Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-07 09:48 UTC

xunrage / fluidframework

A framework for database access

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗

xunrage/fluidframework holds a health index of 15 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (34/100) and lowest on Vitality (9/100). It was last updated 153 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 20 is calibrated to 15 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

xunragePersonal account

0 followers2 public repossince Feb 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

9Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

15Critical

How it's scored

9.9/36	Push recency — last push 153 days ago
0.7/36	Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18	Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	153
active_weeks_last_year	1

Release discipline

1Critical

How it's scored

0/27	Ships releases — no releases published
0/36	Release recency — no releases
0/27	Release cadence — no releases
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	0
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

21At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	1
top_contributor_share	1

Ownership & stewardship

32At Risk

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25	Owner reach — 0 followers of xunrage
15.5/25	Track record — 2 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	0
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	xunrage
public_repos	2
account_age_days	3,892

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

21At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

1Critical

How it's scored

0/30	Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25	Dependabot config
0/25	Dependency lockfiles
0/20	CodeQL workflow

Inputs used

source	file_signals
lockfiles	—
manifests	FluidFramework.MySql/FluidFramework.MySql.csproj, FluidFramework.Oracle/FluidFramework.Oracle.csproj, FluidFramework.SQLite/FluidFramework.SQLite.csproj, FluidFramework/FluidFramework.csproj
has_codeql_workflow	no
has_security_policy	no
has_dependabot_config	no

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	29
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 29 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

33At Risk

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — FluidFramework.MySql/FluidFramework.MySql.csproj, FluidFramework.Oracle/FluidFramework.Oracle.csproj, FluidFramework.SQLite/FluidFramework.SQLite.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	FluidFramework.MySql/FluidFramework.MySql.csproj, FluidFramework.Oracle/FluidFramework.Oracle.csproj, FluidFramework.SQLite/FluidFramework.SQLite.csproj, FluidFramework/FluidFramework.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/66 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C#
largest_source_bytes	25,884
source_files_sampled	66
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

0GitHub stars

1contributors

1commits, last 12 months

153days since last push

0releases

1bus factor

0open issues

NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/xunrage/fluidframework: run: RepoClient.LocalPath: error during tarballHandler.setup: internal error: handler.httpClient.Do: Get "https://codeload.github.com/xunrage/fluidframework/legacy.tar.gz/refs/heads/main": internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: error in HTTP: dial tcp: lookup codeload.github.com on 127.0.0.11:53: server misbehaving); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

All dependencies 29

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 29 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
NuGet	BouncyCastle.Cryptography	`2.6.2`	indirect
NuGet	Google.Protobuf	`3.34.1`	indirect
NuGet	K4os.Compression.LZ4	`1.3.8`	indirect
NuGet	K4os.Compression.LZ4.Streams	`1.3.8`	indirect
NuGet	K4os.Hash.xxHash	`1.0.8`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	MySql.Data	`9.7.0`	indirect
NuGet	Oracle.ManagedDataAccess	`23.26.200`	indirect
NuGet	Portable.BouncyCastle	`1.9.0`	indirect
NuGet	Stub.System.Data.SQLite.Core.NetFramework	`1.0.119.0`	indirect
NuGet	System.Buffers	`4.6.1`	indirect
NuGet	System.Collections.Immutable	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.Data.SQLite.Core	`1.0.119.0`	indirect
NuGet	System.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.Formats.Asn1	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.IO.Pipelines	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.Memory	`4.6.3`	indirect
NuGet	System.Numerics.Vectors	`4.6.1`	indirect
NuGet	System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe	`6.1.2`	indirect
NuGet	System.Security.AccessControl	`6.0.1`	indirect
NuGet	System.Security.Permissions	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.Security.Principal.Windows	`5.0.0`	indirect
NuGet	System.Text.Encodings.Web	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.Text.Json	`10.0.7`	indirect
NuGet	System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions	`4.6.3`	indirect
NuGet	System.ValueTuple	`4.6.2`	indirect
NuGet	xunRAGE.FluidFramework	`2.0.9622.0`	indirect
NuGet	ZstdSharp.Port	`0.8.8`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 29 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records