
npmcommander15.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmdata-urls7.0.0indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmdevtools-protocol0.0.1638949indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex10.6.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmentities6.0.1indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmextend-shallow2.0.1indirect
npmfast-content-type-parse3.0.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.2indirect
npmfetch-filecache-for-crawling5.1.1indirect
npmfilename-reserved-regex2.0.0indirect
npmfilenamify4.3.0indirect
npmfilenamify-url2.1.2indirect
npmfind-replace5.0.2indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmglob13.0.4indirect
npmgray-matter4.0.3indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer6.0.0indirect
npmhumanize-url2.1.1indirect
npmis-extendable0.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjackspeak4.2.3indirect
npmjs-yaml3.14.2indirect
npmjsdom29.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.3indirect
npmlodash.camelcase4.3.0indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmlru-cache11.2.6indirect
npmlru-cache11.2.7indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmminimatch10.2.4indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmmodern-tar0.7.6indirect
npmnormalize-url4.5.1indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmparse58.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmpuppeteer25.3.0indirect
npmpuppeteer-core25.3.0indirect
npmreffy21.0.5indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrimraf5.0.9indirect
npmrimraf6.1.3indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmsection-matter1.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.3indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-bom-string1.0.0indirect
npmstrip-outer1.0.1indirect
npmstrudy3.2.5indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtar7.5.7indirect
npmtldts7.0.27indirect
npmtldts-core7.0.27indirect
npmtough-cookie6.0.1indirect
npmtr466.0.0indirect
npmtrim-repeated1.0.0indirect
npmtunnel0.0.6indirect
npmtyped-query-selector2.12.2indirect
npmtypical7.3.0indirect
npmundici6.27.0indirect
npmundici7.28.0indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.3indirect
npmvalidate-npm-package-name7.0.1indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmweb-specs4.6.0indirect
npmwebdriver-bidi-protocol0.4.2indirect
npmwebidl-conversions8.0.1indirect
npmwebidl224.5.0indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype5.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url16.0.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi9.0.2indirect
npmws8.21.1indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
npmyargs18.0.0indirect
npmyargs-parser22.0.0indirect
npmzod3.25.76indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.