Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 23:25 UTC

xinix00 / HopOS

A bare-metal Go operating system for edge computing. No Linux — one static Go binary is the OS: apps run natively on their own CPU core in their own hardware-enforced memory partition.

RustMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

xinix00/HopOS holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Derek den HaasPersonal account
0 followers17 public repossince Feb 2013Haas Software B.V.

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iofwpoints to another repo — not scored2.21.0118111509 days agoautomationclideveloper-toolsproductivityworkspacecommand-line-utilities
crates.ioabipoints to another repo — not scored0.1.439463 days ago—
crates.iocpupoints to another repo — not scored0.2.0792171 days ago—
crates.iodevpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.05784007 days ago—
crates.ionetpoints to another repo — not scored0.0.2473855 days ago—
crates.ioheappoints to another repo — not scored0.1.025413506 days ago—
crates.iokernpoints to another repo — not scored1.8.326644582 days ago—
crates.iosync0.1.05622997 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 650 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year650
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 13 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.0.13
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases0.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

25At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of xinix00
21.1/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginxinix00
public_repos17
account_age_days4,984
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 2,997 days ago
12/20Version history — 2 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessync
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2,997

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), abi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), applib/Cargo.toml ([lints]), appspike/Cargo.toml ([lints]), blkdev/Cargo.toml ([lints]), board/Cargo.toml ([lints]), bounded/Cargo.toml ([lints]), cpu/Cargo.toml ([lints]), dev/Cargo.toml ([lints]), executor/Cargo.toml ([lints]), fw/Cargo.toml ([lints]), heap/Cargo.toml ([lints]), hopos/Cargo.toml ([lints]), kern/Cargo.toml ([lints]), net/Cargo.toml ([lints]), netdev/Cargo.toml ([lints]), sync/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/sync
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/sync
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 20 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate2.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories33
affected_packages11
assessed_packages105
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, moderate 1, low 2, unknown 7
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 105 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.3/40Legible commit history — 68 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.68
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, abi/Cargo.toml, applib/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), abi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), applib/Cargo.toml ([lints]), appspike/Cargo.toml ([lints]), blkdev/Cargo.toml ([lints]), board/Cargo.toml ([lints]), bounded/Cargo.toml ([lints]), cpu/Cargo.toml ([lints]), dev/Cargo.toml ([lints]), executor/Cargo.toml ([lints]), fw/Cargo.toml ([lints]), heap/Cargo.toml ([lints]), hopos/Cargo.toml ([lints]), kern/Cargo.toml ([lints]), net/Cargo.toml ([lints]), netdev/Cargo.toml ([lints]), sync/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, go.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, abi/Cargo.toml, applib/Cargo.toml, apps/bench/Cargo.toml, apps/cloudflared-lean/Cargo.toml, apps/decode/Cargo.toml, apps/display/Cargo.toml, apps/syncprobe/Cargo.toml, apps/vitals/Cargo.toml, apps/welcome/Cargo.toml, appspike/Cargo.toml, blkdev/Cargo.toml, board/Cargo.toml, board/altra/Cargo.toml, board/apple/Cargo.toml, board/licheerv/Cargo.toml, board/o6n/Cargo.toml, board/qemuvirt-riscv/Cargo.toml, board/qemuvirt/Cargo.toml, board/raspi/Cargo.toml, board/rk3566/Cargo.toml, board/rpi4/Cargo.toml, board/rpi5/Cargo.toml, board/uefi/Cargo.toml, bounded/Cargo.toml, cpu/Cargo.toml, dev/Cargo.toml, driver/aic/Cargo.toml, driver/brcmpcie/Cargo.toml, driver/codec/Cargo.toml, driver/dvfs/Cargo.toml, driver/dwwdt/Cargo.toml, driver/fb/Cargo.toml, driver/gicv2/Cargo.toml, driver/gicv3/Cargo.toml, driver/nic/gem/Cargo.toml, driver/nic/genet/Cargo.toml, driver/nic/igb/Cargo.toml, driver/nic/mdio/Cargo.toml, driver/nic/rtl8126/Cargo.toml, driver/nic/stmmac/Cargo.toml, driver/nic/tg3/Cargo.toml, driver/ns16550/Cargo.toml, driver/nvme/Cargo.toml, driver/pcie/Cargo.toml, driver/pl011/Cargo.toml, driver/rkrng/Cargo.toml, driver/rng200/Cargo.toml, driver/rtkit/Cargo.toml, driver/scmi/Cargo.toml, driver/smc/Cargo.toml, driver/smpro/Cargo.toml, driver/usb/dwc3/Cargo.toml, driver/usb/hid/Cargo.toml, driver/usb/xhci/Cargo.toml, driver/vcmail/Cargo.toml, driver/virtioblk/Cargo.toml, driver/virtionet/Cargo.toml, driver/virtiopci/Cargo.toml, executor/Cargo.toml, fw/Cargo.toml, go/cloudflared/go.mod, gui/fbgrant/Cargo.toml, gui/rkscan/Cargo.toml, gui/usbin/Cargo.toml, heap/Cargo.toml, hopos/Cargo.toml, kern/Cargo.toml, media/mve/Cargo.toml, media/optical/Cargo.toml, net/Cargo.toml, netdev/Cargo.toml, sync/Cargo.toml, tools/loc/Cargo.toml, tools/mkcard/Cargo.toml, tools/netmeter/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 6/440 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes132,023
source_files_sampled440
oversized_source_files6

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
650commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • crates package 'fw' points at a different repository (https://github.com/brocode/fw); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'abi' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ukuq/abi-rs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'cpu' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ax-x2/cpu); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'dev' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jmesmon/rust-dev); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'net' points at a different repository (https://github.com/async-net/net); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'heap' points at a different repository (https://github.com/strake/heap.rs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'kern' points at a different repository (https://ltheinrich.de/kern); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.1 / 10
2.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 23:25 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities20 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 87
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iodev—abi/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioleancrypto—abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheap—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioabi—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioexecutor—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.ionetdev—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioleannet—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-codec—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioleanhttp—applib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioapplib—appspike/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—appspike/Cargo.toml
crates.ionetdev—appspike/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—blkdev/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheap—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—board/Cargo.toml
crates.ioabi—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iocpu—board/Cargo.toml
crates.ionetdev—board/Cargo.toml
crates.ioexecutor—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-fb—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—board/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblkdev—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iofw—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-dvfs—board/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—cpu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioabi—cpu/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—cpu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioexecutor—cpu/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—cpu/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—executor/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—executor/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—fw/Cargo.toml
crates.ioabi—fw/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—fw/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioexecutor—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iocpu—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioabi—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ionetdev—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ionet—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iokern—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblkdev—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iofw—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioleannet—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioleandhcp—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-qemuvirt—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-rpi4—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-rpi5—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-rk3566—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-uefi—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-o6n—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-altra—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-qemuvirt-riscv—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-licheerv—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioboard-apple—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-fb—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iogui-fbgrant—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iogui-usbin—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-xhci—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-hid—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-dwc3—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-codec—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iomedia-mve—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iomedia-optical—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—hopos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblkdev—kern/Cargo.toml
crates.ioabi—kern/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—kern/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—kern/Cargo.toml
crates.iofw—kern/Cargo.toml
crates.ioleanelf—kern/Cargo.toml
crates.iodriver-codec—kern/Cargo.toml
crates.iodev—net/Cargo.toml
crates.ioabi—net/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—net/Cargo.toml
crates.ioexecutor—net/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—net/Cargo.toml
crates.ionetdev—net/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync—netdev/Cargo.toml
crates.iobounded—sync/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 105

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 100 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioleancrypto3.1.12direct
crates.ioleandhcp3.1.12direct
crates.ioleanelf3.1.12direct
crates.ioleanhttp3.1.12direct
crates.ioleannet3.1.12direct
crates.ioleanh23.1.12indirect
crates.ioleanhttps3.1.12indirect
crates.ioleanrand3.1.12indirect
crates.ioleantls3.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.4.1-0.20240526193622-a339e1f7089cindirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonic/loaderv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/backoffv0.0.0-20240920015135-e46b80a3a7d0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/base64xv0.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3v3.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22v22.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/facebookgo/gracev0.0.0-20180706040059-75cf19382434indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.15indirect
Gogithub.com/getsentry/sentry-gov0.43.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-chi/corsv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.2.6indirect
Gogithub.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3v3.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/httpheadv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/poolv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/wsv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gopacketv1.1.19indirect
Gogithub.com/google/pprofv0.0.0-20250418163039-24c5476c6587indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.28.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9statsv0.0.0-20211012122336-39d0f177ccd0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-sqlite3v0.35.4indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-sqlite3-wasm/v5v5.0.35304indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/juliandayv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.23.4indirect
Gogithub.com/philhofer/fwdv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstatv0.0.0-20240221224432-82ca36839d55indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.64.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.3indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asmv0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/usbarmory/tamagov1.26.4indirect
Gogithub.com/xinix00/hopv1.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/xinix00/hoplockv0.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/xinix00/hoplockserverv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/xinix00/hopos/metal/v2v2.2.8indirect
Gogithub.com/xinix00/leanv0.99.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xinix00/leanv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xinix00/leanv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagatorsv0.22.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.10.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/automaxprocsv1.6.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/mockv0.5.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto/x509roots/fallbackv0.0.0-20260709184058-243e02a382f8indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260226221140-a57be14db171indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260226221140-a57be14db171indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.81.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gonhooyr.io/websocketv1.8.7indirect
Gozombiezen.com/go/capnproto2v2.18.0+incompatibleindirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 105 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.81.1indirectcritical81.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.0indirectmoderate21.5.3
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.43.0indirectlow21.45.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.43.0indirectlow21.45.0
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.0indirectunknown11.18.7
go.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirectunknown11.44.0
golang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirectunknown51.27.2
golang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirectunknown51.27.2
golang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirectunknown10.41.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.