Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-07 22:49 UTC

wiktor-k / service-binding

Automates parsing and binding to TCP and Unix sockets

Rust · JustCustom license★ 7 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2022View on GitHub ↗

wiktor-k/service-binding holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Security (66/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Wiktor KwapisiewiczPersonal account
130 followers221 public repossince May 2012@MetacodeBiz

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioservice-binding3.0.138,773120 days agobindingsystemdunixsocketslistenfdparsing

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 11 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~179.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv3.0.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases179.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars7
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
61.2/80Monthly downloads — 38,773 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesservice-binding
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads197,430
monthly_downloads38,773
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.992
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.4/30PR acceptance — 35/43 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs35
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.2/25Owner reach — 130 followers of wiktor-k
25/25Track record — 221 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers130
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginwiktor-k
public_repos221
account_age_days5,265
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesservice-binding
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://crates.io/crates/service-binding
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, sockets, systemd
has_wikino
homepagehttps://crates.io/crates/service-binding
docs_sitehttps://crates.io/crates/service-binding
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages137
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 137 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.docker.com/llms.txt)
20.3/40Legible commit history — 38 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.docker.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.38
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — .justfile
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files.justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/2 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes15,773
source_files_sampled2
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

7GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index crates:service-binding@3.0.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-07 22:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests1 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 3/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 137

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 137 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioactix-codec0.5.4indirect
crates.ioactix-http3.18.12indirect
crates.ioactix-macros0.2.5indirect
crates.ioactix-router0.5.4indirect
crates.ioactix-rt2.15.0indirect
crates.ioactix-server2.9.8indirect
crates.ioactix-service2.0.3indirect
crates.ioactix-utils3.0.2indirect
crates.ioactix-web4.15.0indirect
crates.ioactix-web-codegen4.4.0indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.2indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iobytestring1.5.1indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.5indirect
crates.ioclap4.6.7indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.7indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.7indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.1indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.ioconvert_case0.10.0indirect
crates.iocore_detect1.0.0indirect
crates.ioderanged0.5.8indirect
crates.ioderive_more2.1.1indirect
crates.ioderive_more-impl2.1.1indirect
crates.iodisplaydoc0.2.7indirect
crates.ioencoding_rs0.8.42indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.5.0indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.2indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.34indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohttp0.2.12indirect
crates.iohttparse1.10.1indirect
crates.iohttpdate1.0.3indirect
crates.ioicu_collections2.3.0indirect
crates.ioicu_locale_core2.3.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer2.3.0indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer_data2.3.0indirect
crates.ioicu_properties2.3.0indirect
crates.ioicu_properties_data2.3.0indirect
crates.ioicu_provider2.3.1indirect
crates.ioidna1.1.0indirect
crates.ioidna_adapter1.2.2indirect
crates.ioimpl-more0.3.8indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iolanguage-tags0.3.2indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.190indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolitemap0.8.3indirect
crates.iolocal-waker0.1.4indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iolog0.4.34indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.iomime0.3.17indirect
crates.iomio1.2.4indirect
crates.iomultiversion_no_op1.0.0indirect
crates.ionum-conv0.2.2indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.2indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopotential_utf0.1.6indirect
crates.iopowerfmt0.2.1indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.ioraunch1.0.1indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex-lite0.1.9indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.5indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.23indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151indirect
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7.1indirect
crates.ioserial_test4.0.1indirect
crates.ioserial_test_derive4.0.1indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-registry1.4.8indirect
crates.iosimdutf80.1.5indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.16.2indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.5indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.6indirect
crates.iosynstructure0.14.0indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotestresult0.4.2indirect
crates.iotime0.3.55indirect
crates.iotime-core0.1.9indirect
crates.iotime-macros0.2.32indirect
crates.iotinystr0.8.4indirect
crates.iotokio1.53.2indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.2indirect
crates.iotokio-util0.7.19indirect
crates.iotracing0.1.44indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.26indirect
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.iourl2.5.8indirect
crates.ioutf8_iter1.0.4indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowriteable0.6.4indirect
crates.ioyoke0.8.3indirect
crates.ioyoke-derive0.8.4indirect
crates.iozerofrom0.1.8indirect
crates.iozerofrom-derive0.1.8indirect
crates.iozerotrie0.2.5indirect
crates.iozerovec0.11.8indirect
crates.iozerovec-derive0.11.6indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 137 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.