Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 11:17 UTC

wrightkit / workshop-rs

Rust library and CLI for Overwatch Workshop code: parse, validate, convert, and emit.

RustMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2026View on GitHub ↗

wrightkit/workshop-rs holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WrightKitOrganization · verified domain
0 followers11 public repossince Aug 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.ioworkshop-rs1.18.02,326920 days ago
crates.ioworkshop-rs-cli1.18.0588920 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 415 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year415
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 91 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count91
latest_release_tagv1.18.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.2/80Monthly downloads — 2,914 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesworkshop-rs, workshop-rs-cli
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads8,742
monthly_downloads2,914
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 51% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.511
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
29.1/30PR acceptance — 310/320 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 25/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs310
open_issues10
closed_issues164
prs_merged_7d41
prs_decided_7d42
prs_merged_30d58
prs_decided_30d59
issue_closed_ratio0.943
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of wrightkit
8.2/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginwrightkit
public_repos11
account_age_days68

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 92 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesworkshop-rs, workshop-rs-cli
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

83Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 20 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/workshop-rs
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsoverwatch, overwatch-workshop
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/workshop-rs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 20 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 25/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages112
unassessed_packages4
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 112 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,313
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 3/140 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes113,215
source_files_sampled140
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
415commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
91releases
1bus factor
10open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index crates:workshop-rs@1.18.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 11:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests20 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 25/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioworkshop-rs1.18.0crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—crates/workshop-rs-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaho-corasick1crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-ident—crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-normalization—crates/workshop-rs/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 116

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 108 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaho-corasick—direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5direct
crates.ioserde1.0.229direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151direct
crates.iosha20.10.9direct
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.26direct
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1.25direct
crates.ioworkshop-rs—direct
crates.ioahash0.8.12indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.104indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobit-set0.5.3indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.6.3indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.2indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iobytecount0.6.9indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.7indirect
crates.ioderanged0.5.8indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.iodisplaydoc0.2.7indirect
crates.iofancy-regex0.13.0indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.2indirect
crates.iofraction0.15.4indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.34indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.ioicu_collections2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_locale_core2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer_data2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_properties2.1.2indirect
crates.ioicu_properties_data2.1.2indirect
crates.ioicu_provider2.1.1indirect
crates.ioidna1.1.0indirect
crates.ioidna_adapter1.2.1indirect
crates.ioiso86010.6.6indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.106indirect
crates.iojsonschema—indirect
crates.iojsonschema0.18.3indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.1indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolitemap0.8.3indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionom8.0.0indirect
crates.ionum0.4.3indirect
crates.ionum-bigint0.4.8indirect
crates.ionum-cmp0.1.0indirect
crates.ionum-complex0.4.6indirect
crates.ionum-conv0.1.0indirect
crates.ionum-integer0.1.47indirect
crates.ionum-iter0.1.46indirect
crates.ionum-rational0.4.2indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.2indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopotential_utf0.1.6indirect
crates.iopowerfmt0.2.1indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex—indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.16.3indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.3indirect
crates.iosynstructure0.14.0indirect
crates.iotime0.3.45indirect
crates.iotime-core0.1.7indirect
crates.iotime-macros0.2.25indirect
crates.iotinystr0.8.4indirect
crates.iotinyvec1.13.3indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.iourl2.5.8indirect
crates.ioutf8_iter1.0.4indirect
crates.iouuid1.26.1indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.1+wasi-0.2.4indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.129indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.129indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.129indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.129indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.46.0indirect
crates.iowriteable0.6.4indirect
crates.ioyoke0.8.3indirect
crates.ioyoke-derive0.8.4indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.62indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.62indirect
crates.iozerofrom0.1.8indirect
crates.iozerofrom-derive0.1.8indirect
crates.iozerotrie0.2.5indirect
crates.iozerovec0.11.8indirect
crates.iozerovec-derive0.11.6indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 112 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
time0.3.45indirectmoderate20.3.47

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.