Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 20:03 UTC

x-govuk / govuk-frontend-aspnetcore

ASP.NET Core integration for the GOV.UK Design system.

C#MIT★ 43 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

x-govuk/govuk-frontend-aspnetcore holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (56/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

X-GOVUKOrganization
111 followers40 public repossince Jan 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetGovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore4.4.0-4745 days agoaspnetcoretaghelpersgdsgov.ukx-govuk

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 359 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year359
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year36

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 61 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 45 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~21.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count61
latest_release_tagv4.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release45
mean_days_between_releases21.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.3/60Stars — 43 stars
9/25Forks — 13 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars43
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
58.1/80Total downloads — 387,187 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesGovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads387,187
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.995
How it's scored
40.2/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance — 419/445 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs419
open_issues5
closed_issues112
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d39
prs_decided_30d40
issue_closed_ratio0.957
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14.7/25Owner reach — 111 followers of x-govuk
23.7/25Track record — 40 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers111
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginx-govuk
public_repos40
account_age_days2,428

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 45 days ago
20/20Version history — 47 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesGovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish45

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsasp-net-core, gds, govuk, x-govuk
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages21
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 21 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 81 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile, mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 78 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile, mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.78
toolchain_manifestssamples/Samples.DateInput/Samples.DateInput.csproj, samples/Samples.MvcStarter/Samples.MvcStarter.csproj, samples/Samples.Sass/Samples.Sass.csproj, src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs.csproj, src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.csproj, tests/GovUk.FrontEnd.AspNetCore.TestCommon/GovUk.FrontEnd.AspNetCore.TestCommon.csproj, tests/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.IntegrationTests/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.IntegrationTests.csproj, tests/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.PackageTests/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.PackageTests.csproj, tests/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Tests/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/640 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes68,717
source_files_sampled640
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

43GitHub stars
5contributors
359commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
61releases
1bus factor
5open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
39Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012020-062022-122025-06
Major 3Minor 15Patch 15

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 20:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetFluid.Core2.24.0src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs.csproj
NuGetPuppeteerSharp20.1.3src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs.csproj
NuGetSoftCircuits.HtmlMonkey3.1.0src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.Docs.csproj
NuGetAspNetCore.SassCompiler1.99.0src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers4.14.0src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Threading.Analyzers17.13.61src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.csproj
NuGetMinVer2.3.1src/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore/GovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 13 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAspNetCore.SassCompiler1.101.0direct
NuGetAspNetCore.SassCompiler1.99.0direct
NuGetFluid.Core2.24.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers4.14.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Threading.Analyzers17.13.61direct
NuGetMinVer2.3.1direct
NuGetPuppeteerSharp20.1.3direct
NuGetSoftCircuits.HtmlMonkey3.1.0direct
NuGetAngleSharp1.5.2indirect
NuGetAngleSharp1.8.0indirect
NuGetAngleSharp.Diffing1.1.1indirect
NuGetGovUk.Frontend.AspNetCore—indirect
NuGetJoonasw.AspNetCore.SecurityHeaders4.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost8.0.27indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost9.0.16indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Playwright1.21.0indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetNodaTime3.0.5indirect
NuGetxunit.v34.0.0indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.assert4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 21 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.