Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 19:57 UTC

wherewhere / DotnetEx

Set of polyfills for ord .NET Framework.

C#MIT★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2022View on GitHub ↗

wherewhere/DotnetEx holds a health index of 33 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Security (44/100) and lowest on Vitality (27/100). It was last updated 222 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

33
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

33
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 38 is calibrated to 33 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

where wherePersonal account
273 followers79 public repossince Apr 2017@Paving-Base

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetPolyfill.System.Buffers.NET350.1.5-6314 days ago
NuGetPolyfill.System.Buffers.NET400.1.5-5314 days ago
NuGetPolyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET350.1.5-6314 days ago
NuGetPolyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET400.1.5-5314 days ago
NuGetmscorlib.Polyfill.NET350.1.5-6314 days ago
NuGetmscorlib.Polyfill.NET400.1.5-5314 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

27At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 222 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume — 4 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push222
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 6 version tags (no GitHub releases)
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 314 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~259.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv0.1.5
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release314
mean_days_between_releases259.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.2/80Total downloads — 27,991 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesPolyfill.System.Buffers.NET35, Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET40, Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35, Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET40, mscorlib.Polyfill.NET35, mscorlib.Polyfill.NET40
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads27,991
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

41Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.5/25Owner reach — 273 followers of wherewhere
25/25Track record — 79 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers273
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginwherewhere
public_repos79
account_age_days3,473
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 6 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 314 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesPolyfill.System.Buffers.NET35, Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET40, Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35, Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET40, mscorlib.Polyfill.NET35, mscorlib.Polyfill.NET40
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish314

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspolyfill, dotnet
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 10 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.4/40Legible commit history — 1 of 22 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.045
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/System.Buffers.NET35/Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET35.csproj, src/System.Buffers.NET40/Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET40.csproj, src/System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35/Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 22
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/System.Buffers.NET35/Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET35.csproj, src/System.Buffers.NET40/Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET40.csproj, src/System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35/Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35.csproj, src/System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET40/Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET40.csproj, src/mscorlib.NET35/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET35.csproj, src/mscorlib.NET40/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET40.csproj, tests/DotnetEx.Test.NET35/DotnetEx.Test.NET35.csproj, tests/DotnetEx.Test.NET40/DotnetEx.Test.NET40.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/101 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes46,413
source_files_sampled101
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
1contributors
4commits, last 12 months
222days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10
3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 19:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1src/System.Buffers.NET35/Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET35.csproj
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1src/System.Buffers.NET40/Polyfill.System.Buffers.NET40.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0src/System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35/Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET35.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0src/System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET40/Polyfill.System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation.NET40.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/mscorlib.NET35/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET35.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe5.0.0src/mscorlib.NET35/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET35.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode6.0.0src/mscorlib.NET35/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET35.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memory10.0.4src/mscorlib.NET35/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET35.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/mscorlib.NET40/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET40.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe5.0.0src/mscorlib.NET40/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET40.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode6.0.0src/mscorlib.NET40/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET40.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memory10.0.4src/mscorlib.NET40/mscorlib.Polyfill.NET40.csproj
All dependencies 10

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode6.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memory10.0.4direct
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0direct
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1direct
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe5.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.14.0indirect
NuGetNUnit3.11.0indirect
NuGetNUnit3.14.0indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter3.17.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 10 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.