Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-03 14:53 UTC

webinertia / webware-core

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗

webinertia/webware-core holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WebinertiaOrganization · verified domain
5 followers52 public repossince Jan 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistwebware/webware-core1.0.0-alpha.82,14692 days agocorewebwaremezzio

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18Commit volume — 87 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year87
human_commit_share0.989
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 9 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tag1.0.0-alpha.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
44.4/80Monthly downloads — 2,146 downloads/month across packagist
4.7/20Registry dependents — 4 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageswebware/webware-core
dependents4
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads3,612
monthly_downloads2,146
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance — 45/48 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs45
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d8
prs_decided_7d9
prs_merged_30d31
prs_decided_30d34
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of webinertia
22/25Track record — 52 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginwebinertia
public_repos52
account_age_days1,724

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 9 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageswebware/webware-core
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages132
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 132 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 76 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.864
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,722
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 89
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 89 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.011
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes6,062
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
87commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-03 14:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistfig/http-message-util^1.1composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-inputfilter3.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-permissions-acl^2.16composer.json
Packagistmezzio/mezzio-authentication^1.13composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-message^2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-server-handler^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-server-middleware^1.0composer.json
All dependencies 134

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 127 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfig/http-message-util1.1.5direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-inputfilter 3.0-dev.0direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-permissions-acl2.18.0direct
Packagistmezzio/mezzio-authentication1.13.0direct
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0direct
Packagistpsr/http-server-handler1.0.2direct
Packagistpsr/http-server-middleware1.0.2direct
Packagistbeberlei/assert3.3.4indirect
Packagistbrick/varexporter0.6.0indirect
Packagistcolinodell/json53.0.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/ca-bundle1.5.14indirect
Packagistcomposer/class-map-generator1.7.3indirect
Packagistcomposer/composer2.10.3indirect
Packagistcomposer/metadata-minifier1.0.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/spdx-licenses1.6.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations2.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistinfection/abstract-testframework-adapter0.5.1indirect
Packagistinfection/extension-installer0.1.2indirect
Packagistinfection/include-interceptor1.0.0indirect
Packagistinfection/infection0.35.2indirect
Packagistinfection/mutator0.4.1indirect
Packagistjetbrains/phpstorm-stubs2026.2indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.12.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-diactoros3.8.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-filter 3.5-dev.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-servicemanager4.5.1indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-stdlib3.21.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-translator2.0.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-validator3.18.0indirect
Packagistmarc-mabe/php-enum4.7.2indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.14.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistnikolaposa/version4.2.1indirect
Packagistocramius/package-versions2.12.0indirect
Packagistondram/ci-detector4.2.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-db/phpdb 0.6-dev.0indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/async6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/channel6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/collection6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/comparison6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/date-time6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/default6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/dict6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/either-or-both6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/env6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/file6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/filesystem6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/foundation6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/interoperability6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/io6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/iter6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/json6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/locale6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/option6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/process6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/promise6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/range6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/regex6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/result6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/shell6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/str6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/type6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/vec6.2.1indirect
Packagistphpbench/container2.2.3indirect
Packagistphpbench/phpbench1.7.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage14.3.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator7.0.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker7.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer9.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit13.3.1indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.9indirect
Packagistroave/backward-compatibility-check8.21.0indirect
Packagistroave/better-reflection6.72.0indirect
Packagistroave/security-advisories—indirect
Packagistsanmai/di-container0.2indirect
Packagistsanmai/duoclock0.1.3indirect
Packagistsanmai/later0.1.8indirect
Packagistsanmai/pipeline7.10indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator8.4.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff9.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment9.3.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter8.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/file-filter1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/git-state1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state9.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code5.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator8.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context8.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/version7.0.0indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.12.1indirect
Packagistseld/phar-utils1.2.2indirect
Packagistseld/signal-handler2.0.2indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.18indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder8.1.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.42.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.1.2indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safe3.4.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.7.0indirect
Packagistwebware/webware-tools—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 132 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.