Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 02:50 UTC

wemake-services / django-modern-rest

Modern REST framework for Django with types and async support!

PythonMIT★ 1,456 stars⑂ 209 forkssince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginNetwork servicehow this is determined

wemake-services/django-modern-rest holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

wemake.servicesOrganization
397 followers54 public repossince May 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdjango-modern-rest0.15.013,329183 days agoapirestdjangodjango-plugindjango-apidjangorestframeworkwemake-python-package

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,172 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,172
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tag0.15.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases16.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.3/60Stars — 1,456 stars
19.3/25Forks — 209 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks209
stars1,456
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
55/80Monthly downloads — 13,329 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdjango-modern-rest
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads13,329
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.597
How it's scored
37.4/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
27.4/30PR acceptance — 1,092/1,194 decided PRs merged
3.8/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/17 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 20/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs1,092
open_issues34
closed_issues276
prs_merged_7d40
prs_decided_7d55
prs_merged_30d40
prs_decided_30d55
issue_closed_ratio0.89
closed_unmerged_prs102
first_time_authors_30d10
first_time_prs_merged_30d5
first_time_prs_decided_30d17
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.7/25Owner reach — 397 followers of wemake-services
24.7/25Track record — 54 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers397
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginwemake-services
public_repos54
account_age_days3,760

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 18 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdjango-modern-rest
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), setup.cfg ([flake8])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://django-modern-rest.rtfd.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi, django, django-ninja, django-rest-api, django-rest-framework, rest, rest-api, restful-api
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://django-modern-rest.rtfd.io
docs_sitehttps://django-modern-rest.rtfd.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 20/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.9
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier40
security_posture_before_jurisdiction79
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages4
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:django-modern-rest@0.15.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 4 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://django-modern-rest.rtfd.io/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 85 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://django-modern-rest.rtfd.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.955
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — benchmarks/justfile, docs/justfile, justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), setup.cfg ([flake8])
11/11Static type checking — django_test_app/mypy.ini, dmr/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesbenchmarks/justfile, docs/justfile, justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdjango_test_app/mypy.ini, dmr/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.1
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (django_test_app/mypy.ini, dmr/py.typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 6/814 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes3,954,672
source_files_sampled814
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — docs/examples/external_views/openapi.yml
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdocs/examples/external_views/openapi.yml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1,456GitHub stars
97contributors
1,172commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
34open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 24 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 209 ⇿
0Stars
209Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04080120160200240209112025-102026-032026-09
Major 0Minor 15Patch 1
OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 02:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 20/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIdjango>=5,<6.2pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.12pyproject.toml
All dependencies 198

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 196 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdjango5.2.17direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIasgiref3.12.1indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.11.2indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbashlex0.18indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIbracex3.0.1indirect
PyPIbuild1.6.1indirect
PyPIcattrs26.2.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIcibuildwheel4.2.1indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcovdefaults2.3.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.1indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.1indirect
PyPIdennis1.3.0indirect
PyPIdependency-groups1.3.2indirect
PyPIdirty-equals0.11indirect
PyPIdjango-allauth65.19.3indirect
PyPIdjango-csp4.0indirect
PyPIdjango-filter26.1indirect
PyPIdjango-mantle26.6indirect
PyPIdjango-modern-rest0.15.0indirect
PyPIdjango-modern-schemas0.1.1indirect
PyPIdjango-ninja—indirect
PyPIdjango-ninja1.7.0indirect
PyPIdjango-readers2.5.1indirect
PyPIdjango-stubs6.1.0indirect
PyPIdjango-stubs-ext6.1.0indirect
PyPIdjangorestframework—indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocker7.2.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfaker40.38.0indirect
PyPIfastapi—indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.6indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIfreezegun1.5.5indirect
PyPIgraphql-core3.2.12indirect
PyPIgrimp3.17indirect
PyPIgunicorn—indirect
PyPIgunicorn26.2.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIharfile0.5.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhumanize4.16.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.168.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis-graphql0.13.2indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.1indirect
PyPIimport-linter2.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinline-snapshot0.35.4indirect
PyPIisort9.0.1indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-path0.5.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-rs0.55.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlazy-object-proxy1.12.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImcp2.2.0indirect
PyPImcp-types2.2.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImsgspec0.21.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInanodjango0.16.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-schema-validator0.9.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-spec-validator0.9.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.12.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathable0.6.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIphonenumbers9.0.39indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.8indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpolib1.2.0indirect
PyPIpolyfactory3.3.0indirect
PyPIpunq0.9.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-extra-types2.11.1indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpygments-styles0.3.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.14.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpypyp1.3.0indirect
PyPIpyrate-limiter4.5.0indirect
PyPIpyrefly1.3.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.414indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-codspeed5.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-django4.14.0indirect
PyPIpytest-freezer0.4.9indirect
PyPIpytest-randomly5.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpywhatwgurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIredis8.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.16.7indirect
PyPIschemathesis4.26.1indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIshibuya2026.7.12indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIslotscheck0.21.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.13.6indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-contributors0.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-iconify0.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-llms-txt0.7.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid2.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.6.0indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.11indirect
PyPIstarlette1.6.0indirect
PyPIsyrupy6.1.1indirect
PyPItabulate—indirect
PyPItestcontainers4.15.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItracecov0.24.2indirect
PyPItracecov-community0.24.2indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPIty0.0.78indirect
PyPItyper0.27.2indirect
PyPItypes-cffi2.1.0.20260827indirect
PyPItypes-django-filter26.1.0.20260906indirect
PyPItypes-docker7.2.0.20260827indirect
PyPItypes-docutils0.23.0.20260911indirect
PyPItypes-pyopenssl24.1.0.20240722indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260906indirect
PyPItypes-redis4.6.0.20241004indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260906indirect
PyPItypes-setuptools84.0.0.20260812indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.4indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn—indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4indirect
PyPIwemake-python-styleguide1.8.1indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8indirect
PyPIwhitenoise6.12.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.4.1indirect
PyPIxmltodict-rs0.13.9indirect
PyPIzapros0.17.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:django-modern-rest@0.15.0 pulls in 4 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.