Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 03:25 UTC

web-token / jwt-framework

JWT Framework

PHPMIT★ 954 stars⑂ 119 forkssince Oct 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

web-token/jwt-framework holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (54/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Web TokenOrganization
26 followers35 public repossince Sep 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistweb-token/jwt-framework4.2.3671,0631544 days agosymfonybundlejwtjwsjwejosejwajwkjwksetjotrfc7515rfc7516rfc7517rfc7518rfc7519rfc7520

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 112 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year112
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 96 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count96
latest_release_tag4.2.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases16.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.3/60Stars — 954 stars
17.3/25Forks — 119 forks
7.1/15Watchers — 20 watchers
Inputs used
forks119
stars954
watchers20
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
77.7/80Monthly downloads — 671,063 downloads/month across packagist
12.6/20Registry dependents — 76 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesweb-token/jwt-framework
dependents76
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads22,282,799
monthly_downloads671,063
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.955
How it's scored
41.3/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
23.8/30PR acceptance — 395/497 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs395
open_issues4
closed_issues235
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d35
prs_decided_30d38
issue_closed_ratio0.983
closed_unmerged_prs102
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.3/25Owner reach — 26 followers of web-token
23.3/25Track record — 35 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers26
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginweb-token
public_repos35
account_age_days3,282

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 154 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesweb-token/jwt-framework
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjose, jwt, jws, jwe, jwk, jwkset, php, json, encryption, signature
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.96
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/695 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes71,867
source_files_sampled695
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — sample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

954GitHub stars
27contributors
112commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
96releases
1bus factor
4open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 119 ⇿
0Stars
119Forks
81Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012011742018-012022-052026-08
Major 1Minor 7Patch 66

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 03:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbrick/math^0.12|^0.13|^0.14|^0.15|^0.16|^0.17|^0.18|^0.19|^0.20|^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/clock^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher^1.0composer.json
Packagistspomky-labs/pki-framework^1.2.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^7.0|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.0|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^7.0|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^2.5|^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^7.0|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts^3.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^7.0|^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 33

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 22 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbrick/math—direct
Packagistpsr/clock—direct
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher—direct
Packagistspomky-labs/pki-framework—direct
Packagistsymfony/config—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection—direct
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts—direct
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—direct
Packagistext-curl—indirect
Packagistext-gmp—indirect
Packagistext-openssl—indirect
Packagistext-sodium—indirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-config-test—indirect
Packagistparagonie/sodium_compat—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpbench/phpbench—indirect
Packagistroave/security-advisories—indirect
Packagistspomky-labs/aes-key-wrap—indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/cache—indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock—indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder—indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client—indirect
Packagistsymfony/serializer—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Packagistweb-token/jwt-library—indirect
Packagistweb-token/jwt-rsa15—indirect
Packagistweb-token/jwt-unsecured—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.