Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-10 13:17 UTC

xLongLink / longlink

Code-first platform for building and operating dedicated solutions.

Python · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 28 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined
#python#fastapi#platform#business-applications#developer-tools#internal-tools#workflow-automation

xLongLink/longlink holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (57/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LongLinkOrganization
3 followers4 public repossince Jan 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIlonglink0.7.23,0551070 days agolonglinksdkfastapisqlalchemypydanticalembic

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

89Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 4,161 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year4,161
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year36

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 61 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count61
latest_release_tagv0.7.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

26At Risk
How it's scored
23.2/60Stars — 28 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars28
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.5/80Monthly downloads — 3,055 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageslonglink
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,055
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.999

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good
How it's scored
35.1/42Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
28.9/30PR acceptance — 1,169/1,215 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,169
open_issues17
closed_issues86
prs_merged_7d57
prs_decided_7d58
prs_merged_30d57
prs_decided_30d58
issue_closed_ratio0.835
closed_unmerged_prs46
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of xLongLink
14.6/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginxLongLink
public_repos4
account_age_days1,735

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 107 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslonglink
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — api/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), sdk/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://longlink.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, fastapi, platform, business-applications, developer-tools, internal-tools, workflow-automation
has_wikino
homepagehttps://longlink.dev
docs_sitehttps://longlink.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

72Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories9
affected_packages4
assessed_packages201
unassessed_packages30
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 201 resolved dependencies against OSV. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, sdk/longlink/.static/new/AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, sdk/longlink/.static/new/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,022

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

86Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — api/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), sdk/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — sdk/longlink/.static/new/jsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssdk/longlink/.static/new/jsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (sdk/longlink/.static/new/jsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/473 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes53,124
source_files_sampled473
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

28GitHub stars
4contributors
4,161commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
61releases
1bus factor
17open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'longlink-api' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:longlink@0.7.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
30Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

222333322026-072026-082026-09
Major 0Minor 2Patch 28
OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-10 13:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiobotocore>=2.25.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiomysql>=0.3.2api/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosmtplib>=5.1.2api/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.22.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIalembic>=1.19.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncpg>=0.31.0api/pyproject.toml
PyPIbotocore>=1.40.61api/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.141.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx2>=2.9.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.13.4api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.15.0api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.3api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpwdlib>=0.3.0,<1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt>=2.10.1,<3api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-slugify>=8.0.4api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg>=3.3.4api/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0.51api/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy-utils>=0.42.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlmodel>=0.0.45api/pyproject.toml
PyPIkr8s>=0.20.15api/pyproject.toml
PyPIlonglink—api/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.52.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPImjml>=0.12.0api/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiobotocore>=2.25.1sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.22.1sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIalembic>=1.19.1sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.14.2sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncpg>=0.31.0sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIemail-validator>=2.3.0sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.141.1sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastmcp>=4.0.11,<5sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIfsspec>=2026.4.0sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx2>=2.9.1sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.13.4sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.15.0sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt>=2.10.1,<3sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIs3fs>=2026.4.0sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0.51sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlmodel>=0.0.45sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.3.1sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.27.2sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.52.1sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIwatchfiles>=0.20sdk/pyproject.toml
npm@astryxdesign/core0.6.5web/package.json
npm@dicebear/core^10.7.0web/package.json
npm@dicebear/styles^10.6.0web/package.json
npm@fontsource/kalam^5.3.0web/package.json
npm@hookform/resolvers^5.9.1web/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.3web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.102.8web/package.json
npmes-toolkit^1.52.0web/package.json
npmisbot^5web/package.json
npmky^2.1.0web/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.48.0web/package.json
npmreact^19.3.0web/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.3.0web/package.json
npmreact-error-boundary^6.1.6web/package.json
npmreact-hook-form^7.89.0web/package.json
npmreact-router8.3.1web/package.json
npmsucrase^3.35.1web/package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3web/package.json
npmzod^4.6.5web/package.json
All dependencies 231

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 72 direct and 159 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@astryxdesign/core0.6.5direct
npm@dicebear/core^10.7.0direct
npm@dicebear/styles^10.6.0direct
npm@fontsource/kalam^5.3.0direct
npm@hookform/resolvers^5.9.1direct
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.3direct
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.102.8direct
npmes-toolkit^1.52.0direct
npmisbot^5direct
npmky^2.1.0direct
npmlucide-react^1.48.0direct
npmreact^19.3.0direct
npmreact-dom^19.3.0direct
npmreact-error-boundary^6.1.6direct
npmreact-hook-form^7.89.0direct
npmreact-router8.3.1direct
npmsucrase^3.35.1direct
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3direct
npmzod^4.6.5direct
PyPIaiobotocore2.25.1direct
PyPIaiobotocore3.8.0direct
PyPIaiobotocore3.9.0direct
PyPIaiomysql0.3.2direct
PyPIaiosmtplib5.1.3direct
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1direct
PyPIalembic—direct
PyPIalembic1.18.5direct
PyPIalembic1.19.1direct
PyPIalembic1.20.0direct
PyPIanyio4.14.2direct
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0direct
PyPIbotocore1.40.61direct
PyPIbotocore1.43.46direct
PyPIbotocore1.43.56direct
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0direct
PyPIfastapi—direct
PyPIfastapi0.141.1direct
PyPIfastmcp4.0.11direct
PyPIfastmcp4.1.0direct
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0direct
PyPIfsspec2026.7.0direct
PyPIhttpx22.12.0direct
PyPIhttpx22.13.1direct
PyPIkr8s0.20.15direct
PyPIlonglink—direct
PyPIlonglink0.2.7direct
PyPImjml0.12.0direct
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4direct
PyPIpwdlib0.3.0direct
PyPIpydantic—direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0direct
PyPIpyjwt2.15.0direct
PyPIpython-slugify9.1.2direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIs3fs2026.6.0direct
PyPIs3fs2026.7.0direct
PyPIsqlalchemy—direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.52direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.54direct
PyPIsqlalchemy-utils0.42.1direct
PyPIsqlmodel—direct
PyPIsqlmodel0.0.39direct
PyPIsqlmodel0.0.47direct
PyPIstarlette1.3.1direct
PyPIstarlette1.6.0direct
PyPItyper0.27.2direct
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4direct
PyPIuvicorn0.54.0direct
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0direct
npm@astryxdesign/cli0.6.5indirect
npm@hey-api/openapi-ts0.99.0indirect
npm@oxlint/plugins1.81.0indirect
npm@react-router/dev8.4.0indirect
npm@testing-library/user-event14.6.7indirect
npm@types/node^26.6.4indirect
npm@types/react^19.3.0indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.3.0indirect
npm@voidzero-dev/vite-plus-core0.3.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-perfectionist^5.12.1indirect
npmhappy-dom^20.14.5indirect
npmprettier^3.9.9indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmvite-plus0.3.1indirect
npmvitest5.0.1indirect
PyPIaiofile3.12.3indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaioitertools0.13.0indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings25.1.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.8.0indirect
PyPIbeartype0.22.9indirect
PyPIbeartype0.23.0rc2indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.6indirect
PyPIcachetools7.2.1indirect
PyPIcaio0.12.9indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.1indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.2indirect
PyPIcyclopts5.2.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocker7.2.0indirect
PyPIdocopt-ng0.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIdotmap1.3.30indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfastmcp-slim4.0.11indirect
PyPIfastmcp-slim4.1.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.3indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.4indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.5indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.3.2indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.13.1indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-ws0.9.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.5indirect
PyPIjsonref1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-path0.5.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlonglink-app0.0.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.2indirect
PyPImako1.3.12indirect
PyPImako1.4.1indirect
PyPImako1.4.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImcp2.3.0indirect
PyPImcp-types2.3.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.9.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-pydantic0.6.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.45.1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathable0.6.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.12.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpy-key-value-aio0.4.6indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.1indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpymysql1.2.0indirect
PyPIpyperclip1.11.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.411indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-box7.4.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-jsonpath2.2.1indirect
PyPIpython-multipart—indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrich-rst2.2.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.9.1indirect
PyPIruff0.16.4indirect
PyPIruff0.16.9indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.5.0indirect
PyPItenant0.0.0indirect
PyPItestcontainers4.15.0indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPIty0.0.84indirect
PyPItypes-aiobotocore-s33.9.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIuncalled-for0.4.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets17.2indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIwrapt2.3.0indirect
PyPIwsproto1.3.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 201 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
urllib32.7.0indirecthigh62.8.0
mako1.3.12indirectmoderate11.4.2
mako1.4.1indirectmoderate11.4.2
multidict6.7.1indirectmoderate16.9.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with xLongLink/longlink. Read them side by side →

99pydantic/logfireAI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.Exceptional98polarsource/polarPolar — A billing platform for the intelligence eraExceptional100streamlit/streamlitStreamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.Exceptional99awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99apache/supersetApache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration PlatformExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.